Charlotte Delbo Analysis

1122 Words3 Pages

While first-hand accounts of terrible times are necessary in order to understand the horrors of the experience, it is often hard to get those who experienced it to come forward and give their story. This problem holds especially true for Holocaust survivors and their testimony. When the survivors do come forward it can be even more difficult to ensure that the account is both accurate and effective in telling the story. Luckily, there are those like Charlotte Delbo whose Holocaust account Auschwitz and After is able to use unique story telling strategies in order to create a compelling and clear testimony. Despite Theodor Adorno’s claim “to write poetry after Auschwitz is barbaric,” Charlotte Delbo’s usage of poetry and prose as a vehicle …show more content…

She is able to do this by presenting parts of her testimony as poems while also switching up the point of view that the story is being told in. In addition, Delbo often breaks down the fourth wall and speaks directly to the reader, a technique that is very effective in evoking an emotional response. Delbo’s poetic approach and varying sentence structure allows her to create the “aesthetics of agitation” which makes some of the story easier to understand and digest by using style and structure to convey important but also disturbing details (XVI). When the events of her account become chaotic she uses short sentence fragments to convey the feeling of confusion. Whenever she was describing role-call she would use long and descriptive sentences to make it seem as though the process is going on for a long time like during the roll call in which her friend allows her to cry (105). The varying sentence length helps to enhance Delbo’s testimony and make her experiences that much more …show more content…

The final technique she uses includes involving her own guilt in the stories. She will be in the middle of a disturbing narrative when she comes out of the text to say “And now I am sitting in a café, writing this text,” (29). By removing herself from the story, it makes the readers feel like she is speaking directly to them, which leads to a deeper emotional connection to the story. She also references this connection to the reader again when she claims “It was strange to be the only one to have changed,” (318). By using language that references her emotions after the ordeal Delbo establishes a deeper connection with the reader, and is able to find a unique way to connect to the reader. Charlotte Delbo’s account includes first hand story telling, but mixed in is additional poetry that is often not found in Holocaust writing. By using poetry and varying sentence structure, Delbo’s atypical account is able to create a testimony that . Her story is still very effective and tells the reader explicitly what happened in the camps and why that memory of the terrible time can never be

Open Document