Compare And Contrast Aristotle And Confucius

1132 Words3 Pages

Ethics is a moral principle that governs a person or group of people’s behavior. Philosopher’s thoughts were on what makes one act right or wrong and how does the act affect our soles. But not everyone is the same, they all think and act differently especially from the era that Aristotle and Confucius lived in. How can one completely understand the nature of humans when everyone walks different paths and have different beliefs. There are many a concepts of what is wrong and right. Taking what doesn’t belong to you is wrong. Wanting an access of something is frowned upon. Taking a life is wrong, treating a person like property is wrong. Paying your taxes is right, helping a child or elderly is right thing to do. Showing someone you care, giving …show more content…

Philosophy was an activity that people would seek to understand the fundamentals of truth, relationships with others and themselves. Philosophers will ask, seek answers, and argue the answers to the questions they are seeking the truth for. There are so many philosophers from Aristotle, Confucius, Plato, Socrates, to Thomas Hobbes. Who all had quotes that have been taught and have a lot of meaning, Aristotle quoted-“At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst”; a man who has no boundaries is a dangerous person, he also quoted-“the roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet”; it is hard to study and have a family but the outcome is wonderful. Confucius quoted- “Success depends upon previous preparation, and without such preparation there is sure to be failure”; being prepared for what life might through at you if not you wont concur. Plato quoted-“Good actions give strength to ourselves and in spire good actions in others”; one good deed spreads like wild flowers. Socrates quoted-“To know, is to know that you know nothing That is the meaning of true knowledge”; knowledge is the key to unlocking doors that can take you any were, the more you know the more you don’t know. Thomas Hobbes quoted- “Understanding is nothing else than conception caused by speech”; understanding can be caused by speech in many ways …show more content…

The question that rises is why didn’t someone say something sooner? Did those people have self worth, did they have the given morals to make the right decisions. For the most part no, the Enron case Arthur Andersen the auditor knew what was going on, he knew how bad the accounts were. The subordinates knew as well but followed what Arthur was doing. They didn’t speak up because of the ethics within the organization the employees did not speak up against the wrongness. If the code of ethics within the business pushed for the rightness and Andersen lead by example we can assume that the case would of ended much differently and Enron would not of reached the magnitude that they did. The ethical moral all depends on how children are raised, and were how they are brought up. What their parents believed in, and how to act, to stand up for one’s self and stand up for ones beliefs. The more businesses using a stronger code of ethics will have a stronger internal business community. For example Samsonite one man started a suite case company and treated his employees just as if they were his family and customers. The respect, honesty, and loyalty stayed with the company to this day. Samsonite is known for their luggage but in the business world they are known for their code of

More about Compare And Contrast Aristotle And Confucius

Open Document