Blaming Haig for the Slaughter of the Somme

2151 Words5 Pages

Blaming Haig for the Slaughter of the Somme

1. Source A is a balanced source. It is from a book called Field

Marshal Haig, which was written by the historian Philip Warner in 1991

makes this source Secondary Evidence because it was written some time

after the war. It contains both pro Haig and also anti Haig parts.

Here are some of the pro Haig points,

"If the criterion of a successful general is to win wars, Haig must be

judged a success". This statement praises General Haig in the way of

saying that he was a success at winning wars. "Haig's military methods

were in line with the ideas at the time". This brings out the thought

of that what Haig did was infact what he was supposed to do at the

time. But in this source there was some anti Haig comments such as,

"The cost of victory was appalling". This comment brings out that even

though he was a successful General at winning wars it also says that

the loss of men in the war was dreadful. "The full horrors of the

First World War". This sentence refers again to the loss of life in

the war and the other terrible things that happened. Overall source A

is a balanced source but what about source B.

Source B is from Colonel J.H. Boraston who was Haig's personal

secretary during the war and he said this in 1922, which makes this

Primary Evidence even though he said this after the war. "The Battle

of the Somme was a great triumph for the genius of British

leadership". This statement is praising the General by saying that he

was a genius. This could be because he was Haig's personal secretary

and that this source is biased towards Haig. The main and only view

that this source shows us is that this is pro Haig. So the only

similarities they have in common is that they both contain pro Haig

references but source A contains some anti Haig views.

2. In source C which is taken out from a Secondary School textbook

Show More
Related

  • Book Review of William Prochnau's, Once upon a Distant War

    466 Words  | 1 Pages

    One of the key strengths of this book is the author's first-hand knowledge of the people, places, and events that he is writing about. He also supplemented this first-hand knowledge with extensive interviews. In one example, he elaborated on the "chain of command" in Vietnam, which began with General Paul Harkins (and William C. Westmoreland) to the CINCPAC (Admiral Harry Felt) and from CINCPAC to Washington. "Not once in their four years of mutual agony in Vietnam did Harkins's successor, General Westmoreland, pick up the telephone and call his commander-in-chief, President Lyndon B. Johnson. Westmoreland did not have the authority, he told me."(169) This information came directly from an interview with Westmoreland. There are other anecdotes similar to this with each contributing to the extensive nature of the book's detail.

    Read More

  • Black Hawk Down - Summary of the book as written by Mark Bowden

    2108 Words  | 5 Pages

    He noticed that things were being done differently from the other setups, which had been false. This time they were packing more ammo and the commander came out to see them off. The troops were being sent in because warlords were allowing their people to starve to death. The world had sent food, and the warlords hoarded it. The world has decided to stop this.

    Read More

  • Haig as a Successful Commander

    621 Words  | 2 Pages

    as facts go - Haig was that far away. The rest of the source is

    Read More

  • Lyons-Blame In The Mirand Case

    237 Words  | 1 Pages

    It is likely that Martina Toole could maintain a claim against Lyons-Burke for negligent supervision because Toole was under the physical custody of the school when she was attacked by a fellow student, and thus the school had a duty to protect her. Lyons-burke had the duty to adequately supervise Martina Toole and her attacker, Ivy Toxicon, because it had physical custody of both students. At around 5:30 PM on the day of the attack, both students were in the process of waiting for departure at the only exit at the school. Just as in the Mirand case, the attack happened near an exit during dismissal. There are two facts that differentiate this case from Mirand: the attack happened after school hours and it may have technically happened off

    Read More

  • Planning the Battle of the Somme

    565 Words  | 2 Pages

    Planning the Battle of the Somme On 1st July 1916, Haig and Joffre planned a joint attack on the German lines near Bapaume (although Haig would have preferred to fight further north). The action was designed to relieve some of the strain on Verdun. Haig was quite hopeful that it would break through the German lines and bring the Allies victory. Artillery Bombardment The attack was preceded by an eight-day artillery bombardment, in which 1537 British guns fired 1,723,873 rounds. The sound of the bombardment could be heard in England.

    Read More

  • Dereliction of Duty, by McMaster

    942 Words  | 2 Pages

    Dereliction of Duty, by McMaster, is a book written to explain the why and the how of the United States becoming involved in the Vietnam War. The author gives military and political reasons for this involvement and how the decisions were made by the nation’s leaders, who led not with honesty and integrity, but through mistrust and deceit. This group, who led this nation into war, involved the President of the United States, his military and civilian advisors, and the Joint Chief of Staff. What happened can be summed up in this statement from McMaster, "The war in Vietnam was not lost in the field, nor was it lost on the front pages of the New York Times or the college campuses. It was lost in Washington, D.C." H. R. McMaster was a West Point graduate and attended the University of North Carolina.

