Brock Turner Punishment

1272 Words3 Pages

Criminals that commit the level one felony, rape, should be punished harsher. Rapist, like Brock Turner, can commit such a crime and still not be punished the way one should. Brock received six months in jail after raping and penetrating an unconscious twenty two year old woman. On January eighteenth of 2015 he had five different charges against him. Two of the charges were for rape, two for felony sexual assault and the last was for attempting rape. February second he pled not guilty to any of the accounted charges. While the two rape charges were dropped by prosecutors, Turner was still charged for the other three charges. Those three charges had a potential of fourteen years of prison. Judge Persky sentenced Turner to six months of jail …show more content…

Rape for a victim can be life changing in the way they see themselves or they way they now see the world around them. The trauma of being a survivor of sexual assault can cause ; depression, uncontrollable anxiety, nightmares, uncontrollable thoughts and suicidal tendencies. The emotional changes for them can also be drastic feeling of shock, anger and blame, a change in trusting people, helplessness and loss of control are just a few of the feelings.
The average punishment for convicted rapist is around nine years and eight months, usually only about five years and four months are being served. This punishment is not harsh enough, however rapist do not deserve the death penalty. Many people believe that the death penalty would decrease the rate of the crime being committed by a significant amount. People who fear death wouldn’t commit the crime and risk their lives, however rapist do not deserve an easy way out of their …show more content…

One opinion, who agrees with the death being a reliable outlate, states, “The justice system shows more sympathy for criminals than it does victims. It's time we put the emphasis of our criminal justice system back on protecting the victim rather than the accused. Remember, a person who's on death row has almost always committed crimes before this. A long line of victims have been waiting for justice. We need justice for current and past victims.” The opposite argument also stand out though, proving a valuable point in some cases. “While rape can be a very belittling and a traumatizing crime, believing the moral response to that is to end the life of the perpetrator does nothing to solve the problem, does nothing to help the victim, and does nothing for the health of society.
People are commonly emotionally invested in seeing criminals given just deserts, and their emotional high can lead them to demand and crave undue and brutal punishment when it's not warranted. A thief can potentially ruin a person's life far more, especially identity theft, but nobody is craving for the blood of thieves, they are only given

Open Document