The story of Beowulf contrasted a mix of characters that range from good to evil. Throughout the story Beowulf, the focus was heroism. He was young and heroic representing the “good” in every one of his endeavors. Beowulf was the knight and shining and armor by showing leadership, bravery, and respectful to all. His first renowned battle was with a creature that goes by the name of Grendel. Grendel embodied the darker side of humanity specifically because Grendel is a decedent from the Biblical Cain. The authors used Grendel as a metaphor which is why he displayed so corruptly, he is portrayed as the “evil”. Both Beowulf and Grendel embodied what they were destined for in the book. It vividly highlighted their role in the story readers know that Beowulf is good and Grendel is bad. While Beowulf and Grendel seem to cut from two different clothes they share similarities.
Beowulf personified the meaning of a hero in every story. He
…show more content…
Beowulf who was destined for greatness is a structure of the perfect human being. He possessed a great amount of strength, courage, and attractiveness. He was the shown respect from his peers. People looked up to him and valued his time. Grendel on the other hand didn’t receive such mercy. Grendel only acts of what he knows. He doesn’t know friendship and love, but he does know loneliness. His instinctual reaction to anything happy or enjoyable is demonic, which is why he slaughters the Danes because they play loud music, laugh together, and represent brotherhood. He doesn’t understand the values of family and friendship. Grendel embodies the harsh reality of what humans could be. Even though he is portrayed as a monster, he shows his emotional side throughout the story. The constant repulsion of Grendel doesn’t help him understand the wrong he is doing. It is self-fulfilling prophecy; Grendel is the result of Cain’s actions and because of them he suffers in a lonely
For ages, humanity has always told stories of the classic struggle between man and monster. The battle between Beowulf and Grendel is a prime example of this archetype, but is Grendel only purely a monster? In his article “Gardner’s Grendel and Beowulf: Humanizing the Monster”, Jay Ruud makes a point that Grendel is a hybridization of both monster and man, particularly in John Gardner’s novel Grendel. In the poem Beowulf, Grendel is depicted as a purely evil monster who terrorizes Hrothgar and his people, but the novel provides a more humanistic backstory to the fiend. Throughout the novel, Grendel tells of his internal struggle between his thoughts of filling the role of the monster versus attempting to make amends with the humans. This conflict
In the poem, Beowulf, Grendel is depicted as a monstrous, evil villain that possesses a few human-like qualities: such as the ability to walk on two feet. However, his most notable characteristic that occupies his mind and body in the poem is the constant mindset and actions of primitive human tendencies. This quote conveys Grendel’s primitive ways as the humans perceived it. “The monster’s thoughts were as quick as his greed or his claws: he slipped through the door and there in the silence snatched up thirty men, smashed them unknowing in their beds and ran out with their bodies…” (Raffel 8). His lust for blood of the human race, alongside their Christian views, forced Beowulf and others to view
We have a concrete hero character in Beowulf, and a concrete villain in Grendel. We see this as a theme throughout the epic poem. The dichotomy of good versus evil is the fundamental backbone of this piece of literature. It is so significant due to the fact that everything that happens in this book is someway related to good versus evil. If Beowulf wasn’t so good at heart, he would not even be enticed to leave his homeland and go help the danes. Without the drive in Beowulf 's heart to do what is right, all of his heroic moments of glory would not exist. Once this is pointed out to the reader, it becomes so clear that one could wonder why the book isn 't just named: “Beowulf, a Story of Good vs. Evil.”.
Ordinarily, Beowulf’s first steps in his quest begin with his brawls with Grendel and Grendel’s Mother. Grendel is the first challenge for the mighty hero to encounter; he is a giant beast with incredible brute strength, and cunning. The many assaults he waged on the mead hall caused atrocious pain to the Danes. Heaney writes, “So Grendel waged his lonely war, inflicting constant cruelties on the people, atrocious hurt. He took over Heorot, haunted the glittering hall after dark” (Heaney 164-67). These acts of evil are enough to get Beowulf to sail to Denmark. Nevertheless, the good in him needs to erase this inherit evil from the face of the earth. Grendel is a spawn of something stronger and more evil, he is a child of hell. This is Beowulf’s first encounter with such a sinister power. He fights the monster in the mead hall and prevails, Heaney concludes, “Before morning he [Grendel] would rip life from limb and devour them, feed on their flesh; but his
An innocent, joyless, outcast lurks in the depths of the earth. He is feared by all due to his violent behavior and thirst for humans. Stories about this monster stretch across lands, intriguing the one and only Beowulf. In this notorious Epic, Beowulf, translated by Seamus Heaney, Grendel is the Frankenstein of this poem, the Joker of this time period, the Lord Voldemort of this book. Basically, Grendel is the villain and when there’s a villain there’s a hero. Our hero today is Beowulf, who challenges Grendel and he trounced not only Grendel but Grendel’s mother as well. Not only are Grendel and his mother villains but they also played the role of being the outcast/scapegoat. Symbolically they play the role
There are differences between Grendel in the novel, Grendel, and the Grendel from Beowulf. Grendel from the novel is into philosophy, teaches himself of human characteristics, and has deep thoughts of on the events on the events in his life. Grendel in Beowulf, is animalistic, cruel, and is thoughtless. Even though both the novel and the epic poem deal with the same character, the differences are great between them. The similarities between both Grendels are that they both are bloodthirsty, and described, but that’s where they typically end. This could be because the author of Grendel, John Gardner, decided to have the character from the poem, but wanted to have his own ideas on why Grendel is the way he is.
