Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about charlemagne
Legends of charlemagne
Two lives of charlemagne religious aspects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays about charlemagne
During the year 800-814 Charlemagne was known as the Holy Roman emperor and king of the Franks. Throughout his reign approximately all of central and western Europe was included in his Kingdom and Carolingian Renaissance was also started by him. There were two main territories in his empire namely west and east Francia which are chief parts of two important entities of Europe. Initially the East Francia was the Holy Roam Empire but later became the German modern state and while West Francia is modern day France.
Charlemagne is believed as the father of Europe who ruled the immense Frankish kingdom since 768 till his death in 814 and from the year 800 he was also the Holy Roman emperor. After the collapse of Rome he established the initial empire of Western Europe. His Aix-la-Chapelle court was known as the centre of Carolingian Renaissance and was also considered as hub of classical learning. Chalrlemagne’s legend and life is being impressively introduced in this book.
During this time growth as an emperor is described by Matthias Becher, he also outlines Charlemagne’s military and political strategies used against the Lombards, the Saxons, and others which resulted in integrating of these domains into his empire. Under the Charlemagne reign huge changes were seen as pointed by Becher like introduction of jury courts, introduction of new coinage, beginning of Frankish framer, revision and writing of laws of the Franks and reformation of weights and measures. Becher also specifies that antique traditions were being referred by Charlemagne for providing spiritual basis to his kingdom and existence of tension due to difference between traditional and modern thinking in Charlemagne’s court was also explored by him. Becher thus conclu...
... middle of paper ...
...ting against the Lombards (people of Germany who were having control over the central and northern part of Itlay) to protect the Pope. Also during the same period Charlemagne understood the significance of Roman Catholic Church and worldly powers.
Through 768-814 Charlemagne ruled over Western Europe including France, Belgium, Franks, Netherlands, Western Germany and Luxembourg. He was also called as Karl & Charles The Great. He had a motive of uniting all the Germanic people into a single kingdom and to transform them to Christianity. Keeping his goal as his first priority, he spend major time period of his rule indulged in wars. He became King of Rome during 800 and was crowned by Pope Leo III. Charlemagne was able to accomplish his goals before he died in 814. He spread Christianity in west, stimulated the Carolingian Renaissance, reinforced cultural in Europe.
After contemplating Einhard’s purpose for writing The Life of Charlemagne it is important to examine his qualifications for doing so. Early on in the introduction there is a brief history on Einhard and his education.
Einhard divides his discussion of Charlemagne into three distinct sections, perhaps in imitation of the king’s will, which is also partitioned into the same three underlying themes: church, empire, and intellect.
The most famous work about Charlemagne is a book entitled The Two Lives of Charlemagne which consists of two separate biographies published into one book and tells the story of Charlemagne's life as two different people experienced it. Apart from this, there are many other places you can turn to learn more about the life of the king of the Franks, including letters, capitularies, inventories, annals, and more. However, each of these sources seem to paint a different picture of Charlemagne. In one, he seems to be a very average guy; in another, a mythical being, almost god-like; and a strong and firm political leader in yet another. It is because of this of this that we will never really know exactly who Charlemagne was or what he was like, but we do have an idea of what he did and how he lived thanks to those who decided to preserve it.
The reason Einhard wrote his biography of Charlemagne was to explain to the world how this man, who was also his personal friend, was a great leader. Einhard begins by telling some history of Charlemagne’s family and ancestry. Einhard then goes on to tell about every war Charlemagne was ever involved in. Einhard’s main reason for writing this description of Charlemagne’s reign is just to inform people of what he believe to be the reign of the greatest ruler of all time. He seemed proud to have lived at the same time as Charlemagne. He thought Charlemagne made no mistakes in the wars he was involved with. Einhard was proud of what Charlemagne did for the churches at the time of his reign. “Whenever he discovered one in his kingdom that was old and ready to collapse he charged the responsible bishops and priests with restor...
The two lives of Charlemagne as told by Einhard and Notker are two medieval sources about the accounts of the life Charlemagne. Modern sources by Matthew Innes and Rosamond Mckitterick discuss how history was recorded during the medieval period and how it was suppose to be viewed in the early ages. Observing each of these sources helps get an understanding of how the writing of history is important in recorded history and how it affected how the history of Charlemagne was recorded.
...become great and victorious. There is the concept of how everything that Charlemagne did was for his enemies to be converted to Christianity and nothing else. Through the different interpretations, the argument for religious motives was the strongest. Charlemagne used military tactics in a misguided attempt to further the kingdom of God.
The rise of power for Charlemagne was initially a hereditary right, but he used that as a stepping stone to become the most well-known king of all time. The story really begins with the father of Charles, Pepin. The position of mayor of the palace was given to both Pepin and his brother Carloman, who worked together in “splendid harmony.” (137) But after a few years Carloman decided to join the monks and lead a monastery life leaving only Pepin to be the mayor of the palace. Then Pope Zacharias decided that the mayor of the palace, Pepin, deserved to be King due to his influence among his people. While king, he waged war against Waifar, duke of Aquitaine, and this lasted for nine years, by the end of while Pepin died. This left the kingdom to be equally divided among both Charles and Carloman. Charles took up the kingdom of his father, while Carloman took the kingdom of his uncle. There was a lot o...
