Caoineadh Airt Ui Laoire Film Analysis

545 Words2 Pages

The films Bas Arto Leary and Caoineadh Airt Ui Laoire were based on the lament written by Eibhlin(Eileen in the movie) Dubh Ni Chonaill about the murder of her husband in the 1700. Caoineadh Airt Ui Laoire shows the viewer how a brave hero like Airt Ui Laoire could lose his life for resisting British imperialism in Ireland. Moreover, in Bas Arto Leary, Ui Laoire (Oleary) was killed for refusing to sell his horse and having an affair with his wife’s friend (Brid). Although there are some similarities in how both films tell the story of the lament, each film has a unique way of interpreting the story. There are similarities and differences in between the two films. In both movies the main character, Ui Laoire was murdered by the British (Morris’s men). Moreover, both films use a horse as to convey the message of Oleary’s death to Eileen. However, in Bas Arto Leary, Eileen try to take revenge, while in Caoineadh Airt Ui Laoire she did not. Moreover, in Bas Arto Leary, Ui Laoire was found alive before he suddenly drops dead, while in Caoineadh Airt Ui Laoire, Eileen found him dead when Although Bas Arto Leary was not the true source compared to Caoineadh Airt Ui Laoire, it portrays the lament successfully in modern way, but it fails to capture the spirit of the lament. Bas Arto Leary was made more modern by the use of cell phone. Yet we know from the reading of “Ar son an Náisiúin”: The National Film Institute of Ireland’s All-Ireland Films the Gaelic Athletic Association(GAA), “had authorized the filming” in 1948, and the lament was written in the 1700, so the use of cell phones in Bas Arto Leary has not basis in the lament. Furthermore, we learn from discussion #5 that Ireland did not have electricity until the 17th century, and cell phones were invented in the 18th century, so Bas Arto Leary could not have been based on the true

Open Document