Class in The Great Gatsby and Pride and Prejudice

1412 Words3 Pages

In his novella 'The Great Gatsby', F. Scott Fitzgerald presents class as a personal and definite thing, illustrating how attempts to change your class will lead to tragedy. Jane Austen, in her novel 'Pride and Prejudice', uses class as a criticism of society. Her portrayal of class differs from Fitzgerald's as she presents the idea that class restrictions, while rigid, do not determine one's character and can therefore be overcome. Both novels explore their views on the segregation of classes through the circumstances in the time periods they are writing about. Nick Carraway tells us from the start that he’s tired of the dramas of the upper class. By saying he wants 'the world to be in uniform', the reader knows that class difference will be part of the novella's plot. The first class that Fitzgerald criticises is the rich, particularly those of 'old money'. During the 1920s there were social classes which segregated the people into different groups. The higher social classes during this time had a lot of money, but if you had earned instead of inherited your money you were considered 'new money' and therefore inferior. This relates to the way the working classes are viewed in 'Pride and Prejudice'. British society was stratified in the 18th century and those who earned their money by working were looked down upon. People such as Lady Catherine were worried that the family line would be tainted, ''Heaven and earth – of what are you thinking? Are the shades of Pemberley to be thus polluted?''.The use of the phase ''Heaven and Earth!'' is a statement of dismay and shows the prejudices the upper class had against the lower classes. The materialism of the upper-class is particularly shown through Daisy and Gatsby. Fitzgerald uses the... ... middle of paper ... ...own through Mr Darcy's ''real security'' when proposing to Elizabeth. Despite ''his sense of her inferiority—of its being a degradation'', Mr Darcy had ''no doubt of a favourable answer'', which shows the ignorance of the upper class because he assumes that she will agree just because he is of a higher class than she is. In conclusion, Fitzgerald presents class as a definite thing, and illustrates how attempts to change your class will lead to tragedy. Although he doesn't glamorize it, he portrays the idea that class cannot be altered. This is contrasted in Pride and Prejudice where Austen seems to respect the class system, not when it operates as a dividing power in society, but when it 'acts as a force for morality'. Both endings show that people will always be willing to strive and 'beat on, boats against the current' for a higher class life, despite the outcome.

Open Document