Comparing Dulce Et Decorum Est And Sharon Olds

1132 Words3 Pages

Whether there is a soldier fighting in the heart of war or a city dweller observing the death of civilians, poetry that describes a period of war often portrays it as damaging and destructive. In "Dulce et Decorum Est," Wilfred Owen takes a soldier through trench warfare that ends in the death of a fellow fighter. In "Leningrad Cemetery, Winter of 1941," Sharon Olds has her narrator recount memories of a civilian urban centre during World War II. While both poets use similar techniques to convey the pain and anguish felt during times of war, Wilfred Owen is successful at constructing a more effective poem. An important aspect of literature is the position of the narrator. In "Dulce et Decorum Est," Wilfred Owen uses the first person--point of view of a soldier fighting in the war. I believe that by doing so, he makes it easier to represent war as gruesome …show more content…

The poem opens with two similes depicting the soldiers as being "like old beggars under sacks" (1) that are "coughing like hags" (2). The comparison to a beggar explains the fact that the soldiers have no real home on the battlefield; all they have is a filthy trench. The reference to a coughing hag serves to illustrate how strong, young men have been reduced to weak and unhealthy beings. Hags are also characterized as females which feminizes the soldiers. Owen also uses imagery to deliver a detailed account of the death of one of the soldiers. In the second stanza, the group of men undergoes a gas attack and while most soldiers put their gas masks on in time, one soldier becomes a victim. He is described as "floundering like a man in fire or lime" (12). This description paints a clear picture of a man thrashing about in pain as he is submerged under "a green sea" (14) and the gas eats away at his lungs and he chokes on his own

Open Document