    Read More

  • Operation Barbarossa: Hitler's Strategic Folly and Its Implications

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    Introduction: On 22nd June 1941, Adolf Hitler launched the largest military task in history named Operation Barbarossa where in a display of betrayal and treachery, he invaded the Soviet Union. Lasting a gruelling 6 months in unforgiving Russian weather, Barbarossa saw the Red Army defeat the Germany Nazi party in the prime of Hitler’s dominance over Europe. In a demonstration of Hitler’s overconfidence and arrogance, the Germany army failed to defeat the Soviet Union due to poor leadership and guidance, personal values getting mixed with political issues and a lack of preparation for the challenging Russian conditions. Operation Barbarossa comes under the analysis of 3 criteria’s of the Jus Ad Bellum Just War theory including Proper Authority

    Read More

  • Taking Sides: Was WWII Solely Hitler's Fault?

    976 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ian Kershaw is correct when he argues that while Hitler was responsible for the execution of the German foreign policy that inevitably led to World War II, Hitler was not free from the influence of outside forces. Kershaw, a professor of history at the University of Sheffield, is a structuralist. Structuralists generally believe Hitler cannot be held solely responsible for World War II and that he was “was a product of the environment he helped to create”. When it comes down to specifics, the structuralists tend to emphasize different aspects; for example, one may focus on the effects of socioeconomic pressure while another may focus on the lack of a coherent plan (343). Kershaw’s article draws from many aspects of structuralism and delivers a sufficient comprehensive argument in his excerpt.

    Read More

  • Scapegoating As An Example Of Scapegoating Hitler And The Nazis

    169 Words  | 1 Pages

    Scapegoating is the action of blaming a person for things they did not do. Scapegoating can, and often is used as a form of self defense. Many Children learn to scapegoat in order to push blame to someone besides themselves. Most adults don't completely drop that habit as they get older because just like kids, adults don't like to put blame upon themselves. In life there are many examples of scapegoating, for example one case of scapegoating was Hitler and the Nazis. That was a perfect example of scapegoating, Hitler and the Germans used their power to blame the economic and social problems of their nation on the Jewish population. This allowed Hitler to place his nation's problems on somebody besides for himself. Just like a child, Hitler

    Read More

  • Was Hitler Responsible For The Holocaust?

    678 Words  | 2 Pages

    Eleven million dead. Fifty-five percent were Jews. The Holocaust was responsible for the death of 6.1 million Jewish people. It is one of the most important events in human history, but it is starting to be forgotten. Without the identification of those at fault and the remembrance of the Holocaust, history is more likely to repeat itself. Although blaming any one person for the Holocaust may seem like an impossible task, the top three most responsible parties are Hitler, Minor Nazis, and the SS.

    Read More

  • How Did Hitler Feel Guilty For The Holocaust

    1201 Words  | 3 Pages

    Furthermore, when it comes to the Holocaust, we sometimes may ask ourselves this question, do Germans feel guilty for what Hitler did to those innocent Jews? The answer to this question may not be very clear, but some of the Germans feel sorry of what their President did and how they agreed to do what he asked them for. In a New York Times article by Amanda Taub and Max Fisher, they talk about how many Germans are ashamed of what Nazi Germany did. For instance, Mr. Björn Höcke states, “Germans were ‘the only people in the world to plant a monument of shame in the heart of its capital,’ he said, referring to a memorial to murdered Jews in Berlin” (Taub and Fisher 2). The idea of being a German who may be one of his family members killed and murdered millions of Jews may make many Germans feel guilty and ashamed. The memorial that they put in Berlin refers to their acknowledge of what they have done to those Jaws.

    Read More

  • Mental Problematic Consequences of Warfare

    945 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ength and clear up the stress that would have prevented soldiers from thinking clearly otherwise.

    Read More

  • How Does War Change People

    224 Words  | 1 Pages

    “He was unprepared. Twenty-four years old and his heart wasn’t in it. Military matters meant nothing to him. He did not care one way or the other about the war, and he had no desire to command, and even after all these months in the bush, all the days and nights, even then he did not know enough to keep his men out of a shit field” (O'Brien 291).

    Read More

  • Morant and Handcock as Murderers or Scapegoats of the Empire

    1054 Words  | 3 Pages

    Morant and Handcock as Murderers or Scapegoats of the Empire The legend that Morant and Handcock were Australians wronged by the British army is, indeed, a legend.[1] As commented by Australian historian Dr Craig Wilcox, Australia’s only soldiers ever to have been shot by a firing squad following a court martial, Lieutenants Harry ‘The Breaker’ Morant and Peter Joseph Handcock were justly dealt with. The myth regarding the harsh, unjust treatment of both men and the association between the Morant legend and Australian nationalism is seemingly naïve and doubtful. However conflict of Morant’s personality remains prominent amongst historians.

    Read More

  • Importance Of Discipline In The Army

    836 Words  | 2 Pages

    By violating simple guidance put forth by the Army Chief of Staff, is a direct smack in the

    Read More

More about Blaming Haig for the Slaughter of the Somme

Open Document