Brutus Caesar Quotes Analysis

1043 Words3 Pages

Brutus Considers killing Caesar but has mixed feelings. Finally decides that it is the best option after he reads the fake letters. “Evil can come from good, just as poisonous snakes tend to come out into the open on bright sunny days which means we have to walk carefully.” He is loyal to Cassius because he agrees with Cassius and wants to kill Caesar.
Lucius He works for Brutus and he confirms tomorrow is ides of March. He introduces the conspirators. “Sir fifteen days of
March have gone by.” He’s loyal to Brutus. He works for him.
Cassius Him and his other followers conspire against Caesar. “Remember what you’ve said and prove yourselves true Romans.” He’s not loyal to Caesar he wants him dead.
Casca He’s one of Cassius’s followers. …show more content…

Calpurnia Calpurnia is preparing for the Holy run. “I’m here my, my lord.” She’s loyal to her husband
Because she watches out for
Him. She didn’t want Caesar to go out.
Antony He reassures Caesars not to fear Cassius. “Don’t be afraid of him,
Caesar. He isn’t dangerous.
He’s a noble Roman with a good disposition.” He’s loyal to Caesar because him and Caesar are close.
He’s also Caesar’s right hand man.
Soothsayer He told Caesar to beware of March 15th. “Beware the ides of March” He’s loyal to Caesar because
He warns him about the ides of
March.
Brutus He is torn between his emotions. “If it’s for the good of all
Romans, I’d do it even if it meant my death. Let the gods give me good luck as long as I love honor more than I fear death.” He’s loyal to Caesar all he wants the good of all Romans.
Cassius He’s trying to persuade Brutus to turn against
Caesar. “I’m glad that my weak words have provoked even this small show of protest from you.” He’s not loyal to Caesar
Because he planned on killing
Caesar.
Cicero He’s trying to put Casca’s mind at ease. “But men tend to interpret things however suits them and totally miss the actual meaning of the things themselves.” Loyal to Caesar because

Show More
Related

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare's, Julius Caesar, rhetorical devices are used throughout Decius Brutus’s speech to Caesar to persuade him to attend the senate, and ultimately meet his demise. Decius Brutus uses repetition to directly play into Caesar’s ego and convince him to show at an event he was previously very unsure of. Decius first uses repetition to make Caesar feel as if he were an irreplaceable addition to the senate. He addresses Caesar as, “most mighty Caesar…” (2.2.74) multiple times throughout his oration. The repetition of “mighty” draws Caesar’s attention away from the fact that he really must not go to the senate and instead focuses on why he must. Caesar is known to be easily persuaded by the promise of attention or rewards. Decius

    Read More

  • Brutus and Antony’s Use of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos in Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare

    1103 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ther gifts he asks “when comes another [as great as Caesar]?” (877) in order to make the crowd feel complete and utter guilt for their betrayal and anger towards the conspirators who killed their beloved idol.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Brutus Loyalty Quotes

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Considers killing Caesar but also does not want to. Finally decides that it is the best

    Read More

  • Were the Conspirators Right to Murder Julius Caesar?

    1069 Words  | 3 Pages

    Caesar should not be assassinated by the conspirators because they had personal reasons for hating him. Firstly, ...

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    535 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rhetorical devices have been around for many centuries, and they are used to convince and persuade people to believe in their cause. These strategies exploit individuals by influencing them to feel sympathy or trust the speaker. In Julius Caesar, a historic tragedy written by the prominent Shakespeare, Antony’s brilliant rhetorical strategies are used to trump Brutus and prompt the Roman people to unite with his rebellion against the unjust butcher of the beloved Julius Caesar.

    Read More

  • Study Questions: Julius Caesar Study Guide Questions

    709 Words  | 2 Pages

    He makes fake notes from the people and leaves them in his office so that Brutus will think Caesar is a bad person.

    Read More

  • The Audience's Perception of Cassius and Brutus

    2044 Words  | 5 Pages

    Caesar as he believes it is the right thing to do; he also tries to

    Read More

  • Brutus Speech Rhetorical Analysis

    739 Words  | 2 Pages

    in his speech mark antony uses a rhetorical question to make the crowd question brutus’s motives. he says to the audience at caesar's funeral “did this in caesar seem ambitious?”. he uses this rhetorical question to make the audience question if brutus actually killed caesar for being “ambitious”. Antony includes another rhetorical question in his speech questioning brutus's motives for he asks the crowd “was this ambition?” Antony uses this rhetorical question to further shake their belief of what brutus earlier told them in his speech. Antony expertly uses these rhetorical question to make the audience at caesar's funeral question everything brutus had told them about caesar and why he had to kill him. he adds rhetorical questions to make the audience question themselves if caesar was ambitious and if that's the reason brutus was murdered.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Leadership

