Characteristics Of Whistleblowing And Sarbanes-Oxley

875 Words2 Pages

Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley
Introduction
When a whistleblower hears that a person in the organization is deceitful, being fraudulent, take things that does not belong to them or is untruthful, he is astounded that this behavior goes on in the workplace. The seriousness of the offensive and being certain that the offensive happened are determining factors of whether to take a chance at blowing the whistle. The situational characteristics rather than personal ones, (Meredith, 2014).
Key characteristics of a Whistleblower
The whistleblower is a type of displaced dissenter who believes that the only way that corrective action will be taken is through external intervention. These individuals tend to be high performers with strong moral values, …show more content…

The VNSNY provides services for the elderly, disabled and low income people of New York. Their services include nursing care, rehabilitation and behavioral health therapy, and end of life services to those of all ages. The lawsuit was filed under the False Claims Acts of both state and federal law. It charges that for financial gain, the agency “intentionally ignored” the plans of care prescribed by physicians, providing only a fraction of the nursing and rehabilitation visits that had been ordered under Medicare, which pays a set rate for an “episode of care.” The practice seriously endangered the welfare of patients, the lawsuit charges, and resulted in needless …show more content…

Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) protects employees who provide information to, cause information to be provided to, or assist in an investigation by a federal regulatory or law enforcement agency, or a member of Congress or an internal investigation by the company related to fraud. An employee that has been retaliated against can file an enforcement action with the U.S. Department of Labor within 180 days of the violation, (Pirrone, 2015, pgs. 95-97). Mr. Lacy would have been protected under the federal statues if he was still employed with the VNSNY.
Conclusion

Mr. Lacey brought a lawsuit against VNSNY that alleges that millions of dollars were gained through false claims to Medicaid and Medicare because the company was billing for services that were not rendered to its clients, even though those clients needed the services. This case is in the beginning stages and with the evidence documented by Mr. Lacey, I am hoping for VNSNY will be ordered to pay millions of dollars in fines as well as compensate the clients that was intentionally ignored of their plans prescribed by their physicians.

Open Document