More handpicked essays just for you.
Boston marathon terrorist bombing attack
The boston marathon bombing essay
The boston marathon bombing essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Boston Marathon is a tradition held annually on Patriots’ Day and it attracts hundreds of thousands of people to the 26 mile run from Hopkins, Massachusetts to Boston’s Back Bay Neighborhood. On April 15, 2013, the race was set to mark the 117th anniversary of the marathon. All was well until five hours into the race, Boston became the target of a terrorist attack when two bombs detonated 12 seconds apart from each other. The two bombs which had been placed inside backpacks containing pressure cookers that were filled with pellets and nails, were placed near the finish line where the crowd was watching the race (Boston Marathon bombing of 2013, 2014). The first bomb detonated on the north side of Boylston Street which was less than half a block from the finish line. The second bomb went off 12 seconds later about 600 feet from the first bomb.
The explosion covered about 15 square blocks with three bombing victims dying on scene and around 264 people seriously injured. The gory crime scene was filled with injured runners and spectators who had lost limbs, contained abrasions, or received traumatic brain injuries caused by the shrapnel from the bomb. Soon after the explosions, first responders transformed the regular medical tent set for runners into an
…show more content…
The page-long written warning relayed contact information of the Tsarnaev family and cautioned the U.S. of Tamerlan’s association with radical Islamists (Viser, 2014). After the warning, Tsarnaev was brought in for questioning by the FBI. The interview and investigation led to Tsarnaev’s name being entered into TECS, a database used to alert the agencies when a suspect has left or reentered the country. After no links to terrorism were revealed, the FBI closed its investigation in June
The events of March 5, 1770 should and have been remembered as momentous and predictable. Perhaps not the night or city specifically, but the state of affairs in Boston, if not throughout The English Colonies, had declined to the point that British troops found themselves frequently assaulted with stones, dirt, and human feces. The opinions and sentiments of either side were certainly not clandestine. Even though two spectators express clear culpability for the opposing side, they do so only in alteration of detail. The particulars of the event unfold the same nonetheless. The happening at the Custom House off King Street was a catastrophic inevitability. Documents from the Boston Massacre trial, which aid us in observing from totally different perceptions. The depositions of witnesses of the event prove to be useful; an English officer Captain Preston and a colonial Robert Goddard give relatively dissimilar details. In spite of these differences, they still both describe the same state of affairs.
In unit six we learned about anthropology and entomology and how forensic scientist use it different cases. Even though entomology was not that useful in The Oklahoma bombing case, anthropology was extremely useful for identifying the victims. Since it was an explosion, Forensic anthropologist had to study different remains of the victim's body and use different techniques (such as examining bone development) to identify who they were. For example, the death toll was originally 169 people (one person higher) than it is now because of an unidentified left leg was found and they couldn’t find the body it originally came from. Later, medical examiners compared the size of the tibia of the leg to other victims right leg. Finally forensic found
Clay Dillow’s “To Catch a Bombmaker” was published by Popular Science in October 2015. This article educated the reader about the FBI’s Terrorist Explosive Device Analytical Center— a key aspect in the fight against terrorism. Dillow focused on ethos and logos to strengthen the validation of his claim concerning the importance of the TEDAC and was successful in persuading the reader to believe in its significance as well. He used expert quotes from FBI agents to give the article credibility; In addition, he presented statistical data in a clear and concise manner and gave many factual cases in which the TEDAC facilitated the government in their pursuit of terrorist and bomb makers. As proven by Dillow in “How to Catch a Bombmaker,” the Terrorist
To the people of Oklahoma it was a traumatizing moment for all, many lost families, dozens of cars were incinerated and more than 300 buildings were destroyed and caused about $652 million worth of damage. The “OKBOMB” affected hundreds of people; it killed “168 people -- 19 of them children -- and injured more than 500.” (CNN.com) Within 90 minutes of the explosion, McVeigh was pulled over 80 miles north of Oklahoma City by a state trooper who noticed McVeigh's missing license plate. He was later arrested for having a concealed weapon.
The bombing of the World Trade Center was nicknamed “the Big One”, causing a sixteen alarm fire. FEMA’s Incident Commander (IC) arrived on the scene at 12:48 and began assessing what needed to be done: over 50,000 people needed to be evacuated, thick black smoke was filling the building and could not stopped, numerous people were trapped in elevators and personnel on the top floors were breaking glass raining it down on personnel on the ground.
