Character Analysis: All The Pretty Horses

726 Words2 Pages

Scott Kim 10/10/15 Period 7 Claps All the Pretty Horses Q3 Prompt A The story All the Pretty Horses by Cormac McCarthy guides readers from central United States to territories of Mexico. Throughout John Grady’s growth, from young and confused child to a mature, wise adult. In the process, the readers see major conflict McCarthy presents, which is John Grady’s response to justice or injustice in a corrupt society around him. Though John Grady’s surroundings are corrupt in All the Pretty Horses and he faces disappointments, he trusts in the fact that good will triumph over evil will make him able to maintain his moral in corrupt society, but only through limited scope of his conflicts not on scope of other characters. John Grady believes …show more content…

One of the place where his belief is apparent is when Blevins is executed. Blevins get executed with no trial or discussion of right or wrong at all. John Grady gets upset because he found out Blevins died without any fair trial. To John Grady, Blevins’ execution without a trial shows that the society is corrupt because John believed Blevins deserved good. So when Blevins died without deserving his good, the trial, he sees the world as a corrupt place. However, John Grady’s trust is not shattered as he thinks it is. John Grady does not know, but Blevins is actually corrupt inside because he lied to Grady about his entire identity. Though John Grady does not realize this and believes his ideal justice has been shattered, his ideal justice is actually not shattered because Blevins is …show more content…

Although he had a fair travel, he was never able to find the true owner of the horse. Winning a trial and gaining the horse back in the end serves to show there is a justice in the corrupt society and thus able for John Grady to maintain his moral. Not being able to find the true owner of the horse, on the other hand, shows some degree of failure in his ideal justice because he was only able to find his justice only through his, not any others. The owner of the horse, who we don’t know if he or she was corrupt, never gained his or her horse back. Based on John Grady’s ideal justice, readers assume that the owner must be corrupt because he or she never received the horse back as a punishment. Though there is an element of justice where John Grady was able to find one case of ideal justice, it was overall a failure because he was not able to fully see his justice appeared on anybody

Open Document