Case Study Tommy Vs The Car Dealer

405 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Void and voidable contract cases

In this case, Tommy would prevail against the car dealer. Tommy is a minor by the time he bought the car. According to the law, minor cannot enter a contract obligation. Because their contract are voidable, minors have the right, until a reasonable time after reaching the age of majority, to disaffirm or void their contracts (Kubasek 361). Therefore, Tommy can return the car to the car dealership with its present state and the car dealer should refund Tommy’s full payment. If the car dealer does not agree to refund the car payment, Tommy can file a complaint against the car dealer to recover his money. On the other hand, I think it’s unethical to return a car that was used for six months, has eight thousand miles, wear off tires and bent front

Show More
Related

  • Exchange Vs Alderson

    1167 Words  | 3 Pages

    When doing an evaluation of any case, you should always look at all the relevant facts and issues involved before jumping to conclusions. As for this case, Mike Thurmond, the operator of Top Quality Auto Sales, a used car dealership, has financed his dealerships inventory of vehicles by creating a financing arrangement with Indianapolis Car Exchange (ICE). ICE then filed a financing statement that listed Top Quality’s inventory as collateral for the financing. After this, Top Quality sold a Ford truck to Bonnie Chrisman, who was also a used car dealer. Chrisman paid Top Quality for the truck and then proceeded to sell it Randall and Christina Alderson, who paid Chrisman for the vehicle. In

    Read More

  • Case Study: National Labor Relation Board V. Shop Rite Foods

    262 Words  | 1 Pages

    (Cheeseman2013) In the National Labor Relation Board v Shop Rite Foods case some employees of Shop Rite Foods of Texas elected a worker union as a Bargaining agent for a collective bargaining agreement for over 3 months the agreement was still not settled. Then ShopRite began to notice a lot of it merchandise being damaged in the warehouse. They determined that the damage was being intentionally being caused by dissident employees as a pressure tactic to secure concessions from the company in the collective bargaining negotiations.

    Read More

  • Takem's Case

    2560 Words  | 6 Pages

    Walker, Takem’s has the statutory law of contracts in his favor. In a contract, the seller and the purchaser have certain rights and obligations. Four basics must be met for a contract to be created (Chrisman, 2014). First, the offer has to be made. In the case at hand, the door-to-door salesperson made an offer of a computer to Ms. Walker. Second, the consideration has to be accepted. Ms. Walker accepted the offer to purchase a computer. The third step is capacity. The purchaser must be legally capable of entering into a contract; minors and the mentally incompetent are excluded in this case. Takem’s has given Ms. Walker the computer in exchange for her payments on her store account. Finally, the intention to enter into a contract has to be present. Ms. Walker signed a bill of sale, a security agreement, and a negotiable promissory note- which is an unconditional promise to pay a certain sum of money at a certain time in the future. Though Takem’s has the advantage to combat her claims, Tommy needs to ensure that his salespeople have not made any false statements or misrepresentations to Ms. Walker as this could have legal implications for the store and against the contract (Vaccaro, 1987). Ms. Walker is legally bound by the contract she agreed to in exchange for the computer; however if there has been any misrepresentations or false statements Ms. Walker may be able, with legal assistance, to call the contract into question

    Read More

  • Hapney V. Central Garage, Inc.: Case Study

    1536 Words  | 4 Pages

    Non-compete agreements are usually found in employments contracts in where a company wants to prevent their employees from working for a competing company. The focus of the non-compete agreement is to protect a company’s business interest and trade secrets but, a non-compete covenant must be laboriously drafted to follow the state’s regulation in order to be enforced in court. There is an enormous discrepancy when it comes to cases that deal with non-compete agreements since it deals with revising if the non-compete agreement was lawful to begin with; courts do not have a consistent approach to this. A lot of companies request the courts to enforce the covenant but, in most cases, the agreement is unenforceable due to the unethical and unlawful

    Read More

  • Critical Response: Critical Analysis Of The Most Ethical Dilemmas

    1053 Words  | 3 Pages

    The current situation appears to start out with the buyer’s perception that the seller is dishonest. The buyer asks about the mileage being set back. The seller doesn’t really respond to that comment, but moves past it. I think if he would have made a joke out of it, or made a statement that they don’t practice dishonesty, the seller could have gained more trust. Second the seller appears to be assuming the needs of the buyer. The seller is leading with questions like, “Do you need that much room?” The customer says that they don’t, but is it possible that they do want something more spacious? It is possible. The seller seems to think that the buyer is only buying for gas mileage. The seller is overlooking a key selling point, the buyer is getting into a car pool with their boss. It is probable that the buyer would unconsciously want to buy a car that would make a statement to their boss.

