Christopher Delgado's Essay 'The Culture Of Denial'

471 Words1 Page

In the essay “The Culture of Denial” (2015), written by Christopher Delgado, the author claims that people mistrust the scientific community because of their beliefs. Delgado expresses this by giving examples of the major topics that people may disagree with scientific studies, such as: denying evolution, not believing in global warming, and believing vaccines do more harm than good. The author uses these examples in order to show the several stages of denial skeptics fall within. Delgado’s essay is intended for a general audience, but specifically addresses skeptics. I agree with Delgado, I do believe some people are in denial because of their personal beliefs, or they are just ignorant. I do not understand how people can still deny evolution when there is scientific evidence …show more content…

I understand parents being cautious when it comes to their children getting vaccinated because of their own beliefs, but the scientific evidence proves that getting vaccinated is less likely to cause dangerous side effects. I believe if people were actually educated on all of the new scientific evidence, then maybe they would not be stuck in their ways. Christopher Delgado began stating there is skepticism when it comes to scientific discoveries. He provided evidence from several cases where people deny the proof provided, such as: evolution, global warming, and pollution. He had a strong argument until he began speaking about vaccines. Delgado provided information on why vaccines are created, his argument began to weaken when he mentioned vaccine exemption rates. Delgado stated, “During the 2013-14 school year, the median nationwide kindergarten vaccination exemption rate was only 1.8%, but among individual schools and communities, the rates sometimes soared to 60% (262-63)”. When included

Show More
Related

  • The Controversy of Mandatory Childhood Vaccinations

    1192 Words  | 3 Pages

    There is a war going on against parents that refuse to vaccinate their children. It is coming from the government that makes and enforces laws requiring parents to vaccinate their children, hostile parents of vaccinated children, and doctors that refuse to see unvaccinated children. They are concerned about the potential health risk unvaccinated children pose to the public. These parents aren’t lunatics but are concerned parents that are trying to make the best choice for their children. In fact, these parents aren’t fighting alone; a number of pediatricians and medical experts are apart of this crusade and have taken the lead. They will tell you there is an agenda, “Vaccine manufacturers, health officials, medical doctors, lead authors of important studies, editors of major medical journals, hospital personnel, and even coroners, cooperate to minimize vaccine failings, exaggerate benefits, and avert any negative publicity that might frighten concerned parents, threaten the vaccine program and lower vaccination rates.” 4

    Read More

  • The Vaccine War

    942 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cognitive Dissonance would be the most likely theory for what these parents choose for their families. They want to be heard; they don’t feel comfortable with vaccines given to babies and feel like it will lead to sickness in the future. Despite doctors and scientist telling them it will make children more at risk of contracting something in the near future. The social issue will not go away. They will always be someone with an issue with it until the vaccines become safer, to the non-believers.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Motivated Rejection Of Science

    1285 Words  | 3 Pages

    The article, “Motivated Rejection of Science” stood out to me because the vast amount of scientific research to back up findings and the vast majority of the population that rejects it. Lewandowsky and Oberauer discuss the prevalence of false beliefs in the general population. They bring up the popular conspiracy theories that have either false or no scientific research, plaguing the minds of many. When the majority of the general population believe in a certain theory – like the vaccines that are ‘linked’ to measles, Autism, mumps, and rubella – the effects can be detrimental. The vaccine craze was felt worldwide and is the best example of misinformation.

    Read More

  • Fallacies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos in Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed

    1750 Words  | 4 Pages

    The documentary begins with Stein speaking before an audience, addressing the principle of freedom in America. He then advances to discourse of the loss of academic freedom in the scientific community through interviews of scientific figures such as Richard Sternberg, Caroline Crocker, Michael Ignore, Robert Marks, and Guillermo Gonzalez. These interviews are contrasted with clips of scientists who refute the idea and validness of intelligent design. To get a perspective about the credibility and thoughts of Darwinism and intelligent design in the scientific community, Stein is referred to talk to other figures of science such as Bruce Chapman, Paul Nelson, William Dembski, Stephen Meyer, and Jonathan Wells. Stein then begins his in depth investigation interviewing Richard Dawkins, David Berlinski, and Michael Ruse, looking to determine how Darwin theory applies to the cr...

    Read More

  • Vaccinations: Health Savior or Hidden Threat?

    1136 Words  | 3 Pages

    The simple injections have potential to save thousands of lives every year and they are making the world a safer place. Vaccines can help create an environment where children are not receptive to disease which would have taken lives in previous decades, and for the general population to be healthy, and to keep children safe from illness and disease people should vaccinate themselves. Throughout my research for vaccinations, I didn’t realize the many stances parents could support. I knew previously before researching that many parents didn’t agree with the idea of giving their child a vaccination that could possible cause an issue that wasn’t present before. Although, I always supported vaccinations strictly because of scientific facts; when I read about the many reasons why parents didn’t it was a shock and ultimately overwhelmingly disappointing. Mainly, because it seems like parents are only looking at the few effects vaccinations could have on a child. Overall, I believe that everyone should be vaccinated, not only to help themselves but to help the public from outbreaks that can easily occur if the anti-vaccination movement continues and makes

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Vaccines

    763 Words  | 2 Pages

    If you compare the life expectancy before and after vaccines were distributed, the human life expectancy has increased by about 30 years! Most of everyone’s lives have been increased due to this wonderful invention of vaccinations. They have allowed us to live our lives more healthily. Vaccines have had an impact positive enough to lengthen the human lifespan, yet some parents still think they are harmful. Parents need to open their eyes and look at how outstanding and superior the pros are while comparing the pros and cons of vaccines.

