Change In Lord Of The Flies Essay

937 Words2 Pages

Frank B. Kellogg, a former American senator and Nobel Peace Prize winner once said, “It is not to be expected that human nature will change in a day.” Signified by this quote is the idea that it takes a long time to develop a person’s sense of self. Throughout someone’s life, they have many experiences and are in many different environments that change and create their character. These occurrences define a person. Sometimes these changes can be for the worst, as demonstrated by Jack Merridew in Lord of the Flies by William Golding. Experiences also help to define a person, as demonstrated by the narrator in “Fish Cheeks,” by Amy Tan. Other times, the environment and the experiences that take place within their surroundings can help characters …show more content…

At the beginning of the novel, he was a proper British choir boy, but as the book progresses, Jack is subjected to a different environment, one without strong authority or structure. He goes from a society with laws, government, and strong morals, to a desert island with no adults and order at all. Due to this change, he gets increasingly violent and bloodthirsty. Experiences also helped to define Jack’s character. In the beginning, when they were first stranded on the island, Jack wasn’t able to kill a pig that was trapped in the creepers. He couldn’t do it and, “the enormity of the knife descending and cutting into living flesh,” was too much for him, (Golding 31). At first. As the book progresses his desire to kill proliferates, and soon he does. Slaughtering the pig on the island is the catalyst for him. After this Jack gets increasingly animalistic and alien, much different from the boy from before. At one point, when they are painting themselves with blood of the dead pig, “he looked in astonishment, no longer at himself, but at an awesome stranger,” (Golding 64). This demonstrates that after slaying the pig, he begins to disassociate with his past self, and see himself as a “stranger.” Jack changed because of the environment he was subjected to and the things he went through, and is no longer the proper British boy with morals and values, who would understand that murdering an innocent animal is …show more content…

In this story, her mom is describing how you don’t need a Prince Charming to have a happily ever after. She grew up in a society in which, “throughout childhood, we are taught to look for a happily ever after,” (Motavalli para. 1). This way of thinking is influenced by stories of perfect princes and princesses finding each other and living a perfect happily ever after. The societal values she grew up with taught her this way how her life was supposed to play out. However, her home environment taught her something different. Her mom knows her dad isn’t perfect, and readily admits it, saying, “If he were Prince Charming, he wouldn’t snore, would be able to cook, and we would never argue. But you know what? He’s a damn good frog.” Delia Motavalli knows her parents love each other, and even if they aren’t perfect, they can still have a happily ever after. What her mom said to her was reflected in the environment she grew up in, which reinforced the lesson her mother was trying to teach

Open Document