Colorectal Cancer (CRC) in African Americans

682 Words2 Pages

Colorectal cancer, or CRC, affects African American men and women more than Caucasians, at a rate 20% higher. This is concerning when faced with the mortality rates among African Americans, 28% higher for women and 14% higher for men than for Whites. African Americans are also more likely to be in later stages of the disease when diagnosed. There is a need to study and evaluate why these factors exist, as proper screening and early diagnosis can severely impact survival rates for CRC. One study attempts to find the solution through testing, however, this study slightly discredits itself along the way. In the article “Culturally Targeted Educational Intervention to Increase Colorectal Health Awareness Among African Americans”, written by Phyllis Morgan, PhD, Joshua Fogel, PhD, Indira Tyler, MS, RN, and John Jones, MD, in 2009, CRC is evaluated in the African American community. The four, working with the Department of Nursing at Fayetteville State University in North Carolina, started a research project entitled “The Fayetteville Area Inter-Faith Commitment to Colorectal Health Awareness and Cancer Reduction in African Americans”, abbreviated “The F.A.I.T.H. Project”. The project’s intent was to increase CRC knowledge and increase CRC screening among African Americans. The doctors participating handed out educational programs to churches and community-based organizations. The study split up 539 African American men and women, all 50 years or older, into an intervention group and a control group. The intervention group received the 90 minute educational programs while the control group did not. To evaluate the effectiveness of the handouts, pre-test and post-test questionnaires were handed out to both groups. The study... ... middle of paper ... ...making the anonymous aspects of the test questionable. The project has good intentions, but lacks the proper structure to make it a credible test for CRC among the African American community. If another test were to be done, it would need to clearly define the variables, eliminating and singling them out one by one. It would need to consist of a wider proportion of the population, while at the same time limiting the size of the groups so that data is easily collectable. The study would need to be anonymous, without payment for the participants, and with a method of data more reliable than a simple questionnaire. The test would have to eliminate the faith-based aspects that biased this project in order for it to be credible among the medical community. The need is still great for CRC research, but researchers should be aware of the credibility of their conduct.

Open Document