Brassica Rap Mendelian Inheritance Patterns

1735 Words4 Pages

We used Brassica rapa, a fast plant the rapidly reproduces, in an experiment that we performed a monohybrid cross and a dihybrid cross. We hypothesized that in the monohybrid cross, the F2 generation of Brassica rapa will follow Mendelian inheritance patterns and show a phenotypic ratio of 3 anthocyanin positive to 1 anthocyanin negative. If the F2 generation follows Mendelian inheritance patterns, then out of 1105 plants, 828.75 will be anthocyanin positive and 276.25 will be anthocyanin negative. For the dihybrid cross we hypothesized that the F2 generation of Brassica rapa will follow Mendelian inheritance patterns and show a phenotypic ratio of 9 Anthocyanin positive dark green to 3 anthocyanin positive yellowish green to 3 anthocyanin …show more content…

These results gave us a chi-square statistic of .06787 and with a degree of freedom of 1, this .06787 is below the critical value of .05 so therefore the results do follow typical patterns of inheritance. This means that our hypothesis for the monohybrid cross was correct, the F2 generation follows Mendelian inheritance patterns. In the dihybrid cross, the observed results were 487 or 55.7 % of the plants had anthocyanin dark green leaves, 166 or 19% of the plants had anthocyanin yellowish green leaves, 136 or 15.6% of the plants had no anthocyanin dark green leaves, and 85 or 9.7% of the plants had no anthocyanin yellowish green leaves. These results gave us a chi-square statistic of 21.703 and with the degrees of freedom at 3 this is still well below the critical value of .05 and therefore the dihybrid cross does not follow typical patterns of inheritance. This means that our hypothesis for the dihybrid cross was rejected, the F2 generation of Brassica rapa did not follow Mendelian inheritance patterns. The results show that the monohybrid cross did follow Mendelian inheritance patterns, while the dihybrid …show more content…

This information supports our hypothesis for the monohybrid cross, but it does not support our hypothesis for the dihybrid cross. In the monohybrid cross, it was expected that we would get a phenotype ratio of 3 plants with anthocyanin for every 1 plant with no anthocyanin. The plants with anthocyanin were easy to differentiate because of the purple color that is shown in the phenotype of plants with anthocyanin in them (Webb 2014). The results we observed were relatively close to this ratio, and the chi-square statist tells us that the monohybrid cross did follow mendelian inheritance patterns. In a different experiment done with Brassica rapa, it was found that when a set of plants with anthocyanin present were crossed with a set of the same species of plant but without anthocyanin present, the phenotypic ratio observed was 3 to 1 (Hayashi et al. 2010). This information just reinforces the idea that a monohybrid cross between Brassica rapa with anthocyanin and without anthocyanin does produce a F2 generation that follows Mendelian inheritance patterns with a 3 to 1 phenotypic ratio. The dihybrid cross we conducted was done with the anthocyanin gene, and the color gene. The dihybrid cross did not follow Mendelian inheritance patterns, so this leads us to believe there must have been a source

More about Brassica Rap Mendelian Inheritance Patterns

Open Document