Civil Disobedience: Henry David Thoreau And Martin Luther King Jr.

501 Words2 Pages

The Act of Civil Disobedience in the eyes of the beholder is righteous and should be tolerated by many different governments all over the world, unfortunately when you act against the government there will be consequences for your actions even though you are composed and not dangerous to anyone. People may also say this disobedience is negative because humans can go into a primitive mode that makes them lose control and the same can go with the rest of the group. Cases of civil disobedience have grown to new height and will not stop until the people have their say in the matter at hand. Leaders in the past like Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr have had a positive impact in this world and allowed many men and women to stand up for what's right in today's society. …show more content…

The main mistake that happened in Germany is that the people followed Hitler and “ They should have challenged, and they should have resisted; and if we were only there, we would have showed them.” (Howard Zinn) However there are still people think this can cause bigger harm than fix what has already been done.
Morris I. Leibman, a lawyer in Chicago, says “ psychologically and psychiatrically it is clear that no man-no matter how well intentioned- can keep group passion in control” but many strong and powerful leaders in the past and present like Martin Luther King Jr and groups like the ones in the keystone XL pipeline have maintained control of people. Not only that many of them have won their fights against the government which has helped thousands around the

Open Document