"the shot heard round the world"-Ralph Waldo Emerson concord hymn. No this doesn't mean in 1770 all of the people in the world heard the shot. It means that this incident was known about throughout everywhere in the world. Ralph Waldo Emerson meant to say this to tell the significance behind the shooting and the outcome of the shooting as well. Many people also believed that this was the thing that's started it all. People thought that because of the outrages and protesting caused by the massacre it caused the start of the revolutionary war. The infamous Boston massacre was caused by colonists protesting unfair British actions and defensive British soldiers try to contain the crowd then sparking the revolution.
On March 5th, 1770 the colonists were going to protest against the British rule because they were being unfair to the colonists, with taxes being passed without the colonists’ approval. The proclamation of 1763 didn’t help stopping people from settling across the Appalachian mountains even though people fought for it. Also each house had to house and feed a soldier. Many other taxes on different items also caused colonists to be angry. Many started to protest one of these protests had the colonists in front of government building with weapons the British soldiers then fired killing five and injuring others. There was not a massacre on March 5, 1770 in Boston because there was not a massacre on March 5, 1770 in Boston because less than ten colonists
I am writing to express my opinion about the events that occurred March 5, 1770 in Boston. I feel the blame rests entirely on the colonists. I have three main pieces of evidence to support my view.
There were up to 264 people injured in this marathon bombing. They were treated within 26 hospitals. On the scene of the bombing there were so many people with detached limbs or so many people with massive cuts that first responders were having to use lanyards as tourniquets. There are 16 people known that lost a limb in the
The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770 when a mob of civilians confronted the British in Boston after nearly two years of tension between the colonists and the British soldiers in Boston. In the fall of 1768, many British soldiers were stationed in Boston to maintain order, and enforce taxes on account of the colonists protesting the Townshend Acts with a fiery passion. The Townshend Acts were imposed by Parliament and Prime Minister Charles Townsend in 1767 to continue to raise funds to pay off Britain's enormous debt. The Townsend Acts suspended New York assemblies, forced the colonists to board British soldiers, placed duties on imported goods, such as glass, paint, paper, lead, tea, etc., and allowed customs officials to enter any ship or house they deem suspicious of
The Boston Massacre was a fundamental event at the beginning of the American Revolution. The massacre became part of anti-British propaganda for Boston activists and fed American fears of the English military in both the North and South. The Boston Massacre was the first “battle” in the Revolutionary War. Although it wasn’t until five years after the Boston Massacre that the Revolutionary War officially began, the Boston Massacre was a forecast of the violent storm to come.
Violence and the forcefulness of the British also justified the American colonists’ decision to wage war and break away from Britain. The violent and forceful reactions from the British towards situations like the boycotting, confrontation, and the Boston Tea Party motivated the colonists even more to break away from the British. The violent and forceful tactics the British use to resolve a situation is not the best strategies because it can be used to promote anti-British propagandas. For example, is the Boston massacre. According to document three, a crowd of Boston boys and men started to violently confront the British soldiers. As a result, the soldiers were frightened and decided that they can defend themselves by firing into the crowd,
Terrorism is a broad category and there are different types of terrorism in the world. Two of the more dominant types of terrorism are domestic terrorism and international terrorism. Domestic terrorism is “the unlawful use of force or violence by an individual or a group that is based and operates entirely within the United States and its territories, acts without foreign direction, and directs its activities against the elements of the U.S. government or population” (Schmalleger, 2013 p.562). One of the most recent examples of domestic terrorism in the United States would have to be the bombings at the Boston Marathon, which took place on April 15, 2013. An article written by the Los Angeles Times on April 24, 2013, which was eleven days after the bombings, describes what the offender and his brother did, and has information that pertains to their arrest and the hun...
This chapter provided information from the trial of Captain Thomas Preston. The chapter asked the question, “What really happened in the Boston Massacre”. Chapter four focused on the overall event of the Massacre and trying to determine if Captain Preston had given the order to fire at Boston citizens. The chapter provides background information and evidence from Preston’s trial to leave the reader answering the question the chapter presents. Although, after looking through all the witnesses’ testimonies some might sway in Captain Preston’s favor, just the way the grand jury did.
Throughout the novel, Hersey shows the problems that six specific humans are going through after the bomb is dropped. “By the light of a lanturn, he has examined himself and found: multiple abrasions, and lacerations of face and body, including deep cuts on the chin, back, and legs; extensive contutions on chest and trunk; a couple of ribs possibly fractured” (Hersey 46). In th...