Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative essay
Argumentative essay design
Argumentative essay friend or foe
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”-Ghandi. Revenge is a part of human nature. When people are attacked, their instinct will be to fight back or flee; the fight or flight response. If they choose to fight, they will become the avenger and plot the downfall of their enemies. If they choose to flee, they will forgive. Forgiveness lets their injuries heal and all is forgotten. In Francis Bacon’s essay, About Revenge, he uses a harsh tone and alludes to ancient rulers and biblical figures to show his opinion on revenge. In Edgar Allan Poe’s story, The Cask Of Amontillado, Poe uses an over exaggerated example of revenge in order to show his opinion on revenge. Through the use of tone, allusions, and characterization, the authors assert that revenge …show more content…
Francis Bacon refers to famous rulers and uses a harsh tone to persuade the reader that revenge is not justified. Bacon opens up his essay by stating. “Revenge is a sort of wild justice. The more people try to take revenge, the more the law should punish them. When a man commits a crime, he breaks the law. But when an injured person takes revenge, the person destroys law itself” (Bacon). Bacon uses the words wild justice to compare vigilantes to wild animals. He is also saying that when people bring chaos upon their enemy to get revenge, it destroys law. There would be no point of having law if everybody could do what they want. It is better to heal than cause anarchy. “King Solomon, I am sure, said it is glorious for a person to forget an injury” (Bacon). Bacon alludes to King Solomon in order to say that forgiveness is better than revenge. Forgiveness lets injuries heal while revenge leaves wounds open. “There was an Italian ruler, Cosimo de Medici, who said the following to his friends who might betray him or injure him.’We read,’ he said, ’that
Summary: The story begins with Montresor, the narrator, saying how he had been injured by Fortunato “thousands” of times, but when he was insulted by him, he wanted revenge. He decided to use Fortunato’s weak point, fine wines, against him, since Fortunato prided himself on his connoisseurship of wine. So, one day during the carnival season, Montresor sees Fortunato and tells him that he has a pipe of what he believes is Amontillado and would like him to come try it to see if it is. Montresor tells him that if he is busy or his cough is too bad, he can ask Luchresi, but Fortunato says that “Luchresi cannot tell Amontillado from Sherry,” and he will be able to go. They start out for Montresor’s house since the wine is in the vaults of his house. None of the servants are home since it is the carnival season and Montresor gave them off and told them not to come back until the morning; so he could get his revenge without them knowing. As they walk through the catacombs, Fortunato’s cough gets worse and worse and Montresor repeatedly asks him if he wants to go back, but Fortunato refuses. Montresor also keeps giving Fortunato more alcohol as they continue to walk through the labrynthic catacombs to get him drunk. When they finally got to the wine, Fortunato began to drink it and as he did, Montresor began to build a brick wall at the entrance to the niche. After he finished the first tier though, he noticed that Fortunato wasn’t as drunk as he though he would be. He began to speed up and built up the wall more and more until he was almost done and Fortunato got to the wall. Fortunato took it as a joke and told him to take it down, but he didn’t and kept going until he had only one more brick to put in. At this point, Montresor tossed the torch in and put the last brick in.
Montressor had said “In pace requiescat!”, but rest in peace Fortunato did not. As Fortunato took his last breath he heard Montressor yell his name and then leave. A strange sensation then came over Fortunato and he could sense the energy flowing out of him, a rising feeling held him above the ground as he became a restless spirit. He thought to himself “Why am I not allowed to go? What must be keeping me here?”, and then recalled that it was Montressor that had done this to him, Montressor that had led him into the vaults and then sealed him up to die of pneumonia. Revenge, that was what had drove Montressor to murder, and what was keeping Fortunato in the mortal world. Fortunato realized that he must find Montressor, and exact his revenge before he would be able to pass over. And down there, in the deepest, darkest vault, he planned his revenge.
In Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado,” the main character, Montresor, leads his enemy, Fortunato, into his catacombs, and there buries him alive by bricking him up in a niche in the wall; Poe gives no actual reason for this except to say that Montresor has been “insulted” in some way. In his Science Fiction work “Usher II,” Ray Bradbury adopts many of Poe’s works in creating his story—including pieces from “TCoA.” What separates Bradbury’s work from other authors who borrow works and re-imagine them (Gregory Maguire’s Wicked, Geraldine Brooks’s March, and Peter Carrey’s Jack Maggs, for instance), is that “Usher II,” in its imaginative way, is trying to be one with its predecessor. Bradbury seeks to retain Poe’s love of the double and the secretive (Gothic mentalities where the reader is meant to be a bit uncertain about what they’re reading and what’s going on) while adding, most notably regarding “TCoA,” the things Poe never had much care for: a beginning, an end, and reason—thus making “Usher II” not only an homage to Poe’s work, but a companion piece whose beating heart lies within the original work.
After kissing one’s arse; or being harassed for money; or having someone demoralize another’s occupation, according to “The Miller’s Tale”, “The Friar’s Tale”, and the tension between The Summoner and The Miller, one might have the motive to cause harm to those who hurt them. This shows the level of maturity in the characters, as well as demonstrating human feelings such as hurt, anger, and animosity. In The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer illustrates the pilgrims and characters within their stories as strong, clever, and sometimes even childish. They are often quick to react with revenge to solve their problems, instead of thinking about their actions. However, even if revenge does work to their advantage, it’s not always the most morally correct way for them to fix their troubles.
Revenge is best served cold or so says the well-known expression. This idea of revenge that they seek is usually to restore a balance and take an “eye for an eye” as the bible says. Revenge, if by chance everyone were in Plato’s perfect utopia, would be in a perfect form, where justice and revenge would be one, and the coined phrase an “eye for an eye” would be taken literally. By taking an eye for and eye, and punishing those who did wrong equally as they did wrong, there is justice. However, this revenge sometimes goes to far and is consequently not justice. This notion of Revenge and justice is often in literature, one of the better-known being the novel The Count of Monte Cristo, written by Alexandre Dumas. However, literature is not the only time that revenge and justice is discussed in. Works and Rules and real-life events that took place like the Bible, Hammurabi’s code, Twelve Tables, and others each have something different about the topic. More religious texts seem to forbid violence, while laws, such as the Hammurabi’s code, recommend revenge, but equal revenge. By judging from literature, it can be concluded that most authors have different opinions on the matter at hand, and revenge is sometimes justice, but usually not, and tends to lead to violence that was not intended.
Humanity’s most motivational instinct is revenge. It is this inclination that is the catalyst which has brought about pivotal historical events forever shaping society today. Revenge is a defining characteristic of humans, intent on inflicting harm upon another who has wronged them in some way. It is this internal lust for reprisal which William Shakespeare explores in the play Hamlet to create the ultimate ambition of the protagonist. Each of Hamlet’s actions brings him closer to enacting his retaliation against his father’s killer. The repercussions of his actions, however, dramatically alter the storyline as other characters suffer and change, such as Ophelia, due to his actions. Hamlet’s carelessness in turn, creates
Being a teenager is hard, sometimes it feels as if the entire world is fighting against you. Every day the world seems to bombard you with stress, and you become irritated, frustrated, and enraged. In Edgar Allen Poe’s, The Cask of Amontillado, depicts a madman driven by his desire to get revenge. This madman becomes obsessed with this want, and lets it override his thoughts. By examining teenager’s life, while in class, doing homework, and working in groups, one can see that a teenager must remain calm and take negative aspects of life with a grain of salt, rather than to overreact.
Revenge. People who have been wronged long to get back at the one who caused them harm. Their actions and thoughts play a large part in their plot of revenge. Both “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe and “A Poison Tree” by William Blake follow different roads to revenge. The narrator of “The Cask of Amontillado” described the murder of a man named Fortunato who was tricked into believing that he was going to taste some Amontillado. In comparison, “A Poison Tree” shows the figurative death of one who harmed another. Both “The Cask of Amontillado” and “A Poison Tree” demonstrate the concept of revenge. furthermore, the narrator and speaker’s thoughts and actions are both similar as well as different. Nevertheless, their personalities
In the play, The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare claims that an act of revenge leads to madness and insanity. Shakespeare’s claim holds true today because nowadays there are real life events cases that affected every adults and teenager and even little kids. These tragedies and nightmares are all caused by the single act of revenge. In today society, you are accountable for what you do and responsibility plays are a big role in our environment. In the play, Shakespeare proved his claim by using the character Hamlet, who is destined to take vengeance for his father’s death and eventually turns into an insane person. His actions lead to the insanity of others characters and affect them physically and mentally.
