Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Problems with racism in literature
Papers on racism in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The ignorance of Captain Delano in Benito Cereno can be accredited to his racist convictions that guide his perception of the ship’s perilous situation. However, is Delano at fault for his racism? When rethinking the racism in Benito Cereno under the context of Althusser’s theories on ideology, racism is an ideology implemented on the subject through the social institution of slavery. Delano’s actions and thoughts throughout Benito Cereno prove that his racism is a result of a socially imposed ideology. His actions and thoughts also challenge the modern ideals of racism that place the blame for racist attitudes entirely on the racist subject. Delano is the subject of a racist ideology and has been forced into that ideology through the social …show more content…
Delano’s actions are representative of the ideology, but Delano’s actions also convey his own personal convictions. Upon first boarding the ship, Delano perceives the men’s action of polishing hatchets as a “peculiar love in negroes of uniting industry with pastime” (Melville 40). It is a fallacy in reasoning to assume that forced manual labor would be something to love or consider a pastime just because a person is a certain race. Delano acknowledges how it is a peculiar idea to consider those ideas to be truth, but he ignores that fleeting moment of clarity and returns to the ideology he knows as truth. When facing the faults of his ideology, Delano turns away and acts as if he has no idea that there is anything wrong. By choosing to not reject racism, Delano embraces it by choice. Ideology does hold immense power over him, but he chooses to bend his will to coincide with that power rather to reject it and stand for something that would right or different. Even considering that his ideology might have flaws is too much for Delano to bear. The ideology of racism takes away the humanity of the slaves and the accountability of those enslaving them by attributing this idea of loving forced labor to the slaves. Beyond his immediate observation of their work, he considers the group he encounters to have “the raw aspect of unsophisticated Africans” (Melville 40). By using the word “raw”, Delano is …show more content…
The power enacted on him under Althusser’s ideology is escapable through understanding the condition and situation that the ideology has placed him in. However, Delano does not take the chance for to change or consider change. After Don Benito and Delano escape, Delano asked Benito “‘you are save; what has cast such a shadow upon you?” To this, Don Benito replies saying “‘The negro’” (Melville 107). At the moment, Delano is forced to consider the implications of what Don Benito says, but instead, “there was silence, while the moody man sat, slowly and unconsciously gathering his mantle about him, as if it were a pall. There was no more conversation that day” (Melville 107). Delano refuses his opportunity to accept blame and fault in his racisit ideology and falls prey to the racism that surrounds him. The power of ideology is overwhelming to those who are weak in character and integrity, like Delano. A fundamental aspect of Althusser’s ideology is that “what is represented in ideology is therefore not the system of the real relations which govern the existence of individuals, but the imaginary relation of those individuals to the real relations in which they live” (695). This is significant because it rethinks the idea of ideological power being based just in
The slave narratives written by Olaudah Equiano and Frederick Douglass, were important pieces of literature, helping to bring to the life the harsh realities of slavery. Equiano and Douglass, documented their experiences as slaves, to in hopes to connect with white audiences, showing them the immorality and hypocrisy of slavery. While both writers aimed to highlight the inhumanity of slavery, hoping it would lead to abolishment, Douglass and Equiano had different approaches. Both writers were influenced by different eras: Equiano’s writing is influenced by the Enlightenment Period, while Douglass was influenced by Romanticism. Comparing the styles, Douglass’ narratives are stinging, while Equiano’s narrative seems to be more appeasing. However, this has more to do with the influences of their time, than the character of either man. Contrasting styles of both men, echoes the contrasting philosophies of Romanticism and Enlightenment; different but one paves the way for the next.
In 1805, seal hunter Amasa Delano came across a ship call the Tryal that he mistook for a slave ship. Unknown to Delano, The slaves aboard the ship had already risen up and taken over the ship, killing the captain and most of the crew, and simply feigned slavery so as not to get caught. In author and historian Greg Grandin’s The Empire of Necessity, the slaves aboard the Tryal took part in a new era where for the first time, the tables turned, and the oppressed became the oppressors. Throughout his novel, Grandin argues that among men, there will always exist oppressors and oppressed. According to the author, every human has potential to become a slave in some way, as slavery is a necessary evil of mankind.
