Cinema Fiction Vs Physics Reality

1917 Words4 Pages

A Critique on “Cinema Fiction vs. Physics Reality: Ghosts, Vampires, and Zombies” The article “Cinema Fiction vs. Physics Reality: Ghosts, Vampires, and Zombies”, written by Costas J. Efthimiou and Sohang Gandhi. The authors try to explain or prove that ghosts, vampires and zombies do not exist through scientific methods and explanations. The authors main argument to show that these claim are false, they say” we point out inconsistencies associated with the ghost, vampire, and zombie mythologies as portrayed in popular films and folklore and give practical explanations to some of their features” (Efthimiou and Gandhi “Cinema Fiction vs. Physics Reality: Ghosts, Vampires, and Zombies”) Their argument is obvious that they will point out the …show more content…

In these days many people say that they have experienced with Ghosts, Vampires, and Zombies and some people say that they have seen some, and they negotiate their thoughts with the people they know so the number of believers on these things has been rapidly increased. In another article titled “ Conspiracy Theories: why we believe the unbelievable”, written by Michael Shermer he talks about the reason of why many people make up some thoughts, which do not have enough evidence or do not related to what the reality says. He mentioned the JFK conspiracy saying” A poll this month found that 61% of Americans who responded still …show more content…

They describe it as “to a highly toxic substance called tetrodotoxin (TTX). In an article in New Scientist (2001), Bryan Furlow gives an overview of TTX’s effects blended with a headlining news story: Dodo, a former voodoo priest, confirms that the recipe used to make the drug for zombiefication includes a powder derived from the puffer fish” (Efthimiou and Gandhi “Cinema Fiction vs. Physics Reality: Ghosts, Vampires, and Zombies”), basically they say that someone got poisoned with a powder foun in puffer fish known as Tetrodotoxin. This myth is all about this poison and how the person dies. They say that the poison makes the body functions suspended or in other words the body seems to be dead but it fact the person is still alive, but his body functions are suspended due to the poison effects. They conclude what is the reason of people turn into “zombie” that if someone is buried alive that lack of oxygen will damage the brain, which will lead to the death of this person. But if the person is unburied before he dies from suffocation, then it will make this person appears as a soulless creature “zombie”, and that is because of what this person has lost which is the thinking processes of the brain, because of the poison. So the authors did not prove it as false, because in this case, they might be some people who seemed to be “zombies” due to the poison effect, but they are not real zombies, they

Open Document