Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How religion influences government
The effects of religion in the world
State-religion interaction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How religion influences government
would be Charlemagne and his brother, who had been established as having “divine assent” by the pope. The church-state relationship had solidified prior to Charlemagne’s ascension to the throne, and this unity allowed for Charlemagne to rule with divine authority. Charlemagne would now intensify the church-state partnership even more, eventually becoming crowned by the pope.
With a resolute goal to unite all Germanic peoples and convert them to Christianity under his rule, Charlemagne embarked upon a military campaign. He conquered the Lombards, Avars, and Bavaria. His war against the Saxons lasted for 30 years, during which time he became known as a ruthless dictator. The Saxons were Germanic peoples, but they were also pagans, and they did
…show more content…
Conquering Saxony to the northeast, the Lombards to the south (modern-day Italy), Bavaria and Corinthia to the southeast, and Hispania to the west (modern-day Spain), Charlemagne controlled the entire continent. He eventually conquered the Slavic peoples as well. The eastern Byzantine empire, headquartered in Constantinople, continued to argue for its own legitimacy, particularly after Pope Leo III’s coronation of Charlemagne. As his health declined, Charlemagne crowned his son Louis the Pious as King of Aquitaine in 813. They served as co-emperors, and then Louis inherited the entire kingdom upon Charlemagne’s death in …show more content…
He donated both money and land to the church. Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne on Christmas Day in 800 at St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome as “Emperor of the Romans.” After this coronation, the Carolingian Renaissance began, which included the expansion of monastic schools and the study of academics, literature, art, architecture and languages. Charlemagne even standardized the alphabet, known then as Carlingian miniscule. Charlemagne’s devotion to languages, arts, and culture likely derived from his childhood. Pepin the Short had provided a well-rounded education for his son, and Charlemagne spoke multiple languages as an adult, including Latin and Greek. In addition, Charlemagne’s passion for education expanded as he visited new lands in his extensive travels, thanks to his military conquests. Charlemagne continued his own studies throughout his lifetime. As an adult, he studied rhetoric, astronomy, and mathematics. Although he never mastered reading and writing himself, he emphasized the importance of copying and preserving ancient manuscripts. To this day, many surviving ancient texts are from the scholars of Charlemagne’s
Throughout his essay, Einhard makes constant references to Charlemagne’s piety. He notes that the king “cherished with great fervor and devotion the principles of the Christian religion.” Charlemagne built the basilica at Aix-la-Chapelle, and “was a constant worshipper at this church.” (Einhard, 48)…. He embodied the Christian doctrine to give to the poor, and had close relationships to the popes in Rome. A pessimist might find reason to believe these actions were purely opportunistic or at least had mixed motives—his relationships with the Vatican were monetarily beneficial—but Einhard’s inclusion of Charlemagne’s will removes all doubt. “In this division he is especially desirous to provide…the largess of alms which Christians usually make.” (Einhard, 52). In death, Charlemagne gave much of his wealth to the Church via the archbishops of each city in his empire, and further stipulated that upon the death of one of them, a portion of the remaining inheritance should go directly to the poor, as should the profit of the sale of his library.
The two most popular primary sources available are going to be the works published in The Two Lives of Charlemagne: The Life of Charlemagne written by Einhard and The Deeds of Charlemagne written by Notker the Stammerer. In addition to these The Capitulary of Charlemagne is also available and helps to provide a more political background to Charlemagne. You can also go a bit more in depth to find some primary sources that are not as obvious. The two that I found most interesting being Asnapium: An Inventory of One of Charlemagne's Estates, which provides us with information about the way Charlemagne may have lived and allow us to glimpse what life was like for Charlemagne (even down to what things were growing in his garden!), and De Litteris Colendis: a letter from Charlemagne to Baugaulf of Fulda which shows us Charlemagne's true concern with education in his empire.
The two lives of Charlemagne as told by Einhard and Notker are two medieval sources about the accounts of the life Charlemagne. Modern sources by Matthew Innes and Rosamond Mckitterick discuss how history was recorded during the medieval period and how it was suppose to be viewed in the early ages. Observing each of these sources helps get an understanding of how the writing of history is important in recorded history and how it affected how the history of Charlemagne was recorded.
