Bsbwor504 Case Study 1

303 Words1 Page

Kelsey Thacker
Case Study 2

The allowances given were underestimated and there wasn’t enough money budgeted to cover the amounts of the actual bad debts, 6% was too small.

The money presented was:

Year Total Sales % on Credit Credit Sales Allowance amount (6%) Write-off amount
2010 $1,000,000 60% $600,000 $36,000 $52,000
2011 $1,800,000 70% $1,260,000 $75,000 $96,000
2012 $2,000,000 75% $1,500,000 $90,000 $60,000 However if a 12% portion of accounts receivable is used then the numbers would look like this:

In 2010: ($365000x12%)+6000 debit balance=49800
$49,800 is the bad debt expense whilst $43,800 would be the allowance amount in the credit balance.

In 2011: 43800-96000 write off = 52200+(12% on 425000) = 103200
$103,200 is the bad debt expense whilst $51,000 would be the allowance amount in the credit balance. …show more content…

While using the allowance-based principles the better method is the Percent of receivables method because it looks at existing numbers such as existing credit or debit balances when creating the allowance amount, the percentage of sales method does not do this. The percentage of sales method runs into trouble because debts pile is and write-offs are overstated.

Using the aging of receivables

Open Document