Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Family background influences child development
Socioeconomic status effects on children
Development effects of socioeconomic status on children
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Family background influences child development
Moreover, the research on childhood should be based on individual’s experiences, needs, recollections and personal and social encounters involve in a weighted and expressive style (Treacher, 2016). Hence, a much better recognition of approaching childhood has perpetually been recreated and extricated according to children’s social and geographical region and socio-economic background as well (Hendrick, 1997).
Childhood is a pretty inconclusive position, as much as it is within a time frame and place. Children are usually challenged, by dealing with and often exhibit creative joy in discovering various forms of childhood at home, at school, and places in the neighbourhood, with its differences in terms of multi-ethnic and city-like context.
…show more content…
The experience of childhood should include the geographical location and the family situations that children live in. The ideology of family in childhood studies seems to claim the supremacy of the family in such a way that the transformation in societal growths had no relation with children and their lives (Qvortrup, 2005). It appears that the political or theoretical perspectives were not appreciated to think that this belief has several repercussions for children and the construction of childhood. One implication is the consistent depreciation of children’s value in the society. This is a crucial finding achieved from concentrating straightforwardly on children instead of the family. Sgritta (1994) states that there is extensive evidence which is accessible to explain that children on average and contrasted with other age groups to be part of the lower economic class. Certainly, this could be a contradiction as no one would want children to be somewhat impoverished; but it can be interpreted in terms of two main aspects: one aspect is the expansion of children’s time through society and the other aspect is the emphasis on the family culture. This causes children from lower income families to experience a different kind of childhood as compared to the middle-class or the upper-class children within the society. Another issue of the power of family ideology involves children’s transient …show more content…
It questions that the primitive society do not have the concept of education; it has no knowledge of the modern education too. Yet, there was a minor section of people who were keen in the idea of moral reform of society and acknowledged the significance of education. It was assumed that due to these people, it shaped the isolation of children from adults. Furthermore, schools were influential in this evolution because it detached children from the adults and lengthened the span of childhood – basically establishing an independent experience of childhood. As cited in Jenks (2005a), Mitteraeur and Sieder (1977) propose that there is a certain relation between the elaboration on schooling for children and the growing concern to cater to the urgency and issues of young persons in their families (Ozment, 2009). Similarly, Pinchbeck and Hewitt (1974) concede with Aries (1962) that the development of education policy was primarily accountable for the rise of thoughts in childhood; the compliance of formal education in institutions where there is constant separation of children from the adults, was a precondition of the evolution of contemporary sociological and psychological perceptions of childhood (Payne, 2008). As for the development of family,
Annette Lareau opens her book with two chapters to give the reader an idea of what the examples she gives will detail. One of the chapters introduces the different parenting styles she researches, while the other breaks down the social structure and daily life. She then separates the book into three parts: the organization of daily life, language use, and families and institutions. For such families, “sustaining children’s natural growth is viewed as an accomplishment” (Lareau 34).
Children were strong and ambitious. They were the money makers of the family. This paper will argue how the mindset of a child has advanced in Canada, through the 1800s to the present era, in representing a different perspective of how a child evaluates the perception of how they approach life. Canada holds many histories of the past. The differences with children from to the past to the present are that children worked and produced a lot of labor, to keep the families from starving through the 1800s, present children rarely need to work. The educational system of the past has differed a great deal from the system they have created thought out the times that have developed. Children would use their imagination to create games and play, until the generation of television came into effect. Times have changed and children are one of the many. The social construction of childhood from the 1800s is a whole lot different from the construction of childhood from the 1970s. The agenda of children have changed and adults are not concerned with children working because the standard of living in families has developed a whole new concept, for how families should live life.
Unequal Childhoods overall is a great book with many strengths and very few weaknesses. Lareau’s book has much depth because she was with these families morning, day, and night, and observed the each family’s daily routine firsthand. It is very impressive that she was able to conduct the study by observing these families so closely but never directly getting involved with what was going on. Lareau would sometimes interview the families’ and record their answers so accurately because it was crucial to the study to get every word they were
James, Jenks and Prout (1998) argue that childhood is characterised by sets of cultural values whereby the ‘…western childhood has become a period of social dependency, asexuality, and the obligation to be happy, with children having the right to protection and training but not to social or personal autonomy’ (James, Jenks and Prouts 1998 pg. 62). Here, childhood is described in sets of distinguished features and these features imply that the concept childhood may vary from place, culture and time. Therefore suggesting that there is no fixed or universal experience of childhood, for example, childhood in the medieval UK will be extremely different to the childhood in modern UK and therefore it varies over time, place and culture. Since the definition and state of childhood may vary depending on our cultural and historical background, some sociologist claim that childhood is not just biological, but must have been socially constructed for a specific society needs at a particular time. In this essay, I will attempt to explore ways in which childhood is said to be socially constructed by looking at historical childhood and how it has led to construction of modern childhood in the modern society. I will also explore the agency of children as competent social actors able to construct their social world.
