Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How different were Stalin’s ideology and methods from those of Lenin
Impact of Stalin in Russia
Impact of Stalin in Russia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Communist Ideology's Influence on Stalin's Decision to Implement Collectivisation in 1928
Collectivisation was the agricultural policy, which Stalin adopted and
began work on in the summer of 1928. The main features included, as
Stalin quoted in Pravda
"The transition from individual peasant farming to collective
socialised farming,"
and the process of De-kulakisation. It was an agricultural policy
necessary to try and combat the problem with the poor provision of
grain by the peasants, a problem that had always been evident in
Russia's agricultural management.
The heavy cost and brutality has led historians to offer a variety of
explanations for why Collectivisation was used. Some pragmatists argue
the original aim was to increase the tempo of industrialisation by
increasing the grain procurement. Others draw emphasis on the process
of De-kulakisation as a way of showing Stalin's commitment to Marxism
and Leninism by ridding the countryside of a 'class enemy.'
Chapter 1 Marxism and feeding the revolution
--------------------------------------------
Marx argued the need for collective farming to benefit the needs of
the workers therefore the ideology behind Collectivisation is its
importance to the development of a Communist state,
"They [the workers] must demand that the confiscated feudal property
remain state property and be used for workers' colonies, cultivated
collectively by the rural proletariat with all the advantages of
large-scale farming."[1]
However Marx was a German lawyer with little knowledge of the rural
way of life, his references to Collectivisation were sweeping
generalisations and mor...
... middle of paper ...
...et speech, (1956)
[4] Isaac Deutscher
'Russia after Stalin' (1953)
[5] Das Kapital, Karl Marx (1887)
[6] Stalin, 'On the grain front' (1932)
[7] Harvests of Sorrow, Robert Conquest (1986)
[8] Stalin's Peasants, Sheila Fitzpatrick (1994)
[9] Stalin's Peasants, Sheila Fitzpatrick (1994)
[10] Roy Medvedev, Let History Judge, (1971)
[11] Leszeck Kolakowski, Main Currents of Marxism, (1970)
[12] Leon Trotsky, Miscellaneous quote.
[13] Stalin's Peasants, Sheila Fitzpatrick, (1994)
[14] Pravda Article, Stalin, (1932)
[15] Alan Wood, Stalin and Stalinism (1990)
[16] Leon Trotsky
[17] Party Congress Meeting, Stalin (1928)
[18] Chris Corin & Terry Fiehen, Communist Russia under Lenin and
Stalin (2002)
[19] Even Mawdsley, The Stalin years, (1998)
[20] Bukharin (1931)
Tucker, Robert C. "Stalinism as Revolution from Above". Stalinism. Edited by Robert C. Tucker. New York: American Council of Learned Societies, 1999.
The Soviet Union and Nazi Germany in the 1930s as Totalitarian States A totalitarian state usually refers to a country in which the central government has total control over almost all aspects of people's life. Main features include an infallible leader, one-party rule, elitism, strict party discipline, purges against enemies and political dissidents, planned economy, strong armaments, indoctrination, encouragement of nationalism, an official doctrine that everybody has to believe, and absolute obedience of individuals to the State, etc.
If a person goes back in history of Ukraine, he or she can easily see why Stalin might target this place to install his idea in. Ukraine is the “breadbasket of Europe” in which the USSR gets its grain to feed its empire. In 1929, the Central Committee of the Soviet Union's Communist Party decided to introduce a program of collectivization to the farmers of Ukraine. This forced the farmers to give up all private property: lands, livestock, and farming equipment. By doing this Stalin hoped to feed the industry workers in the cities and export the product to other countries in hope to gain profit to help him fund his industry plans. Private farmers were to be completely being replaced by collective farming or known in Ukraine as kolkhozes. Many of these private farmers, who sought for independence, refused to join collective farming because it resembled early serfdom in that region. Stalin intr...
During Stalin’s five year plan, he wanted to increase agriculture massively to feed the people working in industry as well as sell to strengthen the economy. Stalin began the genocide by annihilating “Ukraine’s cultural intelligentsia—not so much its engineers, doctors, and technicians, but its linguists, historians, artists, folk singers, and others whose work and professional lives suggested a separate cultural or historical identity for Ukraine” (History in Dispute). They had also included Ukrainian communists in the first objective. Stalin’s second objective was to destroy the economic and political relevance of individual peasant farmers. Most Ukrainian residents had their owns farms even when the serfs were in existence; prosperous on their own with the New Economic Policy from the 1920’s. Stalin’s plan would end the independent ways of living and prosperous peasantry.
