Ethical Dilemma In the story, Bowen was a member in a vacation program for Morgan Stanley, where he burned through sixty days climbing the cold and hazardous Himalayas in Nepal. He set out for this trip with his companion Stephen, who was an Anthropologist, their watchmen and a few Sherpas. Amid their climb, Bowen and Stephen experienced a New Zealander who had with him a shoeless, scarcely dressed, Indian man who happened to be a Sadhu, who right now was depleted and hypothermic. The New Zealander was determined to finish his objective and conveying the Sadhu with him made it relatively difficult to trek any further. Stephen and Bowen attempted their best to enable the Sadhu by helping him to remain warm. Without a doubt enough, the Sadhu …show more content…
Consequentialists are driven by the results of an activity instead of the thought processes of it. In this specific case, the mountain climbers subliminally extemporize "Prideful person Consequentialism" to arrive at a conclusion. Self-seeker Consequentialists trust that the best great is their own, accordingly, fulfilling their wants preceding helping another person. Utilizing this important, abandoning the Sadhu would be the proper activity, as that would profit the more noteworthy number of individuals towards accomplishing their objective of making it to the summit. Utilizing this basic leadership strategy, the Sadhu is contrarily influenced, as he would be deserted, while the mountain climbers will have the capacity to keep on reaching their summit speedily. In the story, Bowen feels regretful for abandoning the Sadhu after subliminally utilizing this system. Subsequently, it isn't perfect to utilize consequentialism to unravel this problem. Deontology is portrayed as "obligation", "commitment" or "lead based morals". Deontology assesses the ethicality of conduct in view of the inspiration of the chief, and as indicated by a deontologist an activity can be morally right regardless of whether it doesn't create an adjust of good finished wickedness for the leader or for society in general. Utilizing deontology would generally profit the Sadhu in this circumstance. The numerous gatherings of mountain dwellers would not respect the Sadhu any uniquely in contrast to they would treat each other. Leaving the Sadhu in the mountains to make do without anyone else demonstrates that the mountain climbers did not see the Sadhu with deference and did not treat him with pride. Deontologist's commitment is ensuring a human life, which is substantially more profitable than achieving the summit to accomplish an
Deontology diverges from consequentialism because deontology concentrates on the rightness or wrongness of the actions themselves instead of the consequences. There are different types of deontological theories. According to Kant, theoretical reasoning helps us discover what we should believe whereas the practical reasoning tells us what we should do. Morality falls under theoretical reasoning. In Kantian deontology, motives matter. Rather than consequences, it is the motive of an action makes that action morally right or wrong. Likewise, if an action intends to hurt someone, but eventually it benefits the other person, then it does not make that action morally right. All in all, deontology comes down to common-sense: whether it is a good action or a bad
Also, since deontologists place a high value on the individual, in some instances it is permissible not to maximize the good when it is detrimental to yourself. For example, one does not need to impoverish oneself to the point of worthlessness simply to satisfy one’s moral obligations. Deontology can be looked at as a generally flexible moral theory that allows for self-interpretation but like all others theories studied thus far, there are arguments one can make against its reasoning. One objection to deontological moral theory is that the theory yields only absolutes and cannot always justify its standpoints.
In conclusion we can say that consequentialism is flawed in the fact that the borders of a wrongdoing, to bring about a better good, are limitless. We can conclude that evil wrong doing can be construed as bringing about a better happiness for what the evil doer contrives to be for the better good of the people. For the most part we have seen that deontology’s view of good will in the individuals act can lead to moral justification. The captain and his men must make this moral decision to kill or not, if they do kill the Indians, their actions must be left to higher authority to deal with.
According to deontology, people have an obligation that is imposed upon them by the duty to perform certain actions without due consideration on their consequential outcomes, (Braswell, McCarthy & McCarthy, 2011). This explains the instances where it is morally justified to perform a certain action whose pain is greater than the collective pleasures that can be derived from it, (Braswell, McCarthy & McCarthy, 2011). One of the major contributors to the deontological ethical theory is Emmanuel Kant. Deontologists include other ideologies that are inherently lacking among the consequentialist theories, particularly the utilitarianism. These aspects include the duty to act as well as a consideration of the intention to do what is right against what is wrong, (Braswell, McCarthy & McCarthy, 2011). Deontological theorists argue that good intentions or good will is what informs the moral worth of an action and not just a consideration of the
Deontology is a non-consequentialist theory. While consequentialism believes the ends always justify the means, deontologists claim that the rightness of an action should not be solely dependent on maximizing the good, even if that action goes against what is ethically right. For example, four critical conditioned patients in a hospital need a different organ to survive and a healthy man comes into the hospital for a check-up, would you kill the healthy man to save the four? According to consequentialism, the doctor should take the healthy man’s organs to save the others, thus maximizing the good. However, we all know that it is ethically wrong. Deontology objects to this way o...