Charlemagne accomplishes many deeds. One includes Charlemagne capturing the Breton’s. He conquers their land in the westernmost part of Gaul since they did not listen to him (25). Charlemagne, in his lifetime, will go through many wars. Many among those are listed in Notker. Notker his second book on Charlemagne goes into more detail about how the wars were brought about. Wars His rule is not limited to wars. Charlemagne sought out to initiate a sort of Renaissance period
“The apprenticeship of a King” describes how Charlemagne gained power through conquest and diplomacy. In 768, King Pippin died and his kingdom was divided between his two sons. Charles, the elder, and the younger was Carloman. The author says that little is known of Charles’ boyhood. When he was of the right age, it is recorded that he worked eagerly at riding and hunting. It was the custom of the Franks to ride and be practiced in the use of arms and ways of hunting. We may reasonably infer that acquiring these skills formed a major part of his early education. Charles was not a “man of letters” and the author makes no attempt at explaining this other than to point out that literacy was considered unimportant at that time for anyone other than the clergy and Charles didn’t become interested in “letters” until later in life. Bullough explains a number of experiences in public duties and responsibilities, which were assigned to Charles by his father, thus, giving him an apprenticeship to rule the kingdom. For some reason tension between Charles and his brother began shortly after their accession. The author explains a number of conflicts. The younger brother died however, at the end of 771 and a number of prominent people in his kingdom offered allegiance to Charles. Bullough names and explains those subjects. The result was the re-uniting of those territories, which helped to establish the kingdom of the Franks.
Throughout the middle ages, many empires were working on expanding their territory, but it was not always a success unless they had the appropriate leadership to guide them in the right direction. The main empire that grew to extraordinary lengths is that of the Roman Empire. Through many conquests and battles and with an amicable government, it attained its fortune. However, on the other hand, there was another government that shared similarities with that of Rome; this was the empire of Charlemagne, otherwise known as the Carolingian Empire, but it failed to have a prosperous eternity.
Charlemagne Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great, became the undisputed ruler of Western Europe, “By the sword and the cross.” (Compton’s 346) As Western Europe was deteriorating Charlemagne was crowned the privilege of being joint king of the Franks in 768 A.D. People of Western Europe, excluding the church followers, had all but forgotten the great gifts of education and arts that they had possessed at one time. Charlemagne solidly defeated barbarians and kings in identical fashion during his reign. Using the re-establishment of education and order, Charlemagne was able to save many political rights and restore culture in Western Europe.
Charlemagne was mostly known for being the founder of the Carolingian Empire, as well as uniting Western Europe. The son of Bertrada of Laon and Pepin the short, Charlemagne soon became ruler of the franconians after his father and younger brother’s deaths. While ruling he wanted to bring all Germanic people together into one kingdom and convert subjects into Christianity. After three-decades of battles against the Saxons, Charlemagne demanded the deaths of about 4,500 Saxons. Many have said that if the Saxons did not agree to
Constantine was devoutly Christian and was the first Christian Roman emperor. Like Diocletian Constantine also came into power as Rome was facing many problems. Furthermore, Constantine also proposed and implemented many of the same solutions as Diocletian, such as strengthening the central government. Additionally Constantine furthered the division of the Roman empire into western and eastern portions by creating the imperial capital of Constantinople where Europe and Asia meet. Moreover, Constantine also regained Dacia and fought off Germanic
The collection Two Lives of Charlemagne contains two different biographies of Charlemagne who was a king of the Franks and a christian emperor of the West in the 8th century. The first biographical account was written by his courtier Einhard who knew him personally and well. On the other hand, the second account was penned by Notker the Stammerer was born twenty-five years after the king’s death. Even though these two versions indicate the same king’s life, there were many differences between the two. Einhard’s writing focused on the emperor’s official life and his military campaign. However, Notker provided more of a perspective about the king’s legacy and seemed more hyperbolic as well as mythical. This paper will compare and contrast the
Einhard, in his The Life of Charlemagne, makes clear the fundamental integration of politics and religion during the reign of his king. Throughout his life, Charles the Great endeavored to acquire and use religious power to his desired ends. But, if Charlemagne was the premiere monarch of the western world, why was religious sanction and influence necessary to achieve his goals? In an age when military power was the primary means of expanding one's empire, why did the most powerful military force in Europe go to such great lengths to ensure a benevolent relationship with the church? One possibility may be found in the tremendous social and political influence of Rome and her papacy upon the whole of the continent. Rather than a force to be opposed, Charlemagne viewed the church as a potential source of political power to be gained through negotiation and alliance. The relationship was one of great symbiosis, and both componants not only survived but prospered to eventually dominate western Europe. For the King of the Franks, the church provided the means to accomplish the expansion and reformation of his empire. For the Holy Roman Church, Charles provided protection from invaders and new possibilities for missionary work.