The fight for racial equality is one of the most prominent issues Americans have faced throughout history and even today; as the idea that enslaving individuals is unethical emerged, many great and innovative authors began writing about the issues that enslaved people had to face. Olaudah Equiano was no exception. In his work The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, he attempts to persuade his readers that the American way of slavery is brutal, inhumane, and unscrupulous. Equiano manages to do this by minimizing the apparent differences between himself and his primarily white audience, mentioning the cruelties that he and many other slaves had to face, and the advantages of treating your slaves correctly.
Equiano carefully crafts his words to show rational fear forming an argument instead of a horror story. He makes it clear that he is only afraid due to the brutality the men show, not because he is to work, or because he is frightened of the men themselves. QUOTES. In this sentence, Equiano both continues to refute the notion of Africans as savages and demonstrates their work ethic. This sentence appeals himself and his argument to the audience. He does not condemn Europeans for their brutality towards Africans, nor explain it graphically. The manner in which he expresses European savageness in this excerpt is not off-putting, yet still showcases its incorrectness. Additionally, by appearing aghast at their behaviour, Equiano makes it clear Africans are not accustomed to such actions and are not the beasts Europe sees them as. Ultimately through careful selection of words, he is able to argue against slavery without being accusatory and combats African
There are other contrasting aspects of the stories that call for attention. Most significantly Benito Cereno – ultimately – portrays slaves as evil and Babo as the mind behind the cunning plan that deceives Captain Delano. The reason for this one-sided representation is naturally the fact that we experience the story from Delano’s point of view. In the beginning, we perceive Babo as the typical docile, helpful, and faithful servant so often portrayed in other slave characters such as Stowe’s Uncle Tom and Jim in Twain’s Huckleberry Finn. Babo is more than just a slave; he is a “faithful fellow”, “a friend that cannot be called slave” . And despite all the underlying hints of a slave insurrection, Delano does not grasp their meaning. Examples are the slaves’ treatment of the Spanish sailors and the hatchet polishers , but in Delano’s narrow-minded world, only the white man is capable of conceiving plans of ‘evil’. And when he – and the reader too – finally sees “the mask torn away, flourishing hatchets and knives, in ferocious piratical revolt”, he is embarrassed and “with infinite pity he [withdraws] his hold from Don Benito” . From this moment on, Babo is a malign devil and Melville removes speech from Babo’s mouth. This strengthen our opinion of Babo as ‘evil’ even more, for how can we sympathise with him without hearing his version of the story? Apparently, Melville proposes no other alternative for the reader than to sympathise with the white slave owner Don Benito, whom Babo so ingeniously deceives.
... Interestingly, it is the innocent minds of children who are not totally corrupted by these ways of thinking, that help Douglass continue his goal of reading. The heartless act and "irresponsible power" of holding a slave is an evil practice that contradicts the natural good of a human soul. This narrative gives one a new perspective on the evils of slavery and the terrible way it affects everyone who is involved.
However, through a more careful and close observation of this segment, this revolt goes beyond the simple cultural divide and exposes the deeper, underlying theme of the entire novel as a whole: tyranny. Through this act, the slaves set forth a brutal cycle of tyranny and oppression, which, upon first glance, appears to be likely to lead to their liberation. And, although they do eventually receive ‘freedom’ from their imperial masters, the black inhabitants of the island are continually held down by whomever is in power at the time. In terms of this segment and chapter, the slaves see an opportunity to seize the freedom they so desperately desire and believe they deserve. However, when they do achieve this sense of freedom, which can be represented by their successful raid of the plantation house, they immediately engage in the vices of the white men by drinking the liquor in the basement and acting in an uncivil manner.
