Case Study On Team Work

976 Words2 Pages

Introduction The team work helps the organization to improve their tasks and output efficiency. The team can work well only when all the members show their interest and motivation towards doing work collectively. The good team members usually make a strong working team. But, if the members show their personal concerns and standards in managing tasks, then the team will lose its strength. And at the end all the members will face the loss. In this case study Jane, Robert, Danny, Sharon and Liz were the part of a team, but they were from the different categories of the people (West, 2012, p. 36). Their interests and wills were more important, then the common goals and objectives of the team. All they were not serious at all about their presentation …show more content…

The team working needs many things to consider. The effective team working firstly needs a leader who manages the team members and decides the goal and objectives of the team. The leader can be selected by taking the opinion of all the team members. The leader should be the person who can work efficiently by taking other with him for a common cause. The second main thing is respect of others opinion, which was lacking in the case. Some wanted to make a play role, and others were convinced on making a brief presentation. It was not a good practice all at. So, try to “Respect your fellow team members. Be aware that each team member will have unique talents and ways of learning. Not everyone learns by the same process” (Learning effectively through Groupwork). The members should collectively decide the working plan with the help of the team leader. The third and most important thing is giving the proper time to the team task. In the case, all they had their own works and problems at the time of every meeting, which cause the poor team communication and collaboration (Paine,et al.,1990) . The fourth and the last thing is to remove the factor of personal negligence which cause the loss of the marks of the entire team because of individual’s mistake. In this case Danny was a lazy person who didn’t do anything for the presentation even he was not present on the day of

Open Document