Cat On A Hot Tin Roof Character Analysis

750 Words2 Pages

Of the plays we have discussed and read over, Cat on a Hot Tin Roof is the most realistic and powerful, but also the least enjoyable. A lack of enjoyment does not mean a lack of greatness; this play was great. What I mean is, this play didn’t promote good feelings, and if I was to go see it I wouldn’t be able to see it again afterwards. Each character was whiny and conniving, and honest despite maintaining a web of lies between eachother. It was the honesty and lack of pretense that made Cat on a Hot Tin Roof so real and so repulsive. Sometimes plays are not meant to entertain. Cat on a Hot Tin Roof was meant to share the cynicism of its playwright and shock the audience into reassessing themselves and their motives. The whole play takes place …show more content…

Sometimes these two merge, and most people are a combination of normality, and logical principles. For example, in the play, Maggie and rest of the family (minus Big Daddy and Brick) get caught up in the political circus that ensues Big Daddy getting cancer, and try to win the favor of Big Daddy for his inheritance. During the time of the play, and even now, this was and is normal. Money normally drives people to kowtow to powerful owners of money. However, it’s not truly realistic to do that. Brick does not attempt in the slightest to gain Big Daddy’s money, and Big Daddy only attends to Brick. Big Daddy even says to Brick, “You I do like for some reason, did always have some kind of real feelin’ for-affection-respect (Williams, 433).” Brick’s not trying to deceive Big Daddy, and he’s not concealing an ulterior motive in false affection. He’s being true to himself, which in the play isn’t normal. This play exaggerates the normal minded people, and the truthfully minded people, so that there is contrast (Big Daddy is both keeping a façade of normality, and being true to himself). So then, if Maggie and the family are acting normal, and Brick is acting truthfully then, who is

Open Document