Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Development in basketball
Development in basketball
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Development in basketball
College basketball is one of the most exciting sports to watch. A big reason for this is because the best college coaches from the best teams are recruiting the best players. In the past this would make fans happy, especially if a great player goes to the school the fan likes. Not anymore. Throughout the past five years there has been a growing trend of college freshman only staying in school one year then going to the NBA. These players are called “one and dones.” The NBA created a rule for college freshman which states they can not graduate from high school and go straight to the pros, but they must attend college for at least one year, then they will have the opportunity to get drafted. College basketball fans and coaches both have their opinions on this …show more content…
The popularity of college basketball players leaving school after only playing one year continues to increase. Many fans and coaches all over the nation are against the one and done rule and think college basketball players should stay in school for at least two years. John Feinstein, writing for the Washington post has the same view as many people do on the one and done rule in college basketball. He thinks the rule should be done away with immediately. “It is draining much of the joy out of college basketball for
Each March, there arises some kind of brouhaha across the country or at least within the four walls of colleges across the United States. The cause is the highly regarded single-elimination tournament officially known as the NCAA Men’s Division 1 Championship, and colloquially as the March Madness. As described by Chris Suellentrop on the 6th Floor Blogs of the “New York Times” magazine, this “is the greatest sporting event of the year, and in particular, the tournament’s first weekend serves up the most entertaining four days in sports.” (Suellentrop 2011)
There are thousands of high school football players across the nation, and a handful of them have what it takes to play at the college level. Those that do have the raw talent normally get reached by college football recruiters and coaches. The NCAA, the National College Athletic Association, has many rules and regulations especially surrounding the rules and conduct of recruiting student athletes. Men's football takes the most notice, as well as basketball, of all collegiate sports in the U.S. today (Smith, 2015). According to Langelett (2003), the NCAA limits each school to 85 football scholarships. With a limited number of scholarships available, schools spend a considerable amount of time and money on recruiting players.
Association such as the NFL and NBA aren't filled with a lot of people. Barely anybody will actually make it that far, and some people practice for countless hours. "According to a poll from last year only 7.6% of highschool athletes play for college level sports, and only 1.7% go pro from college sports. And when you think about it people who play for college had to practice for such a large amount of time and there not even pro (Manfred)!" So why should the 55.5% of students who play ...
The exchange of views whether a student should attend an HBCU or a PWI has been a topic of discussion for some time now. Whether you attend an HBCU or a PWI you go for one purpose and that purpose is to get your education. So who says because someone goes to a predominantly black school they will not get the same education a person gets that goes to a predominantly white school ? Or vice versa. Many people have some sort of idea that by attending a Predominantly White Institution(PWI) one will receive a higher level of education but that is not truly always the case. Most individuals are under the impression that simply because of your skin color you have to attend that type of school. That is the problem with this case just people see it as one should attend the college with individuals who are like you but not keeping one 's education in mind.
In an article, College basketball's so-called one-and-done rule needs revisiting, Dylan Hernandez quotes Kobe Bryant, "It didn't make any sense. " Kobe doesn't say anything more about this because I think it kind of speaks for itself. Kobe Bryant, did not go to college, he went to the NBA right out of high school and now look where he is at now. I'm not saying that all one and done players are going to be NBA stars, but at least we can give them a chance.
Did you know that there are roughly 550,000 male high school basketball players, 15,000 are good enough to make it to play college basketball, one third of that or 5,000 play well enough to make it to division I which is the highest in the NCAA basketball league, and only around 348 go on to play one game in the NBA. On the other hand there are rare cases of players having extraordinary talents and making the jump from high school basketball straight to NBA without any college experience. The debate on this topic is two sided, the first being that the jump from high school to the NBA should not be allowed and the second being that they should be able to do what they want.