Francisco Franco was the dictator of Spain from 1939 to 1975, including the time of WW2. Perhaps he was better known as “El Caudillo,” translated into English as The Leader. He was born and raised in Spain. He was a very brilliant military general who led Nationalist rebels in defeating the Spanish government during the Spanish Civil War. Although he was viewed as a Fascist Dictator, he strongly opposed communism. He was an extremely important figure in the course of world history.
"The Life of Olaudah Equiano” is a captivating story in which Equiano, the author, reflects on his life from becoming a slave to a freeman during the 19th century. Through his experiences and writing, Equiano paints a vivid picture of the atrocities and cruelties of European slavery. Ultimately through his narrative, Equiano intends to persuade his audience, the British government, to abolish the Atlantic slave trade as well as alert them of the harsh treatment of slaves. He successfully accomplishes his goal by subtly making arguments through the use of character, action, and setting.
The novel The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano exists as an extremely important work in the abolitionist movement in England. As an 18th century narrative written by a former black slave, the novel provides a glimpse into the lives of the African slaves involved in the slave trade as well as the slave traders themselves. Even with the controversy over the authenticity of Equiano’s claims on his origin in Africa and his subsequent voyage through the Middle Passage, this novel serves as a powerfully instructive piece of literature. Throughout the novel, Equiano strives to impress upon the reader a certain set of moral standards or ideals that he desires to instruct the reader about. One such moral ideal that is prevalent throughout the entirety of the novel is Equiano’s construction of the idea of the value and worth of the African slaves, as opposed to the view of the African slaves as simply commodities or objects to be purchased and traded.
Shelby suggests that Jorge Garcia presents an inadequate conception of racism, hence a new, more nuanced concept of racism is necessitated. Garcia contends that “racism is always wrong” and that it is an “individual moral vice” (479). Garcia’s “infection model” explains that an “act is racist insofar as a racist heart infects the conduct of the racist; and an institution is racist insofar as it is rooted in the racist attitudes and the resulting racist-infected actions of its founds and/or current functions” (479). Shelby’s response to this is that an action can be racist even if it is separate from racist intentions. Shelby perceives that Garcia holds the idea that “racist beliefs are a secondary and an inessential feature of racism” since “race-based non-cognitive attitudes are the key ingredient, an...
Equiano characterizes white people in this way through his exceptionalism and the knowledge he obtains, which allows him to recognize the true, hypocritical nature of the white person. Since Equiano is able to reach this noteworthy distinction, he shows that other African people could also reach his potential if allowed, displaying to the audience a new perception of African people. By overturning the common perception of white people at the time, Equiano forces the reader to question the conventions of enslavement so that the public understands the need to abolish captivity and other
“Such a tendency has the slave trade to debauch men’s minds, and harden them to every feeling of humanity” (Equiano 1013). The fact that Equiano could separate the institution of slavery from the white slave owners and focus on the main problem shows that he is a rational intelligent writer. Equiano became a strong supporter of the abolitionist movement which led to the writing of this work. He truly believed that no man should have authority over another man and once he bought his own freedom he continued to pursue this for others as
Human history is littered with racism and prejudice. Vincent N. Parillo tries to explain the origins of racism and prejudice in his essay “Causes of Prejudice”. In the first part of his essay, Parillo explains the psychological approach to racism. In the second half, he speaks about the sociological aspects of racism. His well thought out and organized arguments are extremely insightful in regards to human prejudices. Studs Terkel’s essay "C.P. Ellis" helps define American prejudice from an inside perspective. His story of ex-Klansman C.P. Ellis helps us understand the origins of racism and how it can be passed down from previous generations or is a result of geographical location. Parillo and Terkel both provide insightful information on the
Frederick Douglass’ landmark narrative describes the dehumanization of African-American slaves, while simultaneously humanizing them through his moving prose. Douglass shows the dehumanization of slaves through depictions of violence, deindividuation, and the broken justice system. However, Douglass’ pursuit of an education, moving rhetoric, and critique of his own masters demonstrates to the reader that African-Americans are just as intelligent as white people, thus proving their humanity.