The stories “The Cask of Amontillado” and “The Poison Tree” develop their themes by using quotes to show how their actions and what they say express what characters true emotions are. The line “ The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as best I could; but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge”(Poe 58) expresses that Montresor could not take anymore of Fortunato’s insults and now wants revenge, and prepares to murder him to get it. A few lines from “ The Poison Tree” demonstrates how the protagonist wants to get revenge on his enemy, and also shows how the quotes unveil how similar the themes are in both stories. Although both stories have their differences, the quotes from both stories reveals how the themes of murder and revenge are developed throughout the story.
Edgar Allan Poe is one of greatest American authors and poets. He is well-known as a master of using irony in his story. “The Cask of Amontillado” is a horror story about revenge of Montresor upon Fortunato. Fortunato believes Montresor is his good friend, but he ends up with being chained and walled in to the catacombs. There are three types of irony used in this short story: verbal irony, dramatic irony, and situational irony. Using these ironies, Poe wants the readers to understand about Montresor’s “friendship” with Fortunato.
In modern times, phrases such as “an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind,” are commonly used. Also, the mere word revenge holds negative connotations as it is seen as immature and unnecessary. The theme of revenge uses archetypes to develop ideas without having to reiterate their meaning. According to the creator of the term, Carl Jung, “archetypes are defined as being a collectively inherited unconscious idea, pattern of thought, image, etc., universally present in individual psyches.” (Dictionary) The Count of Monte Cristo, one of the novels that pioneer this theme, tells the story of a man’s quest for revenge on those who betrayed him. This man spends 14 years of his life imprisoned because of his betrayers, but he manages to escape to avenge his suffering. In the novel The Count of Monte Cristo, Alexandre Dumas uses the archetypes of the byronic hero, the betrayer and the old sage to demonstrate that one’s suffering doesn’t give them the right to seek revenge on those who have failed them.
Literature like The Interlopers, Romeo and Juliet, and the biography of Tanemori demonstrates Bacon’s revenge idea where harm is given to them when they seek revenge. First, in The Interlopers, Georg and Ulrich seek revenge on each other, as a result; they die from wolves and their family feud continues. Next, in Romeo and Juliet, Romeo seeks revenge on Juliet’s cousin Tybalt; his punishment for revenge is being banned and then later on killed, though his family feud with Juliet ends. Lastly, in Tanemori’s biography, Tanemori spends his life constantly wanting revenge on America; therefore he ends up realizing his life is being wasted, so his feud with America ends. In conclusion, Bacon’s idea has a very accurate way of depicting what will happen when one seeks revenge in either literature, or real life itself.
Sir Francis Bacon once said in his famous work Of Revenge that, “Vindictive persons live the life of witches: they are mischievous and come to a bad end”. Seeking revenge is a practice that Sir Francis Bacon was not fond of. Personal revenge is petty and keeps the wounds open longer than necessarily needed. Sir Francis Bacon believes that public revenge for the greater good was not as bad as personal revenge, but he still did not fully approve of it. Revenge is used in numerous works to add drama and character. Many famous works such as, Present Tense by Pearl Jam, The Interlopers by Saki, and even the famous play Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, use revenge as the main topic to prove that Bacon’s idea still stands true today.
Through previous years, philosopher’s have tested numerous theories that help us in defining the nature of our being, often these are stalled by the nuanced thought behind our heart and mind. Philosophers often believed that we were slaves to our passions despite our reasoning, even now this could be proven by acts of love, but more than often proven it can be seen through our desire for revenge. Unlike it’s counterpart [avenge], revenge is both a verb and a noun that can be not only acted upon but attained. Revenge is what one seeks after being wronged and often an action never thought through by reason, but a fight of a person’s passions towards a self declared justice. Portrayed in a copious amount of movies, songs, and art, the theme of revenge has been held iconically within Shakespeare's most famous play, Hamlet. Centered around corruption of the mind, body and soul, Hamlet is seen by many as the embodiment of revenge through it’s characters (Hamlet, Laertes, and Fortinbras); it is within their actions and development that each character portrays the dichotomy of their passion and reason to prove that we are slaves to our passions until reason catches up.