Civil Disobedience: The Boston Tea Party

543 Words2 Pages

Depending on the situation, civil disobedience can either negatively impact or positively impact a free society. For example, the Boston Tea Party, which occurred in 1773, was a form of civil disobedience. The Boston Tea Party was a protest against having to pay taxes. A group of just over 100 people participated in this act in Boston, gathering together on ships, and protesting by simply throwing tea overboard. Hence the name, "Boston Tea Party." This act of civil obedience didn't necessarily disturb anyone's peace, but it did start a revolution, and it did cause thousands of dollars in damage, in their currency, at the time. According to the online article, "Boston Tea Party Facts," the damage that was done would be worth around $1,700,000 in today's United States currency. In that case, the Boston Tea Party in fact would have negatively impacted the "free society." Only due to the fact that it caused quite a bit of debt in their time.

Another example …show more content…

The shooting resulted in tremendous outbreaks in rage. People rioted, saying that Michael was innocent, and Darren Wilson, the police officer that killed him, should have been put in jail after what he did. This civil disobedience was definitely a negative impact on their society. Although the rioters were only trying to get a point across that the boy shouldn't have been killed, and in the long run the people really weren't looking for trouble, it still resulted in great chaos. Since then, there has been many cases of "police brutality" in which many people riot in attempt to get the officers in trouble. All of these riots result in public disturbance, which negatively impacts the free

More about Civil Disobedience: The Boston Tea Party

Open Document