Cognitive Factors: Language Aptitude And Native Language Learning Problems

963 Words2 Pages

Cognitive factors: language aptitude and native language learning problems. Skehan (1989) defined language aptitude as an individual’s abilities or skills to analyze language and learn large amounts of information through reasoning and memory. Skehan stated that second language learning aptitude is the “second language equivalent of a first language learning capacity” (1989, p. 200-201), or “a residue of first language learning ability” (Dörnyei, 2001, p. 44). In other words, individuals who develop quickly in their native language tend to have relatively high levels of second language aptitude. Ganschow and Sparks (1991) concurred with Skehan’s point of view and developed, The Foreign Language Screening Instrument for Colleges (FLSI-C), …show more content…

Students’ classroom learning styles can be viewed as patterns or characteristics in response to the learning contexts, and are usually considered unintentional or automatic individual characteristics (Dunn, Dunn, & Price, 1991). Reid (1995) added that learning styles are “natural, habitual, and preferred way(s) of absorbing, processing, and retaining new information and skills” (p. 171). Papert (1987) proposed that learning style be considered “a contextual construct because what learning brings to the learning experience is as much a part of the context as are the more salient features of the experience itself” (cited …show more content…

65). However, some research studies argued that students’ learning styles are strongly rooted in their cultural background (Neuman & Bekerman, 2001; Wong, 2004). For instance, countries of Confucian heritage (i.e., China, Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Singapore, etc.) typically practice an educational system that conditions students to conform and give praise to submissive behavior in the face of authority, therefore, students that demonstrate the greatest degree of passive resistance tend to succeed in this learning context (Rao, 2006). In other words, the chalk and talk, teacher-centered, authoritative instructional approach continues to flourish in an environment that values and respects wisdom and knowledge (Wong, 2004). This teacher-centered instructional method results in students’ lack of proactive participation in class, as their questions may be misconstrued as challenging their teachers (Chan, 1999). Wong (2004) conducted a study that investigated Asian international students’ preferred learning styles while studying in Australian colleges. The author reported that students expressed preferred teaching and learning styles as lecturing and self-study, but were able to gradually adapt to the student-centered approach (i.e., group discussion) only if teachers promoted a learning environment of cultural understanding and respect for individual differences, and took the time to provide support for their individual learning

Open Document