CAP

1593 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Crime and punishment essay dostoevsky

Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment explores the themes of guilt and the consequences of committing immoral actions. Of all the deep, thought-provoking concepts put forth in Crime and punishment, the idea that guilt can be an adequate punishment more valid than any punishment executed by society as a whole is the most far reaching and supported by the novel. Crime and Punishment follows Rodian Raskolnikov’s life from just a few days before he commits two brutal murders to when he confesses his crimes and is convicted and sentenced to several years in prison. Initially, Rodian had successfully gotten away with the murder of two people. Raskolnikov’s guilt-driven madness has given him an immunity and even investigators he confesses to think he couldn’t be guilty. As a result, his guilt continues to feed on his conscience to the point where he is constantly miserable. Raskolnikov’s true punishment is the futility of his attempt to escape the guilt of his actions without confessing and feeling adequately punished. The primary consequence Raskolnikov suffers as a result of his crimes is guilt. The quote: “Freedom will lose its attractions. He’ll begin to brood, he’ll weave a tangle round himself, he’ll worry himself to death!” serves as an accurate descriptions of how he suffered from his actions. (Dostoevsky 324) Yet, Rodian does not worry himself to death, his suffering affects him and eventually causes him to confess his crimes, something that he would not have even considered doing in the very beginning of the novel. The quote demonstrates the two opposing options Rodian is able to take. He has the choice to evade punishment and retain his freedom at the cost of living with his guilt, or he can offer up his confession and seek socie... ... middle of paper ... ...harges on her and receive a far less severe sentences. She spends her time in prison overcoming her illiteracy and does not even recognize her crimes. In a way, her time in prison was never even punishment. She only ever begins to feel guilt when she realizes that she has been a burden to Michael, that she has completely destroyed his life and prevented him from living fully. When she finally achieved her goal of literacy, she spent her time reading about the holocaust, knowledge which lead her to understand her crimes. As her guilt grew with her knowledge, her suffering grew just as Raskolnikov’s does in Crime and Punishment, eventually leading her to seek her own redemption in death, when she commits suicide. This again, suggest how related guilt is to punishment; they are mutually assured. In order for punishment to exist, and not be torture, there must be guilt.

Show More
Related

  • Egoism in Crime and Punishment

    423 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Dostoyevsky's Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov's initial crime, failure, and acceptance of mistakes are his road to overcoming his ego, as well as self discovery.

    Read More

  • Imperfect Conscience in Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment

    564 Words  | 2 Pages

    A highly educated individual, avoiding the hardships of society while pondering the possibility of great wealth, Raskolnikov, in Fyodor Dostoevsky's "Crime and Punishment," frustrated with his immoral actions, suffers from an abrupt physical and mental breakdown after brutally mutilating a wicked pawnbroker. After this soul-scarring incident, the initial feelings of success in completing his mission quickly changes once he realizes possible flaws in his, otherwise considered, perfect murder. Raskolnikov's imperfect conscience finally comes to an emotional awakening once his saint, Sonya, an unintelligent prostitute, brings him the love, sensitivity, and inner serenity to help him confess to the murder he so coldly commits.

    Read More

  • Morally Ambiguous Characters in Fyodor Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment

    779 Words  | 2 Pages

    Often times in literature, we are presented with quintessential characters that are all placed into the conventional categories of either good or bad. In these pieces, we are usually able to differentiate the characters and discover their true intentions from reading only a few chapters. However, in some remarkable pieces of work, authors create characters that are so realistic and so complex that we are unable to distinguish them as purely good or evil. In the novel Crime and Punishment, Fyodor Dostoevsky develops the morally ambiguous characters of Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov to provide us with an interesting read and to give us a chance to evaluate each character.

    Read More

  • Comparing The Holy Bible and Crime and Punishment

    445 Words  | 1 Pages

    Although the novel begins by focusing on the crime itself, the majority of the book discusses Raskolnikov's struggle through denial and redemption after the murder has been committed. His own "greatness" leads to his denial of God, and his attempt to suppress his conscience causes insanity and sickness. However these negative consequences force him to acknowledge his rectitude and realize his need for confession.

    Read More

  • Svidrigailov Suffering

    605 Words  | 2 Pages

    The work Crime and Punishment, created by Fyodor Dostoevsky, express many different degrees of suffering. The Character Porfiry Petrovitch states that “Suffering, too, is a good thing.” Svidrigailov reveals to the reader the extent suffering can bring upon a person.

    Read More

  • Crime And Punishment - Style

    1384 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment, the character of Raskolnikov is one who may be considered evil or immoral for his actions, however his portrayal by the author is one that instills sympathy in the reader for the character due to his motives and personal, internal consequences he suffers for his crime of murder. There is considerable evidence supporting the view that Raskolnikov wants his theory surrounding the murder to be proven wrong, to get caught, and to be punished. This tells the reader that deep down, Raskolnikov knows in his heart what is wrong and right, and that he wants to be brought back down off his pedestal and enter back in to normal human society. Raskolnikov’s theory of the "superman" who is above all societal constraints and able to stamp out the weak and detrimental people in society for the common good, is one that is obviously skewed. This prompts Raskolnikov to doubt his reasoning for and consequent execution of the crime. He knows that his theory is wrong, but he has been created by the society in which he lives, which allows him to conjure up wild fantasies and delusions of grandeur. The sympathy Dostoyevsky enforces upon the reader for Raskolnikov is held by the overwhelming signs pointing towards the notion that he knows that he is wrong in his doings.

    Read More

  • Coetzee and Dostoyevsky: Self-Policing and Justice

    915 Words  | 2 Pages

    Crime and Punishment takes us in the puzzle centered on Raskolnikov, a young man in old Russia who commits murder and then after a lot of lies and deceit finally pays for his wrongdoings.

