Cheesecake Factory Argument Analysis

As a human being, one of the greatest freedoms is the freedom of choice, choosing a stance on controversial topics, specifically. Whether this stance is created through personal experience, family values, or just simply an individual's mindset, every opinion benefits the diversity in our world. When looking at the topic of body art in the workplace, the argument can be examined from several different viewpoints. Although there are both advantages and disadvantages to displaying ink or piercings in a workplace environment, further breaking down the argument allows one to fully understand just where these arguments derive from and how this form of expression can either aid or harm an individual in a career.
Quality of Work Over Appearance
Diving into the advantage side of this argument, it is often seen that individuals argue that the importance of work ethic should hold more credibility than the appearance of the worker. An article from Stapaw.com further develops this idea when stating “You wouldn't doubt the professionalism of Google, Quicken Loans, and Amazon, but they have a business casual dress code. Even if employees have a business professional attire dress code, they can

An example of this argument is seen in Stapaw.com’s article dealing with the Cheesecake Factory. “However, in the case of the Cheesecake Factory there was a business professional attire dress code, but staff with tattoos and piercings had additional dress code requirements to cover up.” The main point of this argument is to stress the fact that dress codes are always reasonable, but employees with ink shouldn’t be permitted to extra dress codes requiring them to cover certain parts of their body. Furthermore, arguments suggest that better employee and employer relations are established when dress codes aren’t selective towards body