Cerner And CPSI System Case Study

1869 Words4 Pages

Recommend which system is the best choice to meet meaningful use requirements in this particular setting. Both Cerner and CPSI have helped hospitals meet CMS Stage 1 and Stage 2 requirements. However, Cerner provides a modular concept that larger hospitals are using more than complete inpatient systems to achieve MU (Zieger, 2013). In 2014, EHR vendors said eight hospitals had attested to MU Stage 2, and Cerner was used twice as much as CPSI (Gregg, 2014). Concerning Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE), CPSI System had the broadest reach in community hospitals; nevertheless, the software was missing functionality and usability (KLSA Enterprises, 2010, p. 6). Therefore, CPSI’s CPOE was significantly below the market-average due to low physician satisfaction (KLAS Enterprises, 2010, p. 6). KLAS Enterprises (2010, p. 2) reported Cerner clients were happier the more they adopted CPOE. Cerner appears to align more with MU requirements with user-friendly software. However, the cost of Cerner Millennium Powerchart is significantly more. Nonetheless, Cerner is proving to be superior in community hospitals. SMC wants to develop multiple services to the nearby community. After implementation, SMC plans to expand the healthcare campus with a substantial grant from a local community member. The multiphase …show more content…

With clinicians and CEHRT, the ONC plans to improve healthcare quality through interoperability (Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, n.d.) The ONC will promote more appropriate healthcare decisions in real-time, patient-centered care, and prevention of medical errors (Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, n.d.). The ONC’s goal is to reduce healthcare costs by addressing inefficiencies (Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology,

Open Document