    Read More

  • Crime and Punishment

    1319 Words  | 3 Pages

    He tells us that Newton had the right to kill hundreds of men in order to bring to the world knowledge of his findings. Napoleon and other leaders created a new word. They overturned laws and created new ones. They had the right to uphold their new ideals, even if it meant killing innocent men. Therefore Raskolnicov believes that some “extraordinary” humans like himself have the right to oppose ordinary social laws in order to create a new social order.

    Read More

  • Good And Evil In Dostoevsky's Crime And Punishment

    1314 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky examines this behavior. Raskolnikov, a character who seems to be losing an internal battle between good and evil, morality and confusion, inhabits nineteenth-century St. Petersburg—a

    Read More

  • Resurrection of Lazarus in Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment

    452 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment, Raskalnikov undergoes a period of extreme psychological upheaval. By comparing this death and rebirth of Raskalnikov's psyche to the story of the resurrection of Lazarus, Dostoevsky emphasizes not only the gravity of his crimes, but also the importance of acceptance of guilt.

    Read More

  • Comparing Crime and Punishment and Notes from the Underground

    490 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Crime and Punishment, we see Raskolnikov caught between reason and will, the human needs for personal freedom and the need to submit to authority.  He spends most of the first two parts stuck between wanting to act and  wanting to observe.  After he acts and murders the old woman, he spends much time contemplating confession. Raskolnikov seems trapped in his world although there is really nothing holding him back; he chooses not to flee and not to confess, but still acts as though he's suffocation (perhaps guilt?)In both novels defeat seems inevitable. Both characters believe that normal man is stupid, unsatisfied and confused.  Perhaps they are right, but both characters fail to see the positive aspects of humans; the closest was the scene between the narrator of Notes from the Underground and Liza.  In this scene he almost lets the human side show, rather than the insecure, closed off person he normally is.

    Read More

  • Character Development in Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky

    1278 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his novel Crime and Punishment Fyodor Dostoevsky uses Raskolnikov as a vessel for several different philosophies that were particularly prominent at the time in order to obliquely express his opinions concerning those schools of thought. Raskolnikov begins his journey in Crime and Punishment with a nihilistic worldview and eventually transitions to a more optimistic one strongly resembling Christian existentialism, the philosophy Dostoevsky preferred, although it could be argued that it is not a complete conversion. Nonetheless, by the end of his journey Raskolnikov has undergone a fundamental shift in character. This transformation is due in large part to the influence other characters have on him, particularly Sonia. Raskolnikov’s relationship with Sonia plays a significant role in furthering his character development and shaping the philosophical themes of the novel.

    Read More

  • The Motif of Poverty Throughout Crime and Punishment by Dostoyevsky

    1228 Words  | 3 Pages

    Crime and Punishment revolves around Raskolnikov and his amplifying guilt after he murders the pawnbroker, Alyona. From the beginning of the novel his poverty is displayed in his living condition, which is further described by the “yellowish dusty wall-paper peeling off the walls” (Part 1. 3) and the sofa that Raskolnikov designates as his bed is “taking up almost the whole of one wall and half the width of the room, and with a print cover now old and worn into holes” (Part 1.3). Raskolnikov is disgusted by the way he lives and even more appalled by the depressing city of St. Petersburg that is full of unemployed drunken men and molesters. The repugnance of the city is further explained to have an “insufferable stench from the pothouses, which are particularly numerous in that part of the town, and the drunken men” (Part 1. 1). Raskolnikov’s opinion of the city is shown by having “an expression of the profoundest disgust” (Part 1. 1). The cities overall pessimistic charm sets a tone that Raskolnikov is greatly influenced by his low social class and will contain repercussions as the novel goes on. However, Raskolnikov has a pride that differentiates him from his surroundings and separates him from the society he lives in. His self-confidence gives him the illusio...

    Read More

  • Crime and Punishment Essay

    753 Words  | 2 Pages

    By the end of Dostoyesky’s Crime and Punishment, the reader is no longer under the illusion of the possible existence of “extraordinary” men. For an open-minded reader, and even perhaps the closed-minded ones too, the book is a journey through Raskolnikov’s proposed theory on crime. It is a theory based on the ideas that had “been printed and read a thousand times”(313) by both Hegel and Nietzsche. Hegel, a German philosopher, influenced Dostoyesky with his utilitarian emphasis on the ends rather than the means whereby a superman existed as one that stood above the ordinary man, but worked for the benefit of all mankind. Nietsche’s more selfish philosophy focused on the rights to power which allowed one to act in a Hegelian manner. In committing his crime, Raskolnikov experienced the ultimate punishment as he realized that his existence was not that of the “extraordinary” man presented in his theory. In chapter five of part three in Crime and Punishment, this theory is outlined by its creator, Raskolnikov. Such an innovative theory would clearly have placed him in the “extraordinary” category, but when he fails to meet its standards, by submitting to the common law through his confession, the theory crumbles right before the reader’s eyes.

    Read More

  • Decisions of the Conscience in Crime and Punishment by Dostoyevsky and Huckleberry Finn by Twain

    806 Words  | 2 Pages

    Within Crime and Punishment, the limit to Raskolnikov's mental capability, over certain thoughts, appears frequently. Raskolnikov is constantly battling with his conscience over the murder, before and after its committed. The results of this thinking mixed with the overall guilt and mental influence of the crime haunt him. While battling his conscience, Raskolnikov acquires an illness that makes him mentally weak and short fused. These side effects are a result of him passing the boundary of what his conscience can bare.

    Read More

More about CAP

Open Document