Charles Taylor Be True To Who You Are Analysis

1555 Words4 Pages

Be True To Who You Are Charles Taylor would say that the phrase be true to who you are is a lie because you can never truly be true to who you are. He would say it is more likely that you are being true to being like everyone else. This means you are more like everyone who shaped you and not at all like who you want to be. They are outside voices always telling us what to do, so we can never be true to who we are. We rely on others to tell us who to be and not our own voice. They are a lot of external influences that are stopping us. They are some we are aware of such as our environment and some we are not aware of such as how our society and its laws molds us into what it wants us to be (51). It begs the question can I really be true …show more content…

No one else can be your true self they can just influence how you turn out to be. Throughout life, we can miss out on the factors that make up your true self. Everyone true self is different, but we each share a piece of our true self. For example, you can listen to your parents or not when finding who you truly are. Who you are is an internal factor and we are affected by external factors in the world. We are writing the definition of ourselves which always includes others. In owning myself, you can say that doing your own thing or finding your own fulfillment is being true to yourself (53). When talking to someone you are reasoning with someone to decide who to be. People make up who you are for you, not the other way around. The people closest to us shape what we like, what we do, and who we are through our language. Everything about our language is who we are to how we speak and who we speak to. This language can be verbal and non-verbal. The language we are introduced to is by someone else through our conversations we are changed ourselves. George Herbert mead called these significant others (53). You can not achieve it on you own, but through our language, we become the things that make us who we are. Through language, we are recognized as to who we are through the conversation we have that we made a decision based on what they like and not what we like. Our most significant …show more content…

If I start to like something because of someone I love it becomes a part of who I am. Without the people I love I would not be who I truly am. No matter how hard I try to leave and be free on my own. I am stuck without them being pieces of them and not my whole self. A sense of who we are is found in being alone. What makes me different from other makes me who I truly am. I may be 5 '4 but a tree can also be the same height as me. If I was the first person to create something it is significant because other recognized that I am the first is what made it significant in the first place (55). No matter who you like or what you want to do we have to be true to who we are. This mean you are not being true to yourself. Our small differences do not matter and you are insignificant by yourself (56). Your real self-has to be chosen by someone else because you can not do it alone. You will always be your true self that others have made. Being true to yourself is like a gift that someone has given you and you just keep passing that gift down. Without others, we are nothing but an empty basket. We are not individualized like we think we are. We are each other in everything we do from the day we are born (58). We have all the tools to do it, but we use them differently for our own fulfillment through the relationship we have (59). Charles Taylor argues you can not be true to who you are without the relationship with

Open Document