Chicago School And Architecture In The Late 19th Century

475 Words1 Page

While the social circumstance and technological advancement in the late 19th century helped lay the foundation of the Chicago School, the new ideology of uniting emotional life and technical culture in modern society marked the central premise of the architectural movement. As Louis Sullivan emphasized the phrase “form follows function” when describing the style Chicago School (Sherman, 540), buildings during the late 19th century clearly conveyed his idea in concrete grounds. With new construction methods, economic forces, and social demands for more usable spaces, it was inevitable to abandon the established style from the past; since old styles were less taken as reference, the function of a building became the main concern when architects were determining the form of …show more content…

In contrast, the visual aspect of the building was criticized as less appealing. Focusing on the exterior walls, the Reliance did not have four load-bearing walls. Instead, only two out of four sides were made with terracotta, with the remaining two stacked with plain bricks. Clearly shown in the exterior façade in fig 5, the frame-like pilaster was used to link between the walls, resembling an envelope wrapping around the entire structure. Consequently, critic Montgomery Schuyler commented that the Reliance only consisted of a “system of lightweight cladding over a skeleton frame”, and thus did not truly possess a wall in “any architectural sense” (Merwood, 6). Moreover, the color and texture of terra-cotta made the building appear to be rather mechanized and banal; tiles used were also stamped with a flat, repetitive geometric ornament. (Cobb 59) Despite the criticisms, The Reliance Building stood firm in place; most importantly, it represented the capitalistic world of Chicago city, as one of the hallmark of the emerging Chicago School of

Open Document