    1204 Words  | 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar was the dictator of Rome in his prime. Some say his journey to the top was paved in corruption, other claimed he was a man of the people. His enemies knew to fear him for his ruthlessness. His followers adored him because everything that he had succeeded in was done for them. Unfortunately, his betrayal transpired by his senators who felt he had grown too powerful and stabbed him to death. However, Julius Caesar’s connection to the political world, his innate ability as an army general, and his desire to advocate for the rights of his people made him a great leader.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    384 Words  | 1 Pages

    In his play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare employs various rhetorical strategies such as direct address, repetition, and apostrophe in Antony’s eulogy to convince the crowd into believing that Caesar was a good ruler. His excellent use of rhetoric begins before he starts his speech through the establishment of familiarity. Before Antony begins his speech, he refers to the crowd as “friends, romans, [and] countrymen” to establish a personal connection, indicating the use of direct address (3.2.82). By referring to the crowd as “friends,” Antony removes any separation between him and the audience, establishing a close bond by choice. As it came first on his list, it emphasizes the importance of his friendship with the audience as friendship implies

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Essay: Brutus's and Antony's Speeches

    1039 Words  | 3 Pages

    Brutus's and Antony's Speeches in Julius Caesar. & nbsp; William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar is a tragic story of the dog and the manger.  After Caesar is killed Mark Antony, a good friend of Caesar, plots to revenge his bloody death.  He knows there is strength in numbers, and through a speech at Caesar's funeral, Antony plans to win the crowd of Rome and turn them against Brutus and the other conspirators.  Cassius is one of the leading conspirators and is weary of Antony; Brutus is confident that in message but similar in delivery, move the emotions of the people.  Brutus's and Antony's speeches differ in length, have similar ways of keeping the crowd's attention, and differ in tone.  & nbsp;                The first and most obvious difference in the two funeral orations is their lengths.  Brutus's speech is composed of 403 authoritative words; whereas Antony' on the other hand, has much more to say than Brutus anticipates.  His speech is split into six lengthy sections.  First, Antony counters what Brutus says by proving that Caesar was not ambitious.  The next two parts deal with Antony's finding of Caesar's will and Antony giving a little taste of what it contains.  Then, Antony sways the crowd's emotion from curiosity to pity when he tearfully re storm the houses of the conspirators, Antony brings them back to the will and tells them what Caesar has left for them, the people of Rome. & nbsp;                    Despite these drastic differences, the two orations are similar in a way essential to their effectiveness.  Brutus and Antony demand audience participation by asking questions and making comments they know will spark fire in the hearts of the Roman people anyone to defy him, ".I pause for a reply" (Act III, scene ii, lines 34-5).  The people reply, "None, Brutus, none!" (Act III, scene ii, line 36).  Once he knows he has won the people, Brutus states that he has the same death for himself (the same death as Caesar) when it will benefit Rome. 

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    Playwright, William Shakespeare, in the play Julius Caesar, utilizes many instances of rhetorical devices through the actions and speech of Caesar's right-hand man, Mark Antony. In the given excerpt, Antony demonstrates several of those rhetorical devices such as verbal irony, sarcasm, logos, ethos, and pathos which allows him to sway the plebeians. The central purpose of Mark Antony’s funeral speech is to persuade his audience into believing that Caesar had no ill intentions while manipulating the plebeians into starting a rebellion against their new enemies, Brutus and the conspirators.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Brutus And Antony's Debate

    1866 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rhetoric, diction and structure are all powerful tools commonly seen being used by people to persuade and manipulate or to justify and calm, to name a few. These literary devices are so powerful that they have the ability not only to sway one person 's thoughts but even perhaps the populace. In William Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar I believe that Act 3 Scene 2 can serve as commentary on the cycle between democracy and dictatorship. Even though there is no need to restructure the scene as the language stands out for itself the way it is, rearranging the structure of the scene allows the dichotomy in language to stand out. I believe that deconstructing and reconstructing Shakespeare 's language does not

    Read More

  • Moral Dilemma In Julius Caesar Research Paper

    419 Words  | 1 Pages

    If he stands in the angle of friendship, consider whether to kill Caesar，he won't do that,he will not break the friendship between him and Caesar. Then he should be directly rejected Cassius’s plot，it such a move may seem perfect, but there are inevitable drawbacks. As we all know that Caesar is very bossy,if he knew that the the Cause

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Assassination Essay

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another plan suggested by the group involved conducting the act of a gladiatorial show. This allowed the group to carry weapons, and would have made it easy to stab him with their swords without suspicion. Another plan involved assassinating Caesar at the elections where he had to cross a bridge prior to appointing magistrates to the Maritus Campus. This plan would involve pushing him off the bridge, then have others waiting below to kill him. A majority of the group went with the plan of killing him while he was sitting at the senate, since this would leave him exposed.

    Read More

More about Brutus Caesar Quotes Analysis

Open Document