Compare And Contrast Aurelius Vs Mussolini

576 Words2 Pages

Aurelius vs. Mussolini: Who was better? When comparing historical and modern figures the question becomes who was better. Aurelius was one of rome's best leaders keeping it safe and leading it in the right direction. Mussolini was a radical socialist that got his way with people but once they found out about the condition of the country they killed him public. Aurelius was a much better leader than Mussolini because he gave the people what they wanted and protected his country and its interests. Marcus Aurelius before and during his supreme power. Marcus’s early life was great considering his parents were wealthy. Marcus was born into a “wealthy and political” family(biography.com editors). Antonius taught him “how to run a government” in his early adult …show more content…

Aurelius and his brother “ruled alongside each other” and were involved in many wars(biography.com editors). Aurelius saw challenges to his Authority towards the end of his reign. In 175, Cassius “claimed himself as emperor of rome” after hearing Aurelius was sick(biography.com editors). He made his “son commodus co-ruler in 177” so he could learn how to be a good ruler(boatwright 416). Marcus aurelius was one of Rome's great rulers keeping the interests of the state number one. The coming to power and demise of Benito Mussolini. Mussolini was impassioned by his political belief and wanted his home country to pursue it. He moved to switzerland “to promote socialism” where he was expelled from the country(biography.com editors). He moved back to Italy “where he was imprisoned”, but his voice became louder than ever(biography.com editors). Mussolini came to power quickly after terrorizing other political leaders. He saw WW1 as a “great opportunity for italy” to become a global superpower(biography.com editors). He formed the fascist party also “hiring para-military personnel” to terrorize other politicians(biography.com

Open Document