Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strategies of reducing crime
Crime prevention approaches
Crime prevention approaches
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Broken Window theory has a familiar ring, perhaps because it mirrors, “Nip it, nip it in the bud” as chimed by the character Barny Fife during the 1960’s television series the Andy Griffith Show. The theory is closely linked with conservatives politically and sociologically as well as concentrating on social cohesion through strict ideologies of law and order. However, Broken Window theory is also based on ecological causes of crime that is known as criminology of place or environmental criminology (Schmalleger, F. 2015). Criminology of place allows that areas, due to ecological features such as architecture or geographic location can induce criminal activity. In 1982 in an article written by Dr. James Q. Wilson and George Kelling called Broken …show more content…
Police by focusing on the poor can be viewed as targeting those who cannot afford a defense. Shifting police resources away from other areas or even more severe crimes while failing to understand actual criminal motivations, does not serve humanity in the long run. Victimless crimes are given importance over white-collar crime with true victims as well just pushing criminals to go underground or to other neighborhoods, does not end crime just relocates criminal activity. Perhaps the greatest injustice of Broken Windows is not correcting the issues that led to the decline of the area. How does an are within a city become disenfranchised and in ruin thereby attracting and encouraging crime? What resources could have been utilized to revive an area, short of magnified arrests and focus?
Broken windows theory may serve some value once a city has lost site of a zone and allowed its decline thereby effectively reallocating resources to areas with high concentrations of crime. However, crime occurs in all neighborhoods, by focusing on poor declining areas may be better served by preventive measures. Broken Windows may be a short-term solution that may help to improve an area that has become crime ridden, but moving police focus on one area of town and then another as crime mapping may be counterproductive that may be realized by Chicago and
In the study, they neglect to factor in the financial needs of their subjects. The study of Broken Window was based on the results received from higher income neighborhoods; in those neighborhoods financial circumstances are not crucial to families. Financial factors vary from neighborhood to neighborhood and even from family to family within the same neighborhoods. Ignoring this financial need in the areas where the studies were done lead to fundamental misunderstandings in the theory. The study generalizes the outcome of one broken window. Having a broken window on any property does not automatically lead to more broken windows, like suggested by the results of the cars placed in California and the Bronx. The level of desperation of families due to their financial circumstances leads to increasing crime rates. When the economy is unstable, a lot of people become unemployed; people that still have the obligation of sustaining their families. This may lead them to turn to illegal activities for a fast extra source of income. In these situations, crimes involving robberies and drugs increase in
The broken windows theory, was proposed by James Q. Wilson and George Kelling (1982). This used broken windows to describe disorder within neighbourhoods.Their theory links disorder and unsociable behavior within a community leading to serious crime. Prior to theories such as broken windows, law enforcement and police tended to focus on the serious crime. However, Wilson and Kelling took a different view from this. They saw serious crime as the final result of a chain of events, which emerged from disorder. If we eliminated disorder, then serious crimes would not occur as mentioned by Mckee
...up the pockets of poverty that crime will be eased. Breaking up pockets of poverty is a geographical project that is not an easy fix. In order to explore how the city ended up with these pockets of poverty, we must go back many decades and begin with racial segregation.
Before the theory was enacted, there was a wave of immigrants migrating to New York City. The city was home to younger individuals that could be influenced positively instead of negatively. It was considerably a new era for change. The Broken Windows Theory came from realizing that disorder in a community leads to crime so, “If a window is broken and left unrepaired, people walking by will conclude that no one cares and no one is in charge” (Gladwell 152). Once people assume that there is no order, they start to believe that they can get away with committing criminal act whether it’s big or small. This leads to a pattern of increased crimes instead of a decrease. The Broken Windows Theory implies that crime is “contagious” and can therefore spread through the city. This can create a pattern in the community leading to a city filled with crime. It is not new for a city to repeat negative habits within its community. Friedrich Engels documented the city of Manchester and “the patterns of human movement and decision-making that have been etched into the texture of city blocks, patterns that are then fed back to the Manchester resident themselves, altering their subsequent decisions” (Johnson 199). Friedrich Engel’s study of the behavioral patterns emerging in cities correlates with the Broken Window Theory. The theory deals with minor problems leading to the invitation to more serious
Location is a significant factor that contributes to where the pattern of homicides occur in Chicago. This is because overtime particular areas have been developed due to gentrification in city areas including the Northern and Central sides, these changes occur due to influx of wealth. This leaves the Southern and Western sides to deteriorate as the houses and the areas aren’t well looked after due to affluent people leaving it that way causing a ‘slum-like lifestyle’ and low rent for those with low income. Therefore, a higher pattern of homicides in the Southern and Western sides of Chicago occur because those in lower classes tend to resort to violence and crime.
