Case Study: Why Tony Romo Beats Dan Prescott

519 Words2 Pages

Why Tony Romo Beats Dan Prescott for An NFL Play-offs Place Every sports team manages to find its success through small decisions that later turned out to be huge. Turning point that at the moment seem trivial can soon become a pivotal factor in the season. It can determine who wins trophies, and who ends up with nothing. One of the main arguments being seen on the run-up to the beginning of the NFL Play-Offs, though, is the choice of who should be Signal Caller for the Dallas Cowboys. There’s a lot of arguments going on at the moment between whether or not it should be Tony Romo, or Dak Prescott. We want to try and put across the argument for why Romo should be the pick over Prescott. Despite the fact that Prescott has been fantastic this reason for the Cowboys, and has been showing why he might be the next star in that position for the team, Romo should start in the play-offs for sure. Despite his injury setbacks this year, Romo has the experience that should always be counted on when it comes to the biggest matches. …show more content…

The historical precedent shows that ‘rookie’ signal callers like Prescott tend to struggling in post-season. Indeed, since the merger there has been a shocking 15-42 touchdown to turnover ratio for fresher quarterbacks. Indeed, only three of these passers managed to top over 200 yards – Romo has experience and knowledge in those situations that Prescott simply cannot compete

More about Case Study: Why Tony Romo Beats Dan Prescott

Open Document