Social class, group of people who rank similarly in term of property, power, and prestige, separate people into different lifestyles and provide them with distinctive ways of looking at the world. It gives each individual 's different roles to perform and allow them onto different stages. Social class set people onto different path; it open opportunities to some, but close it from others. In the article, “Class Differences in Child-Rearing Are on the Rise” by Claire Cain Miller describes the impact of parents’ social class on raising a child. This article argues that families of different social classes supervise their child differently.
The study of children and their development is a new interdisciplinary field unifying research from sociology, anthropology, development psychology, law, and healthcare. Childhood studies emerged from the universal need to understand children’s development, their susceptibility to external factors, and what it means to be a child from the child 's perspective. Children differ depending on many factors, such as place, time, social status, religion, and tradition, and each of these aspects
Class is something that is often defined by ones income, job, and family background, the area in which they live or indeed the schools or universities they have chosen to attended. This criteria is used to label people as a certain class and is something that can be seen in education through the likes of theories such as cultural capital. In this essay I am going to compare and contrast differences between middle and working class experiences of education focusing on two main theories; Cultural capital and social reproduction. I am going to concentrate upon the primary sector in oppose to secondary or higher education due to the fact I believe that primary school is where most children develop their personalities which they carry with them in further life and it is their first academic experience; therefore it is where social class first becomes clearly noticeable. In relation to these theories I am going to research into the argument that parents have a strong influence on their child’s education from this young age.
While all societies acknowledge that children are different from adults, how they are different, changes, both generationally and across cultures. “The essence of childhood studies is that childhood is a social and cultural phenomenon” (James, 1998). Evident that there are in fact multiple childhoods, a unifying theme of childhood studies is that childhood is a social construction and aims to explore the major implications on future outcomes and adulthood. Recognizing childhood as a social construction guides exploration through themes to a better understanding of multiple childhoods, particularly differences influencing individual perception and experience of childhood. Childhood is socially constructed according to parenting style by parents’ ability to create a secure parent-child relationship, embrace love in attitudes towards the child through acceptance in a prepared environment, fostering healthy development which results in evidence based, major impacts on the experience of childhood as well as for the child’s resiliency and ability to overcome any adversity in the environment to reach positive future outcomes and succeed.
In what ways can childhood and youth be understood as social constructions? Illustrate your answer with relevant examples.
Unequal Childhoods explores the lives of children of different races and social classes in order to support Annette Lareau’s thesis that parenting styles are shaped by a child’s social class, and a child’s life chances will depend on the parenting style with which they are raised. These life chances can be viewed as benefits, which “accrue to middle-class children [and] can be significant, but they are often invisible to them and to others” (Lareau, 2011: 13). Life chances are viewed differently for the working or lower class because their strategies are viewed as “unhelpful or even harmful to children’s life chances” (Lareau, 2011: 13). Lareau’s thesis also includes the idea that children will then recreate their class background due to the life chances that their parenting style allowed them to have.
There are proponents of the debate that childhood is disappearing which will be discussed in this section which include Postman (1983), Elkind (1981) and Palmer (2006). In considering these points of view which are mostly American, one must firstly set in context what is meant by the disappearance or erosion of childhood. This key debate centres on Postman (1983) who wrote “The disappearance of childhood” which is a contentious book about how childhood as a social category which is separate from adulthood is eroding. He defines a point where childhood came into existence, which was treated as a special phase in the middle ages based on the work of Aries in his book “Centuries of childhood” (1962, cited in Postman 1983). According to Postman, a major influence on how childhood was perceived differently to adulthood was the invention of the printing press and literacy in the mid sixteenth century. That is to say children had to learn to read before the secrets of adulthood in particular sex and violence was available...
Hoyles underlines his theory by stating that childhood is “constantly evolving in accordance to a range of cultural conditions,” (Brooks 2008:16). This perspective draws attention to an argument that places children, as a mirror to society. Neil postman inherits a similar stance in ‘The Disappearance of Childhood,’ as he describes the construction of childhood is a
Across the globe there are many different cultures that all have different customs and traditions. The location where we grow up, the religion we practice, our parent’s financial situation, and race all have a huge impact on our childhood. People are a product of their environment. One who grows up in a strong religious family might have different values than someone who wasn’t raised religiously. .But what exactly is childhood? At what age does childhood begins to fade and adulthood take shape?
Introduction Capitalist system is essentially devoted to encouraging production and sale of commodities. Robbins (2005, p. 27) observes that, in a similar manner to the other aspects of culture, childhood tends to be socially created and the definition of childhood would thus vary from era to era and from society to society. In the contemporary capitalist society, the role of children takes a prominent position as they continue being pillars of the capitalist consumer society while becoming a primary target of corporates (Robbins, 2005, p. 27). This has prompted the discussions of the state of contemporary childhood to form a critique of capitalism. This paper seeks to provide the relationship that the contemporary child has with the capitalist
Sociology and psychology is the study of the mind and the environment around us which makes us who we are. These theories assist us to understand behaviour from individual and societal levels.