Every historian interprets the past differently and with distinctive perspectives, resulting in many sides to one story. Often the reader must decide which perspective is more logical, likely, or coherent. Recounting one war took a lot of time and effort because of the necessity to include all sides of the story. Becher, Barbero, Collins and Backman have approached the life of Charlemagne with different points of view; however, Barbero seems to have the strongest argument for the cause of the Saxon War. The other historians were less willing to see the Saxon war as a religious war. The life of Charlemagne was interesting to historians because it was filled with many vigorous wars that he fought including the infamous Saxon War. From the beginning of his life, Charlemagne was destined to rule a nation and lead his people into war, achieving both triumphant victories and devastating defeats. He died of sickness in old age, thus leaving the kingdom in the hands of his son. The Saxon war was the most persistent, yet hostile war he fought because of the determination and severity of the enemy. However, the questions remain: “What actually caused the Saxon war? What gave it life? What are all the different events that occurred during this war? What are some of the strategies used during this war?” The wars he fought resulted in his success as a ruler and as a historical figure to reflect on when considering the greatness of kings.
While expanding his empire across Europe, Charlemagne did remember that he was indeed a Christian, and converted many of the tribes he conquered, to Christianity. However, when 4,500 Saxons resisted, they were slaughtered ("Charlemagne"). But, for better or for worse, by 1000 AD Christianity had spread like wildfire throughout most of Europe, and the Catholic Church, who had crowned our friend Charlemagne the Emperor, had risen to power. Meanwhile, the Seljuk Turks had taken Jerusalem and were threatening Constantinople and the Byzantine Empire (“Crusades”). Near the end of the eleventh century, Emperor Alexius wrote a letter to Pope Urban the II that called for the assistance of his fellow Christians in West (“Crusades”). And, Pope Urban, was more than happy to assemble an army for such a worthy cause, and he also hoped that it might improve the relations between the two
Charlemagne was known to be “a man of enormous intelligence.” (book) “The upper part of his head was round, his eyes very
Charlemagne is a man of good character in both works. He is a man that is considerate of supporting the poor and is generous of giving
Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great, became the undisputed ruler of Western Europe, “By the sword and the cross.” (Compton’s 346) As Western Europe was deteriorating Charlemagne was crowned the privilege of being joint king of the Franks in 768 A.D. People of Western Europe, excluding the church followers, had all but forgotten the great gifts of education and arts that they had possessed at one time. Charlemagne solidly defeated barbarians and kings in identical fashion during his reign. Using the re-establishment of education and order, Charlemagne was able to save many political rights and restore culture in Western Europe.
He had a vision of what it meant to be a great king. He followed the history of the kings after Alexander the Great. He believed he had to increase the social, political and intellectual organization of his society. This distinguished himself from any other ruler from the past three hundred years. Charlemagne wanted to recreate what the Roman Empire once was capable of, but even better. As he traveled, he made sure he created a great educational system. He built a chain of schools and provided classes for chil...
"Charlemagne." Myths and Legends of the World. Ed. John M. Wickersham. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2000. Web. 19 May 2015.
The collection Two Lives of Charlemagne contains two different biographies of Charlemagne who was a king of the Franks and a christian emperor of the West in the 8th century. The first biographical account was written by his courtier Einhard who knew him personally and well. On the other hand, the second account was penned by Notker the Stammerer was born twenty-five years after the king’s death. Even though these two versions indicate the same king’s life, there were many differences between the two. Einhard’s writing focused on the emperor’s official life and his military campaign. However, Notker provided more of a perspective about the king’s legacy and seemed more hyperbolic as well as mythical. This paper will compare and contrast the
The Relationship of Political and Religious Societies in the Age of Charlemagne, Based of Einhard's The life of Charlemagne sections 15-33
He conquered Lombardy and pushed into Spain and Brittany. Most importantly he Christianized the Saxons, a non-Christian tribe in the north-east. He notoriously added to the territories which his father and grandfather had conquered, therefore even before Charlemagne, consolidation of his empire was already in motion. He had to govern through very unsteady times in Europe, stability which was previously guaranteed by Roman Empire was gone, and the only remnants of the ancient Roman society, which was Christianity and law, remained the civilizing
Religion is among one of the aspects that defines culture. This was a key concept for those living in the Middle Ages, whose lives were dominated by religion. More specifically, those in high positions of the church dominated their lives because the church provided a unified culture, or belief system. In fact, in the Early Middle Ages, rulers needed the support of the church to legitimize their rule. This was the case for Charlemagne, who united much of Western Europe and converted his subjects to Christianity. Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne emperor of the Romans in 800(History). “The assumption of the title of emperor of Charlemagne in
The Church played a vital role in the kingdom of Charlemagne. It gave a sense