...ash between good and evil. Beowulf is a representation of a Godly figure, possibly Christ, whereas his enemies represent figures of darkness, possibly Satan. Due to his battle with Grendel, Beowulf realises the true abilities of Gods power and develops into a more Saint like character who is more concerned with giving help rather than Gaining fame. He seeks Gods guidance, but looks to pagan ideals when he deems so. Although he never completely takes complete advantage of Gods power, he does earn the fame and glory that he fought bravely for.
Beowulf begins with Grendel attacking the Danes out of vengeance and hatred. Grendel is the relative of Cain which means that he is outcast to eternal darkness as punishment for the crime of Cain killing his brother Abel. Therefore, when Grendel hears laughter in the hall named Heorot, he is angry and a little envious, so he goes on a killing spree in order to put an end to the warriors’ happiness. Because of Grendel’s attack upon the Danes, Beowulf arrives in order to put an end to the killing spree: “And now alone I shall settle affairs with Grendel the monster, the demon” (Donaldson, p.8). The author offers no other solution to solving this issue with Grendel but battle, and after the battle is fought and Beowulf wins, Grendel’s hand is preserved as a trophy. Beowulf is rewarded with gifts for his courage, and now the Danes are at peace.
Though these two stories are told from opposite perspectives, Grendel and his counterpart from Beowulf are almost exactly interchangeable in both action as well as thought, since both characters’ main conflict, as well as the climax, are perfectly symmetrical. How could they not? They are both the exact same character, the same monstrous quadruped that terrorizes the same Danish kingdom. The amount of similarities present is insurmountable. Both renditions of Grendel go through isolation, are subject to insurmountable suffering, as well as sharing a sense of incredulous hatred towards mankind.
Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia said “this poetry emphasizes the sorrow and ultimate futility of life and human helplessness before the power of fate.” Which puts into perspective why Grendel is the anti-hero and the protagonist in Grendel. Its because of how mankind treats each other and their actions which makes them look a lot more abusive then Grendel. In this comparative analysis, Grendel is an anti-hero, a protagonist, and an antagonist based on humans and Beowulf is the hero and protagonist because of Grendel.
While internal and external conflict plays a major role in these two stories, the battle between good and evil is the main struggle in the books. In Beowulf, Grendel and is family just come from a dark place. Grendel is like the “ captain of evil” and has no sympathy and is very unforgiving (Beowulf 744). On the other hand, Beowulf is the good guy. He sailed across an ocean to help people in need. Beowulf put his life on the line to protect the people and had no problem when he “brought down the hell-brute” (Beowulf
A great man with strength, bravery who is loved by all his people, a man with wise devotion with such pride. Beowulf, battles two demons, first the man-eating Grendel, then Grendel's bereaved mother, defending the Danes from these vicious killers. After returning to Geatland and nobly refusing to steal the throne when his uncle King Hygelac dies, Beowulf ends up becoming king anyway after Hygelac's son, Heardred, is killed in battle. In the sequel of Beowulf, the story is being told in the poem was how powerfully perfect Beowulf was as a hero. Adverse, to how the story was told in the movie, Beowulf was not the loyal, admirerable hero people thought he would’ve been.
In both John Gardner’s Grendel, and the poem Beowulf, there are significant differences between characters, and the way they are portrayed in each of the tellings. The interpretation of a hero is usually altered in order to fit the audience, such as, Saddam Hussein in America is made out to be this monster whereas, in his home country Iraq, he is looked at as a hero and idolized by some. In each telling, Grendel and Beowulf have many similarities in how they are described in each writing, but each character is also shown in a different light in each of the writings.
In history, evil men have reigned supreme across many cultures. Some people say that being evil is inherent in every human. If this is true, then writing may be the ultimate way of releasing hatred of the world without hurting anyone. In Beowulf, all of society's evil men can be personified within the demons of Cain. The main demon presented in Beowulf is Grendel. Grendel personifies the exact opposite of what the Anglo-Saxons held dear. Beowulf, the story's hero, is the embodiment of what every Anglo-Saxon strove to become in their lifetime. Grendel is constantly angry, afraid and unsure of himself; while Beowulf is fearless and loyal to his king.
Grendal, a descendant of Cain, is one of the main antagonist of the poem Beowulf. He lives under an inherited curse and is denied God’s presence. Throughout the story Grendal causes enormous grief and fear to the people of Herot. After so much pain and agony the king of Herot, Hrothgar, sends for the protagonist of the poem, Beowulf. He is a Geat and the epic hero of the poem. The wide variety of distinctions between Grendal and Beowulf is what develops the climax of the composition. Beowulf kills Grendal, so he is honored by the people of Herot for his heroic act. Since Grendal and Beowulf play opposite roles in the poem, Beowulf, they let the reader know how contrasting characters can develop the plot of the story.