Chinese Grandmother In Who's Irish By Gish Irish

999 Words2 Pages

Gish Jen’s story titled Who’s Irish is a story about a chinese grandmother who was struggling to adapt to a different culture. Throughout the story, the grandmother’s perception and understanding conflicted with that of her daughter, Natalie, her son-in-law, John Shae, and, her granddaughter, Sophie. The narrator is a Chinese Grandmother who was nameless and spoke in the first person point of view. When the Grandmother first immigrated to the United States along with her daughter and her husband (who passed away,) she found success through her restaurant. She believed that her hardwork and dedication gave rise to her success in a different country. This was why the grandmother does not like her in-laws. She presumes that because they are …show more content…

The narrator said “Sophie is a three year years American age, but already I see her nice Chinese side swallowed up by her wild Shea side.” Sophie’s “wild side” which can be interpreted as her Irish side. Whenever Sophie misbehaves which include: taking off her clothes or attack/kick her mom, the Grandmother blames it on her “wide side” and she also believes that the only way to discipline Sophie is by spanking her. Of course Natalie will not allow her mother to spank Sophie because that clashes with American traditional way to discipline a kid which was to “talk” to Sophie. Again, the reader can see that the Grandmother was struggling to become accustomed to the way American family works. Because of this cultural conflict, the reader will conclude that Americans are selfish and we can see that in the story. Natalie wants her mother to help her in the house, babysit her daughter and do as much for her as she can, but doesn’t expect her mother to interfere with her way of discipline. This means that either Natalie has completely forgotten about her culture or that she simply moved on with the new identity second and third generation Chinese Americans were developing and also wants her daughter to follow the same …show more content…

For instance, when I first came to the United States, I realized that most Americans have strong affection for their pets which was different from where I was raised. Similarly, just like the Grandmother could not understand why Sophie shouldn’t be spanked or why John is lazy, that was how I couldn’t understand why someone’s death didn’t make headline but the death of a dog did. I’m not saying that this is an American cultural thing, it’s just an observation. An example of this was 2 years ago when Jeanette Riley was shot by the cops. The cops said that she had a knife which was why they shot her but what was upsetting about this incident was that it hardly made the news headline. Fast forward fourteen hours later on the same day, in the same city, a cop mistakenly shot a dog named Arfee who was left in the car by the owner. This time around the news of a dog getting shot made the headlines in the New York daily news. People protested and the police ruled the death of Arfee as unjust. The owner was rewarded with a large sum of money as compensation for losing his pet along with an official apology from the police department. While Riley’s husband and three children did not receive any apology or compensation. What! That’s insane! This was my reaction and keep in mind that I was fresh out of Nigeria when these incident occurred. I couldn 't understand this contradictory killing of

Open Document