Black Liberation Theology Analysis

1968 Words4 Pages

The concept of black liberation theology is a concept that requires us to scratch away at the surface of religion to uncover a new and radical approach to understanding faith and doctrine in the face of a legacy of oppression, persecution and white dominance over the black community; whilst forcing us to look at history, politics and religion all in the same sphere to grasp the fundamental question on what it means to be black and have a relationship with God. It is in itself a growing movement that is attempting to break away from the shackles of white supremacy towards a notion of religious freedom that is both tangible and metaphorical, whilst reinforcing that although we live in a modern age where the law tells us that that we are all …show more content…

As part of this argument he clearly outlines that there is a white God and a black God and it is the responsibility of ‘black theology to show that the black God has nothing to do with the God worshipped in white churches’ (Cone, 1990, P62). This is an attempt to make the gospel relevant to the struggles of his community with an aim ‘’to teach people how to be both unapologetically black and Christian at the same time.” (Black Liberation Theology, in its founders words (July 17, 2011) 5 Minutes 5 Seconds). Through this process he aims to enable the black community to form a theology that is unique to black needs and free of the restrictions put into place by white theologians who have monopolized doctrine and engrained white purpose into it. Cone does this by directly confronting the historical facts of segregation and slavery to reinforce a somewhat active and militant approach to overcoming the injustice experienced by blacks. He fuels this movement through discourse by making doctrinal references in his book Black Theology & Black Power such …show more content…

As part of this ongoing struggle Wogaman further critiques Cone by highlighting that he cannot escape the idea that Christianity is solely concerned with liberation and that without it, it could only ever be a symbol of white supremacy and exploitation. If this were the case then in a way it would imply that the message of Jesus in relation to unconditional love and salvific emancipation would be rendered false. Cones lack of maneuverability in relation to this is further amplified by his constant referral to Jesus as black. ‘’He is black because he was a Jew. The affirmation of the Black Christ can be understood when the significance of his past Jewishness is related dialectically to the significance of his present blackness" (Cone, 2006, P. 123). In saying this he is of course making the argument for an ontological affirmation of Jesus’ blackness, and as a result of this blackness Jesus has become a metaphor for the oppressed blacks of America, to which his obligation is also exclusively

Open Document