The question of whether or not Stalinism was a logical continuation of Leninism is a difficult one. Stalinism did take significantly more drastic measures than Leninism did. There were differences in policy. But in spite of these, Stalinism still found its basis in Leninism. Even Trotsky, a friend of Lenin and a staunch opponent of Stalin, grudgingly admits that "Stalinism did issue from Bolshevism" (Trotsky). Stalin's policy of socialism in one country, his use of terror to eliminate opposition, and his suppression of democracy and the soviets were all characteristics of Lenin well before they were characteristic of Stalin. Although some of Stalin's policies were different from those of Lenin, what difference Stalinism did show from Leninism were either policies which Lenin had called for but never put into action, or logical continuations of Lenin's original principles, but modified to suit the demands of the time.
"Joseph Stalin." UXL Biographies. Detroit: U*X*L, 2003. Student Resources in Context. Web. 27 Mar. 2014.
Karl Marx never saw his ideals and beliefs, as the founding father of communist thought, implemented in the world and society because he died in 1883.1 The communist ideology did not rise to power until the beginning of the 20th century. Then it would be implemented and put into practice in the largest country in the world producing a concept that would control half of the world’s population in less than 50 years. The Manifesto of the Communist Party, written by Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels, searched for a perfect society living in equality and united in freedom. According to Marx this could only be accomplished in an anti-capitalist society.2 When their ideals where implemented in the 20th century, their message became warped and disfigured by the leadership of the worlds’ communist powers. Communism became in some ways more and in others less than Marx had first envisioned so many years before in 1848. Marx’s sought a social “Utopia,” while modern communist thought became a view of world domination.3 Many of the centralized governments of modern communism have fallen apart toward the end of the 20th century, confronted with concepts of self-government and revolution. Therefore, it is vital to document the rise and fall of modern communism throughout the world, and review the modern communist thought as it contrasted with that of Marx and Engels over 150 years ago.
The Bolshevik Party’s power was based on the support of the Russian proletariat. Its ideology was based on Marx’s theory of the stage development of modern society- from feudalism to capitalism to socialism and finally to capitalism. The Bolsheviks believed that all power should belong with the Soviets. Soviets were made up of workers and peasants organizations whose party membership ( members were diverse from Independents to Mensheviks to Socialist Revolutionaries to Bolsheviks) was less important than the fact that they were the body that represented the proletariat and the peasantry’s needs in the USSR. They were elected by their co-workers in order to best politically represent the community and its needs. This was to create a clear power hierarchy that was based on the Marxist theory of the worker government.
Stalin's Assault on Agriculture in 1930 The heart of the issue in assessing why Stalin embarked on this policy of aggression is in asserting whether, collectivisation and the war on the Kulaks was an economic necessity or an act of sheer brutality designed to break the peasantry into submission. In 1929, the party moved in favour of collectivised agriculture - large state-organized farms in place of small private peasant plots, and the destruction of independent market in agricultural products. Mass collectivisation began in October; a month later Stalin announced what he called the “The Great Turn” in the process of building a modern, socialized agriculture. He saw the crisis as central to revolutionary survival: “Either we succeed,” he told the Central Committee plenum, “or we go under.” On 27 December 1929 Stalin finally called for an uncompromising policy of “liquidating the Kulaks as a class”.
Stalin believed that there needed to be a dictatorship that regulated every aspect of its citizens’ lives in order to industrialize the Soviet Union. “His plans were in 5 year intervals in which the government took control over all businesses
In order to conclude the extent to which the Great Terror strengthened or weakened the USSR the question is essentially whether totalitarianism strengthened or weakened the Soviet Union? Perhaps under the circumstances of the 1930s in the approach to war a dictatorship may have benefited the country in some way through strong leadership, the unifying effect of reintroducing Russian nationalism and increased party obedience.
The efforts to build non-capitalist society had began in the countryside, where the majority of the population lived. Stalin wanted to combine the farms into larger units that would be run by regime loyalists. Established new collective farms
Although Karl Marx is able to make some relevant points in his The Communist Manifesto, he also makes some points that are just not applicable today, and in my view in any time period. On page 230, he mentions that top-ten list of measures that will be applicable in communist countries. Number 9 is just plain lunacy. "Combination of agriculture and manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equitable distribution of the population over the country" (230). The reason the so-called "country" is less populated is because there has to be room for the crops to grow.
revolution in which there is a break up and elimination of the state and no
21 May 2015. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/index.htm The "Critical Reception" Nineteen Eighty-Four: Past, Present, and Future. Patrick Reilly. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1989. 11-23.