Charlotte Danielson Framework For Teaching

1219 Words3 Pages

Charlotte Danielson, an internationally recognized expert in the area of teacher effectiveness, created The Framework for Teaching, which is comprised of four domains of teaching responsibility (Danielson, 1996). Danielson specializes in the design of teacher evaluation to ensure teacher quality and to promote professional learning. Danielson’s framework is based on large amounts of research, including the Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) project, supported by the Gates Foundation (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, 2013). Danielson’s framework also aligns with the Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC), which outlines what a beginner teacher should possess in skills. In addition, it is the underlying set of ideas …show more content…

As part of the Framework for teaching, Danielson suggested 22 components, which are categorized into four domains with various related elements in each domain (Danielson, 1996). Domain 2 of the Framework comprises skills related to interactions that occur in the classroom deemed necessary for effective instruction. Danielson’s Framework in domain 2 aligns with the CCT Rubric at domain 1. Indicator 1a exists within domain 2 of the Framework for Teaching, but for the purposes and focus of the following synthesis, it will be referred to as domain 1 in the CCT Rubric.
The layout of the CCT Rubric presents a broad view of a skilled teacher, who demonstrates each standard in the CCT, which ensures learning, and achievement in the classroom. The CCT Rubric translates to all teachers, regardless of the subject they teach. The notion is, that if teachers can apply their knowledge and increase student learning and development, they succeed to ensure their students also …show more content…

Carol Gerber Allred (Allred, 2008) describes strategies for improving classroom climate related to learning for the students, while enforcing a set of classroom expectations, informing students of their positive actions, infusing intrinsic motivation, encouraging positive behavior, connecting with students’ families and community, and being positive yourself (Allred, 2008). These strategies align with the attributes described in indicator 1a to foster respect for diversity, establish rapport, promote risk-taking and establish high

Open Document