Biblical Apologetics
Methods, Definitions, and The Basic
Since its birth until today, Christianity has been in the context of “pluralism” that
the beliefs are very diverse (Carson 270-272) . These conditions are of course become serious
challenge to the claims of truth and the existence of Christianity. However, these challenges
have led to a response from believers who gave birth to Christian apologetics.
The word " apologetics" is derived from the ancient Greek word apologia which generally
means “defense ". The verb form is Apologoumai which means “doing a defense ".
(Sproul, Gerstner dan Lindsley 20).
So, Christian apologetics is primarily a defense of the doctrine and practice of the
Christian life of the person who do not believe. As a defense of the Christian faith effort,
apologetics is closely related to the problem methods he uses. As in a war, strategy is an
important requirement to win the battle, as well as in apologetics, the method is a vital
element in the effort to win souls for Christ. This statement does not mean that the effort of
believers through apologetics is a decisive factor in the success of evangelism.
The Bible clearly states that only the Holy Spirit regenerates the unbeliever and makes it
accepts Christ. (Hoekema 48)
However, as Christians who become co-workers of God, we are called to participate
in getting the best apologetics method we can do in certain situations. We must remember
that the Holy Spirit does not work contrary to our efforts, but through our efforts.
Towards the end of the twentieth century, Steven B. Cowan may have made a recent
classification of the methods of apologetics. He divides apologetics existing methods with a
distinguishing cr...
... middle of paper ...
...th and Rationality. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1983.
Pratt, Richard L. Menaklukkan Segala Pikiran kepada Kristus. Malang: SAAT, 200.
Ramm, Bernard. Varieties of Presuppositional Appologetic. Grand Rapids, Zondervan, 1961.
Sproul, , R.C., John Gerstner and Arthur Lindsley. Classical Apologetic: A Rational Defence of the Christian Faith and a Critiques of Presuppositional Apologetic. Grand Rapids, Zondervan, 1984.
Til, Cornelius Van. In Defense of The Faith Vol 2: A Survey of Christian Epistemology. Philadelphia: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1969.
—. "The deffense 77." Wesminster Theological Journal 57 (1995): 126-128.
Till, Cornelius Van. "The Methodological Objective of a Biblical Apologetics." Wesminster Theological Journal 57 (1995): 126-128.
Wood, W. Jay. Epistemology : Becoming Intellectually Virtuous. Downers Grove : Inter Varsity, 1998.
Cowan, S.B., & Spiegel, J.S. (2009). The Love of Wisdom: A Christian Introduction to Philosophy . Nashville, Tennessee: B&H Publishing Group.
As our first year of apologetic class, we started out with the basic idea of apologetics. The root word of apologetic, apologia, means “ To speak in defense “ and it is often used in religious matters. The purpose of apologetic is to give a solid and valid defense against the questions that are thrown against the christian society. We give such defense by stating the facts that provide support to the christian statements and views. As a christian, we are supposed to be able to explain our faith as it is said in 1 Peter 3:15 “ But in your heart set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give answer to everyone who asks you to give reasons for the hope that you have. But do it with gentleness and respect.”. We defend our faith not only to have a solid base, but also in order to help those who are in search for truth.
... analyze historical significance without me telling them what to think. This way the students could possibly see the argument in a more tangible way, see how and why the two sides differed, and both sides’ basis of justification. The students could then independently decide which side they actually favor.
McManners, John. "The Oxford History of Christianity." The Oxford History of Christianity. New York: New York Oxford Press, 2002. 28.
Inc. Doctrine of the Person of Christ. Volume II. 1970. The. Gruden, Wayne. Systematic Theology.
Jesus, a name known by billions throughout the world. To each, this name means something different; savior, friend, philosopher, prophet, teacher, fraud, fake, liar. Some even believe that He is just an imaginary character from the minds of those who wrote about Him. The Westminster Dictionary of Theology describes apologetics as, "Defense, by argument, of Christian belief against external criticism or against other worldly views" (Apologetics 31-32). Though there are still many mysteries that surround the ongoing debate about Christianity, evidence can now prove some of what Christians took by faith before. Now, more than ever, there is information to prove the existence of this man that walked the earth more than two thousand years ago. Little remains of His life and works except for that which is contained within the pages of the Holy Bible. Throughout the past century alone, there have been numerous discoveries, both scientific and archeological; to further prove the existence of a man called Jesus and reinforce the Bible as a legitimate historical document. The validity of Christianity and Jesus Christ himself has been the center of religious controversy for centuries. Though His identity has not and probably never will be proven, He did exist. This paper will use apologetics to prove this so. Sufficient evidence proves the existence of Jesus and forms a firm basis for Christianity.
A Natural Theology for Our Time, Charles Hartshorne, La Salle, Ill. Open Court, 1967, pp. 116-20
...hal. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Called to Love: Christian Witness Can Be the Best Response to Atheist Polemics." America 198 (2008): 23. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 8 Dec. 2013.
Hindson, E., & Caner, E. (2008). The Populer Encyclopedia of Apologetics. Eugene: Harvest House Publishers.
Russell, Bertrand. “Why I Am Not a Christian,” in Introduction to Philosophy. 6th edition. Perry, Bratman, and Fischer. Oxford University Press. 2013, pp. 56-59.
W. Andrew Hoffecker. Building a Christian World View, vol. 1: God, man, and Knowledge. Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co., Phillipsburg, New Jersey : 1986. William S. Babcock. The Ethics of St. Augustine: JRE Studies in Religion, no. 3.
A Christian apologetic method is a verbal defense of the biblical worldview. A proof is giving a reason for why we believe. This paper will address the philosophical question of God’s existence from the moral argument. The presuppositional apologetic method of Reformed thinkers Cornelius Van Til and John Frame will be the framework. Topics covered here could undoubtedly be developed in more depth, but that would be getting ahead, here is the big picture.
Kerr, H. (1990). Readings in christian thought (2nd ed.). H. T. Kerr (Ed.). Nashville: Abingdon Press.
Russell, Bertrand. “Why I Am Not a Christian,” in Introduction to Philosophy. 6th edition. Perry, Bratman, and Fischer. Oxford University Press. 2013, pp. 56-59.
When one fully gives himself to God, but has not receive the Holy Spirit, he must just keep trusting God that His word is true and that He will do the work. Also one can expect temptation just like Jesus did. When the Holy Spirit comes, He does not leave quickly. When one seeks the Holy Spirit when He is already there, it grieves Him. One should be prayerfully watchful and seek to be an open channel instead of seeking for more power.3