    Read More

  • Tucker: Tucker's Struggle In The Automobile Industry

    587 Words  | 2 Pages

    When analyzing the film Tucker, it is easy to see there are several external factors that contributed to his difficulty in the automobile industry. The first was really an intermingling of two threats, the threat of suppliers and rivalry. With the car industry being in the mature stage of the industry life cycle there were three major automobile manufactures and they controlled most of the market share in the industry. With them having such large market shares they also controlled much of the materials that went into manufacturing an automobile this included steel. Tucker faced this challenge when he attempted to buy steel to manufacture his vehicles and learned there was no steel to be purchased because the big three already controlled all of the available steel. From the assistance of Howard Hughes Tucker learned of a failing helicopter manufacturing plant that had in their possession more than enough steel to make the cars that Tucker needed to make. Tucker eventually gained access to the steel from the helicopter plant either through acquisition or merger th...

    Read More

  • Tick Tock By Dean Koontz

    930 Words  | 2 Pages

    After he pays he speeds up in his new car so he can arrive home.

    Read More

  • Key Factors In The Massachusetts Lemon Law

    504 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Massachusetts Lemon Law protects any used car, truck, van, or demonstration vehicle as has been defined by Massachusetts state standards. Under the Lemon Law, dealers are required to conduct any repairs that compromise the use or safety of the vehicle during the warranty period. If you caused these problems yourself, however, whether through negligence or making changes to the vehicle, then the dealer is not recovered to cover the repairs under the warranty. If the vehicle is purchased through a private part seller, then it is required that the buyers are informed of any defects that could compromised the use or safety of a

    Read More

  • Case Law Case Study

    1560 Words  | 4 Pages

    Nearly every aspect of law enforcement has a court decision that governs criteria. Most court rulings are the result of civil lawsuit towards a police officer and agency. However, currently, there is no law that mandates law enforcement driver training. When it comes to firearms, negligence by officers has resulted in a multitude of court rulings. Popow v. City of Margate, 1979, is a particularly interesting case that outlines failed firearms training by an agency. In this case, an officer chasing a suspect during a foot pursuit fired at the suspect, striking and killing an innocent bystander (Justia.com, 2017). The court ruled that the agency was “grossly negligent” of “failure to train” (Justia.com, 2017). As a result, nearly every agency requires annual firearms training and has written policy concerning the same. Officers must show proficiency in firearms use every year to maintain their certification. Many states even impose fines on officers for

    Read More

  • US V. 2007 Custom Motorcycle: Case Study

    1363 Words  | 3 Pages

    The purpose of this assignment is to review the case of the United States v. 2007 Custom Motorcycle. This case is about the ownership of a motor vehicle and who has the ultimate possession/control over it. This case was found in chapter 10, page 308 and 309 in the Sales and Lease Contracts section of the textbook.

    Read More

  • House V Bell Case Study

    1824 Words  | 4 Pages

    House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case, which originated out of a Tennessee trial court murder conviction and death sentence (Neubauer & Fradella, 2008). The case started with the murder of Carolyn Muncey late on the night of July 14, 1985, or in the early morning hours of July 15, 1985. Muncey disappeared from her home, and was found dead the next day, with her body having been dumped down an embankment and covered with brush and limbs. The defendant, Paul Gregory House, was seen in the area of the body dump site, on July 15, 1985, carrying a black rag, and reportedly coming up the embankment, in the area where Muncey’s body was later located (House v. Bell, 2006). Evidence collected from the body of

    Read More

  • The Statute of Frauds and the Uniform Commercial Code

    820 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...useless car to a junk yard to recover some loss, but the difference of the re-sale of the junk-car would be a significant loss. Though there were no adequate assurances to the contract, anticipatory repudiation is the only probable remedy for Jack. However, the outcome would weigh on the predominant factor test, which is met because Tom is covered as a merchant because he is operating in his usual daily business, and Jack is the buyer. The sole purpose of the contract was for Tom to sell Jack a car, and for Jack to buy a car from Tom. The UCC, though less stringent than the statute of frauds, does effectively regulate commercial transfers allowing the free market to operate without diminishing the integrity of trade.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Contract Law

    717 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since the elements were met to satisfy an actual contract being made, with promises albeit moral and legal, the behavior in which Johnny executed warrants a breach of contract on his part. Also to note is Johnny is not a merchant under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which defines a merchant as “a person who deals in goods of the kind or otherwise by his occupation holds himself out as having knowledge or skill peculiar to the practices or goods involved in the transaction” (American Business Law Journal, 1970). Had Mark been identified as a merchant, he would have been held to a different set of rules and Johnny would have been protected, but Mark is a casual seller and not held to a higher standard of

    Read More

  • Honda Case Study

    1283 Words  | 3 Pages

    Honda has established a program for its suppliers to strive for improvements in order to meet Honda’s requirements. The goals of the BP program are to improve the relationship between Honda and their suppliers, reduce manufacturing costs, and eliminate product defects. They accomplish these goals by focusing on 5 key areas: Best Position, Best Productivity, Best Product, Best Price, and Best Partners (Bounds and Arnold).

    Read More

  • English Speech Against Physical Punishment of Children

    438 Words  | 1 Pages

    gives in a buys the toy car. Now ask yourself who is in charge here,

    Read More

More about Case Study Tommy Vs The Car Dealer

Open Document