Commercial Law Case Study

1679 Words4 Pages

Introduction of Commercial Law The main objective of the law is to set and provide rules governing the relationship between two or more than two social bodies and between the government and its citizens to solve the conflict. Commercial law mainly concerned with the laws in relation with ordinary business activities likes contract, sale, bills of exchange, duty of care, bankruptcy, companies and many more. In this case study, there are some serious matter took place between Ellen and the Council which later on further we will be discussing. In this case we also discuss about duty of care, negligence and psychiatric injury to Ellen under Australian law Which may be on favors Ellen’s case. Facts in the case to think about  When Ellen was doing enquiry, the council officer doesn’t seems to be very attentive. (Cause he left the conversation in the middle of nowhere.)  When he came back, he just had a quick look on his computer and gave a quick reply. (Rather than checking everything properly in that area.)  Ellen should have confirmed it again to the council officer after his quick reaction. Considering he left the conversation in the middle and only had a quick look of the site.  Before she signs the lease of the contract with the owner of the premises, she should have to enquiry more about that area.  A huge possible chance of failure of the business (meditation studio) becauseof the noise from the building. Which is disturbing for the customers who come for meditation and as well as for Ellen.  At the end, Ellen end up having nervous disorder and threatens her career in alternative medicine. Issues in the case  Whether council officer has a duty of caretowards Ellen.  Whether the council officer has a breach of duty ... ... middle of paper ... ...eighbor against Paddington city council (defendant). Wyong Shire Council v Shirt10, Shaddock v Parramatta2, Majority of the government authorities found guilty by courts because of negligence and misrepresentation. Paddington council could be found guilty against Ellen. She can claim damages, rewards and compensation in the court. Hedley Byrne v Heller Partners, the tort law case on pure economic loss, resulting from a negligence and misrepresentation. Prior to the decision of the notion that one may owe another a duty of care for statements occurred. Before the judgement Civil Liability Act to be consider as a main act. Considering all the legal cases and applying in the case of Ellen v Paddington city council, it seems to be Paddington city councilwould be held responsible or liable for Ellen economic status and mental injury.

More about Commercial Law Case Study

Open Document