Most players that enter the NBA draft early are 19 or 20 years-old. They are going to end up playing against 25-year-olds that are stronger, faster, and that have had more experience than they have. Along with more experience, they will not be as physically fit because one or two years of college will not do it, and high school will not do it. For example, Lebron James. He is considered one of the best to have played the game, and he went straight out of high school. Imagine if he had gone to college, he would be so much better. So if they leave after the freshman or sophomore year, they will be about five or six years behind and that will make it harder to get a spot on the bench. If they do not make it to the bench, then they will be in the D league for 2 or 3 years to help develop their skills. “The D-League uses a tiered compensation system that's based on experience. Players with ample NBA
It is becoming more and more a trend for high school and underclassmen basketball players to forgo their college eligibility to enter the NBA draft. Most professional sports have restrictions to limit mentally and physically immature players from throwing away their college education to be unsuccessful in the professional ranks. In the National Football League, NCAA football players are not allowed to declare for the pro draft unless they have been in the school’s program for at least three years. In professional baseball and hockey, although they do draft players straight from high school, they have a minor league system set up. These minor leagues allow players the time to develop and still play against an excellent level of competition. This helps their growth process so that when they get into the real big leagues, they are somewhat ready to play and be a factor.
Abstract: Basketball players who enter the NBA early are not ready for the NBA. Early entry into the NBA by high school and college basketball players has had a negative affect on the college basketball program, the NBA, and the players themselves. Each year the number of early entries in the NBA rises more and more. In 1997, 47 basketball players entered the NBA draft early, and the number has risen since then. The college basketball program is drained of talent due to players leaving early. The high school players that go directly into the NBA are hurting the college program because they never contribute to the college program at all. The NBA now has to deal with a higher level of immaturity and disrespect by young players. College basketball players obtain a certain amount of respect and maturity in college. The players suffer by not grasping the concept of learning due to lack of education. Many analysts say that entering the NBA before finishing a four-year program is entering too early. The NBA commissioner, David Stern, has begun to work on ways to encourage players to go to and stay in college.
Sports bring friends, family and our country together more so than political debates or even church on Sunday. Whether it be football, basketball, baseball or everything in between everyone has their favorite team that they cheer for regardless if they are the shits or number one. Americans will have gatherings of their friends every week of the season to watch games and “support” their teams from hundreds of miles away. Sports have an enormous impact on our society in every way shape and form, whether it is kids pretending to be their favorite super star while playing in the yard or it is co-workers participating in fantasy sports or making March Madness brackets, but which is the most entertaining, is it the professionals that are paid millions of dollars to play or college kids struggling to get by while trying to earn an education?
In the world today, many people simply view colleges as athletic departments and teams, which is not the primary function of a university. The purpose of a university is to provide students with a good education and prepare them for the future. There is nothing wrong with playing sports in college. However, athletes are called student-athletes for a reason; the student part comes first. In the long run, a college degree will be way more valuable than what a student-athlete does on a collegiate athletic field. According to the NCAA website, there is merely a 1.3% chance that a college basketball player will play professionally and 1.6% c...
I believe that college sports should be considered a profession. Athletes deserve to be paid for their work. College athletics are a critical part of America’s culture and economy. At the present time, student-athletes are considered amateurs. College is a stepping-stone to the professional leagues. The NCAA is exploiting the student- athlete. Big-time schools are running a national entertainment business that controls the compensation rate of the players like a monopoly (Byers 1).
It presents something unique in the sports world, a prolonged showcase where enduring rivalries are sometimes born. Legends of the game all crossed paths as college kids. Building on collegiate stars gave pro basketball an identity. It allows players to develop better due to the superior coaching staff in colleges. Staying in college will also help players develop a valuable following, which benefits the NBA.
Imagine fourteen and fifteen year olds verballing to colleges, yet I am still sitting here having a hard time what I am going to wear to school student athletes should not be able to be recruited until their junior year because, One players develop at all different ages, next they are not emotionally ready to handle being pressured to decide on what college or c issues they can't comprehend at a young age. second reason is some student- athletes are not as fully developed athletically and academically as other and so they get recruited earlier and then the late bloomers miss the window of time in their class getting recruited. Finally my last reason is it's not good for the school Therefore college coaches should not recruit athletes prior
The issue of giving out scholarships to athletes has become more of heated matter in the last few years. Furthermore, both sides of the argument present good points and don’t want to give any ground to the side. However, is it wrong to give out a scholarship to an athlete that deserves it? Does every Athlete get a scholarship? Do the Schools suffer or the community in that area because they give out a large number of scholarships? Why should Schools keep giving out athletic Scholarships? How are some of the new boundaries athletes have to keep?