Chicago Gennai On Farting Analysis

1230 Words3 Pages

On Farting by Hiraga Gennai gives the reader a perspective into the world of various arts in the Edo Period. Not only are we shown what is meant to be a proper practicing of the arts through his satirical character, Crankshaw Stonington Esquire, but he counters this claim that the arts were then lacking in life, passion, and ingenuity. They had become boring and outdated without any creativity being brought forward. To prove this he sings his praises for a fart artist, and engages in a lively debate about what truly marks art as meaningful and how a change to the traditions would improve the civilization. However passionate, his argument may not be effective enough to change the minds and ways of those who revel in the traditional. Gennai …show more content…

First he applauds the fart artist for being unique, “nothing like it can be found, neither in our written records nor our oral transmition”, and goes on to say, “What art! What farts!” (Gennai 395). To Gennai, this idea of originality, not making derivative art, is what truly makes art great and allows an artist to both innovate, and enhance the lives of humanity. Not only does he make this point, but argues that the fart artist is taking something that is seemingly meaningless and making it meaningful, but also tells the reader that, what the fart artist is doing is so exciting that he is attracting more viewers than other more traditional arts, “But to take this thing, that is, beyond all else in the world, utterly useless and make of it such a great success that aside from the main theaters, other shows have to shut down for lack of spectators- it is no mean feat” (Gennai 398). Gennai believes this fart artist is of the highest talent because he truly brings forth originality and passion, he insists that others would benefit greatly if they put so much enthusiasm into their various crafts, “I say likewise, if a wise man could be found who would devote to the improvement of all our lives the same ingenuity as the man here has lavished on his farts, we could expect great things from …show more content…

As a reader, one can glean that when conducting an argument, written or otherwise, it would be better received if one first identifies the target audience. Upon doing so the argument can be made by using more factual data to back up thoughts and opinion. For an arguer it is best to not use sarcasm and slights against those who disagree, it closes them off to new ideas. By following these argumentative rules, Gennai’s argument for the influx of creativity would have been better utilized within the world of the

Open Document