Shaw and McKay (1942) focused their research on the rapidly expanding city of Chicago Illinois in the early 1900’s. Cullen and Agnew (2011) stated that the population of Chicago expanded from 1 million people in 1890 to double that size within 20 years. According to Cullen and Agnew (2011) it was in this era of rapid expansion that researches begin to think differently about crime. Cullen and Agnew (2011) stated that the researchers began to think that the understanding of crime may not be found in the studying of an individual criminal traits but the study of the traits of the environment in which a criminal lives and interacts. According to Cullen and Agnew (2011) this led to a question in which researchers thought a possible solution of controlling and explain crime would be found in changing environments and neighborhoods rather than changing people.
Hot spot policing is based on the idea that some criminal activities occur in particular areas of a city. According to researchers crime is not spread around the city instead is concentrated in small places where half of the criminal activities occur (Braga chapter 12). Also, many studies has demonstrated that hot spots do show significant positive results suggesting that when police officers put their attention on small high crime geographic areas they can reduce criminal activities ( Braga, papachristo & hureau I press). According to researchers 50% of calls that 911 center received are usually concentrated in less than 5% of places in a city (Sherman, Gartin, & Buerger, 1989; Weisburd, Bushway, Lum, &Yang, 2004). That is the action of crime is often at the street and not neighborhood level. Thus police can target sizable proportion of citywide crime by focusing in on small number of high crime places (see Weisburd & Telep, 2010). In a meta-analysis of experimental studies, authors found significant benefits of the hot spots approach in treatment compared to control areas. They concluded that fairly strong evidence shows hot spots policing is an effective crime prevention strategy (Braga (007) .Importantly, there was little evidence to suggest that spatial displacement was a major concern in hot spots interventions. Crime did not simply shift from hot spots to nearby areas (see also Weisburd et al., 2006).
In 1990, William Bratton was hired as Chief of the Transit Department. Bratton's hiring was in response to Robert Kiley, chairman of the New York State's Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), belief that the subway system was in trouble. During the late 1980's, New York City was experiencing an economic downfall. The economy, in addition to rampant homelessness, panhandlers, unattended youths, robbers, and vandalism, resulted in a steep decline in the usage of the subway system. In order to clean up the subway system, Bratton employed zero-tolerance policing, or what has been commonly referred to as the "Broken Windows" theory. This theory was developed by George L. Kelling and James Q. Wilson and discussed in a 1982 of article of Atlantic Monthly. The "Broken Windows" theory simply argued that "just as a broken window left unattended was a sign that nobody cares and leads to more and severe property damage, so disorderly conditions and behaviors left untended send a signal that nobody cares and results in citizens fear of
This field of study is uncertain to affirm this kind of assumption. But all this discussion about Broken Windows Theory leads us to reflect why not try to prevent crime instead of act after the crime has been committed? The main idea of Kelling and Wilson was applied in this specific case of NYC’s subway and had been successful. The idea that the police have to work more engaged in a community is good for all sides. The ideal of prevention should be more disseminated in all branches because focus on roots of the problems. The main point for these strategy is do not wait until serious crimes occur to intervene, extremely opposite this, it is necessary deal with disorder behavior early and this form contribute with the development to all
There have been many contributors when it came to tackling anti-social behaviour and preventing crime however, the most influential contributors are Wilson and Kelling. They came up with the theory of broken window which will be further explain in this essay. This essay will outline the broken window theory, as well as explain what is meant by broken window. Finally it will give examples that exemplify the broken window theory. (Maguire, Morgan and Reiner, 2012)
I do believe that in lower income cities where criminal activity is more visible, it is up to our law makers to utilize more patrolling to maybe cut down on the crime activity. I also believe that the location where a person lives has a lot to do with crime activity. I can use for example, I live in a community where there is little to no crime reported verses more lower level neighborhoods, that are called “the other side of town” are high in drug usage, selling and more violent criminal acts.
The field of criminology has produced multiple theories, each that shaped the perception of how crimes occur in a neighborhood and by viewing these various impressions this can help explain why crimes occur. However, four criminological theories have developed the different perspectives of researchers and outlooks of the field. These approaches have enhanced society by allowing it to analyze crime by establishing an empirical foundation that way to assess which approach is most useful and regulate the difference between a good theory and a bad theory. Every method experiences level of criticisms from either researchers or public policies, however, the focus is only based on four principles that way there can be an assessment to decide which approach is viewed as right or wrong. In order, to determine which approach can be considered a good theory versus a bad theory there needs to be essential elements that give support for each theory. There needs to be criticism, however, with enough empirical evidence that can determine which
Throughout the research that Zimring provided, he was not able to explain any single type of theory that explains the crime decline in the 1990s. (Placeholder1) Inspector Zimring’s investigation indicates that many factors could have caused this phenomena. In conclusion, it is apparent that in order to understand crime rate increases and decreases, there needs to be expanded, ongoing research and gathering of statistics to explain the causes of past, current and future crime trends.