    Read More

  • Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism

    3078 Words  | 7 Pages

    Offit, P. (2011). Deadly choices: how the anti-vaccine movement threatens us all. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Read More

  • Vaccines Pros And Cons

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    Vaccines work. They have kept infants healthy and have saved millions of lives for more than 50 years. Most childhood vaccines are 90% to 99% effective in preventing disease so why would you keep such an advantage away from your child? “ Vaccines are made with a tiny amount of dead or weakened germs. They help the immune system learn how to protect itself against disease. Vaccines are a safe and effective way to keep your child from getting very sick from the real disease.” (healthycanadians.gc.ca).When the word vaccination comes to mind the first thing that should come to our minds is life saving, helpful, and beneficial. Unfortunately not all people would think positively when it comes to vaccinations, they think of the worst that could happen. I understand they want to know the cons to getting the vaccine for their infant, but information can show you that pros outweigh the cons. Vaccinations can not only protect an infant but it goes as far as saving their lives. Society has a strong influence on people 's decisions. In this case society and parental beliefs get in the way of infants well beings.

    Read More

  • Negative Essay On Vaccines

    1352 Words  | 3 Pages

    They believe some vaccines have side effects that are too risky for children, such as the measles vaccines (Maron). In fact, according to Dina Fine Maron, a journalist of medicine and health, “After receiving the first shot of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination, for example, a child has a roughly one in 3,000 chance of developing a fever that leads to a seizure” (Maron). Such a risk could deter parents from taking that chance because the possibility of a seizure is too dangerous to even risk. This risk has persuaded parents to avoid vaccinating their child in hopes of protecting them. Although the opposition may believe the side effects are too dangerous, they are actually quite mild and have a very small probability of occurring. According to Gabrielle Principe, a professor of Psychology at the College of Charleston, “The risk of an infected infant dying of pertussis is about one percent, but the risk of an infant dying from the pertussis vaccine is practically nonexistent” (Principe). In fact, the threat that these diseases pose, are actually very slim. So why do people insist on using the side effects as their main argument against vaccines? Because they don’t have any better reasons. They continue to ignore the scientific evidence to ensure their illogical perspective makes sense. Vaccines evidently are not serious threats when compared to the disease itself. They are portrayed as a dangerous, threatening, and harmful weapons, ones that could be used to mortally wound someone, or worse, kill someone to avoid using them. The reality is vaccines rarely harm anyone and the chance of any real damage is little to none. The side effects are over exaggerated to encourage others to stop vaccination. Consequently, vaccines provide no threat and are safe to

    Read More

  • An Analysis of J Michael Bishops Enemies Of Promise

    2411 Words  | 5 Pages

    Other, more surreptitious opponents of science abound as well. Ironically, one such antagonist originates from within academia itself: the postmodernists. Of this group, Bishop writes: "According to these "postmodernists," the supposedly objective truths of science are in reality all "socially constructed fictions," no more than "useful myths,...

    Read More

  • Skepticism Essay

    1642 Words  | 4 Pages

    Author stated the right point that students who will know how to properly use skepticism in life will help them to question the boundaries of their beliefs and if they are negatively affecting their health conditions. With skepticism students will understand that if their beliefs, for example, are not allowing them to get blood transfusions which will basically save their life, then they should think twice about these serious aspects of their beliefs. In the article it says “Think the right way”. It minimizes gullibility and shame in succumbing to quackery and the laws of society” (Hess).

    Read More

  • Distinguishing Science and Pseudoscience

    1868 Words  | 4 Pages

    Demarcation between science and non-science or pseudo science is particularly important in scientific education, as it determines, for almost every member of our society, what they will accept as true regarding science, particularly creationism and evolution. Having public ...

    Read More

  • Anti Vaccination Essay

    2192 Words  | 5 Pages

    In recent years, the correlation between vaccines and autism has become the subject of much debate. On one side, there are the anti-vaccinators, or anti-vaccers. On the other, there’s pretty much everyone else. Despite the fact that the anti-vaccination movement has little base in scientific fact, their campaign to end early infanthood vaccinations rages on. While doctors and scientists try desperately to make parents look at the research studies, vaccination rates continue to fall. But, even in these dark times, there is still hope that scientific fact will prevail and defeat the anti-vaccination fear mongers who have caused many children to fall ill and even die because their parents did not properly vaccinate them. This is one of the most saddening scientific failures of the twenty-first century. A failure to educate the public properly has resulted in child, even infant, fatalities. The anti-vaccination movement was started based on falsified data and continues only because of a lack of knowledge and proper education of the general public.

    Read More

  • An Argument for the Existence of God

    2339 Words  | 5 Pages

    Many atheists have used science as a way to disapprove the existence of God. Science is not an accurate way of disapproving the existence of God(2). Scient...

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Vaccines

    874 Words  | 2 Pages

    Recently the number of parents who are intentionally delaying their children’s general vaccinations is increasing. The controversy that is causing the number of delayed vaccinations to go up is based on the fact that there are negative articles connecting them to autism and other similar diseases. When parents are researching vaccinations and they read those negative articles, those articles make them believe that vaccines cause autism. Vaccines are important because they protect humans from preventable diseases and getting them could save human lives. Vaccines are important throughout life no matter what some research suggests. Parents are now more likely to intentionally delay vaccines because of negative press, even though vaccines

    Read More

More about Christopher Delgado's Essay 'The Culture Of Denial'

Open Document