Since the beginning of mankind, it has been the need to attain a specific goal, which has driven humans to work hard. Without any ambition, humans would not be inspired to overcome adversities and challenge themselves to become increasingly adaptable. When one is motivated by certain factors in their environment, the probability of them being satisfied with the results of their deeds depends on the moral value of their inspiration. If the individual is aware of the fact that their deed is immoral, then no matter how dire their circumstances which forced them to perform the actions, they will not be content. The irony establishes itself in the fact that those characters who are motivated by a cause bigger than themselves, tend to be happier,
Stubbornness is a horrible character flaw of the man in the story. He discards all warnings of the weather that he received from those with experience. Full of himself and ambition the man embarks on his final trail. He sights no big problem regarding the weather and is sure of the fact that he will meet with his fellows in the camp in planned time. Soon however the cold hit harder and harder. The absence of heat grew as the man’s strength and confidence shrunk. Here the words of his advisors began to make way into the front of his mind, the theme as well ever-present. The theme that suggested the potential of nature compared to that of man’s. The theme which so clearly exhibited how blind stubbornness would not lead to stoicism and victory but rather painful demise. Witnessed in this story was just that theme. The miserable man was killed not by the dreadful cold but by his own free will and lack of knowledge. Had he taken just a fragment of the native’s advice or read the warning on the wall inside the heat-infiltrated house perhaps he would breathe another breath, step another step, or live to tell of his encounter.
Deontological moral systems are characterized by a focus upon adherence to independent moral rules or duties. In order to make the correct moral choices, we need to understand what duties and morals exist for us as individuals and as a society and how we need to follow them. We will be behaving morally when we follow our duty, and behaving immorally when we fail to follow our duty, no matter what the condition of that duty may be. Ty...
On considering the consequentialist theory we need to evaluate the consequences of the situation and action is needed to be taken which seems to be apt. To some extent we Conseqentialist theory works to argue but Deontologist theory works even more better in this situation
“I took a carotid pulse and found that the sadhu was still alive…. It was fruitless to question why he had chosen this desperately high route instead of the safe, heavily traveled caravan…. Or why he was shoeless and almost naked, or how long he had been lying in the pass. The answers weren’t going to solve our problem.” Bowen McCoy did what any compassionate and humane person would do; he ‘attempted’ to help someone on the verge of death.
The theory of deontology concentrates on the appropriateness of the act versus the results of the act (Powers, 2005, pp. 496-499). Because of this, the correct action may or may not be enjoyable for the agent. Also, others may or may not approve of it and it may create pleasure, riches, or pain. Consequentialist believes that the end justifies the means, yet the deontology says that doing something right is not always good if it is going against what is deemed as moral. Let’s relate this to a hospital situation: three critically ill patients are in ICU and they all need organs to survive. A healthy young man c...
In this assignment we will be identifying an ethical dilemma an individual has experienced. We will begin with a short introduction of what an ethical dilemma is, moving on to providing brief details of the dilemma an individual has experienced. We will then go on to selecting one ethical theory, to show how it can help an individual understand and deal with the situation when placed within, followed by a conclusion.
It only emphasizes the right actions and right intentions, with the importance of good and benefit by the actions. Deontology is considered as morally good because of the characteristic itself, not because of the product of action is a good thing already. Deontology can be very religious from the divine commandment is part of law. Deontology and Utilitarianism is pretty compatible with each other. Lying is unacceptable, for example, if someone lies in order to bring about desires. Deontologists live in a universe of moral rules, like, killing innocent people, stealing, cheating, or keeping promises. Everyone has a duty to do the right thing, even if it came out badly. Not only to have be motivated, also do the right thing. It is making a decision to whether you do good or bad in life. If we do something on our own choices, we know that is was our duty to do so. According to Kant, “The belief that people out not to be used, but ought to be regarded as having the highest intrinsic value, is central to my ethics, as is having a motive to do what is right,” (Kant
A nonconsequentialist act is the deontology theory. Deontology is a moral obligation or duty to act relating to a principle or rule. Deontology requires the act of humanity. It is never the treatment as a means to an end. A rule of deontology is that one should act in a manner that maxim the act intending to develop the act as a universal law. However, deontology can obligate someone to act in a way that seems wrong and unethical (Mossier, 2013). It is a rigid theory that fails to capture the complex issues that arise. Therefore, one would need to act as everyone would act in that specific situation. When applying the deontology theory, one should focus on the will of the person acting, the person’s intention of carrying out the act, and the rule according to which the act is carried out. Deontology can impact human life within society through the application to the principal in gender equality in areas of employment, health care, and the education system. The
A deontologist asserts that you should do your duty even if you or others suffer as a consequence. Deontology is seen as an obligation to protect regardless of the impact it has on others, whether it be people, animals, and/or the environment and so on. “Deontology focuses on the duties and obligations one has in carrying out actions rather than on the consequences of those actions” (Mosser, 2013). According to deontologist Immanuel Kant, when doing your duty as a deontologist there are “categorical imperatives” that should be followed. In other words there are exceptions for why one is not taking action. “All imperatives command either hypothetically or categorically” (Kant,