Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The European slave trade
African slave and slave trade
A thesis on the history of the trans atlantic slave trade
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The European slave trade
Inhuman Traffic The greed for money makes humans perform the most repugnant, inhuman actions; then again, there are others who will risk their lives to try to prevent the atrocities. The ultimate inhuman deed is snatching another human being’s freedom and dignity and pushing them into a life of forced labor without their consent, with little or no wages for the rest of their lives. I am, of course, taking about the tragedy of slavery and the booming trade in slaves that flourished in the 19th century across the Atlantic, from Africa to the Americas. Not all men of that time were criminal, and some worked tirelessly to stop the “slavers” and put an end to this evil trade and practice. Feraud was a notorious slave trader, he was the captain …show more content…
In the passage: “The Devastation of the Indies 1555,” the author, Bartolome De Las Casas, a friar in Cuba, describes the atrocities committed by the Spanish against the indigenous Indian population to such an extent that the Indians realized “that these men had not come from heaven” (Riley 629). Although the Spanish used religion as the reason for their massacres and the slavers used profit as their motive, the source of the hatred and the inhuman treatment meted out was very similar. The Spanish considered the Indians savage, wild and ruthless, so the way to deal with them, they must have reasoned, was with greater savagery, which they did. The truth is the Indians were peaceful people, while the colonizers behaved like savages. The slavers, likewise, thought of the Africans as less than human and therefore deserving of the inhumanity imposed on them. Once again the captives were far more human than their captors and traders. It would be difficult to argue which of these situations is more …show more content…
Owen purposefully chose the location of his settlement and new base on Fernando Po, a small island on the West coast of Africa, and near the major slave trading centers. His thinking was that this location would “spare liberated Africans a long, potentially deadly voyage to Freetown” (Blaufarb and Clarke 65). In the present time, such progressive thinking is expected from every person in any position of power, but to display such kindheartedness for the downtrodden in early nineteenth century is truly remarkable and commendable. Another person who developed a compassion for the indigenous people of West Indies was the friar Bartolome De Las Casas in the sixteenth century. For the welfare of the local people he tried to create a utopian society and “devoted his adult life to aiding the Indians in the Americas” (Riley 628). Las Casas’ account of events in West Indies should be considered credible because he himself was from Spain and should have no reason to wrongfully malign his own countrymen. Besides, he was a man of
The source of the first passage that I read was History of the Indies written by Bartolome de Las Casas written in 1528. Bartolome was a 16th century Spanish historian, social reformer and Dominican friar/priest, who condemned the treatment of Indians in the Spanish empire. Bartolome widely disseminated History of the Indies and helped to establish the Black Legend of Spanish cruelty (Give Me Liberty, 28). The source of the second passage that I read was the “Declaration of Josephe” which was created by Josephe on December 19, 1681, and Josephe was a Spanish-speaking Indian questioned by a royal attorney in Mexico City investigating the Pueblo Revolt, which is the revolt of the indian population, in 1680, which temporarily drove Spanish settlers out of present day New Mexico
This assignment examines the document entitled “Bartolomé de las Casas, from Brief Account of the Devastation of the Indies.” Bartolomé de las Casas, who spent most of his time in the New World protecting the native people that lived there, authored the document in 1542. In this document Bartolome de Las Casas gives a detailed but horrific account of the atrocious behavior of the spaniards against the native people of the indies.He vividly describes the brutality brought on the natives by europeans all in the name of proclaiming and spreading Christianity.This document was originally intended for Charles I of Spain and one
The author Kevin Bales ,and co-writer Ron Soodalter, discuss the issues pertaining to forced labor in “Slavery in The Land of The Free”. Free The Slaves is a non-profit organization in Washington that Bales founded to help end slavery not only in the United States, but around the world. The Abraham Lincoln Institute has the honor to have the established historian, Soodalter, serve on it’s board.The two authors also wrote a book by the name of “The Slave Next Door: Human trafficking and Slavery in America Today” (2009). One of the issues that Bales and Soodalter effectively touch on is how widespread the issue of human trafficking and slavery is in
In addition, from Zinn’s analysis, Bartolome thinks Indian people are living in a society which goes by natural economy, they don’t know how to trade with other people because they are very willing to both give their properties to others and take other people’s wealth. Once alien invaders come to their tribe, Indian people were treated as slaves by these alien invaders. On the other hand, Indian people don’t have human rights anymore; alien invaders use them to do dangerous work, such as dug up the hill to look for gold and mineral, and this is labor abuses. Therefore, Bartolome feels it is not right to treat Indians in these ways not only based on Christian religions, but also human’s basic rights.
Of the text named Bartolome de las casas: In Defense of the Indians(c.1550) it covers what is to be the Spanish Conquistadores, and talks of the natives to which at the time seen by many are barbaric, ignorant, incapable of learning, just another group of people to be conquered. But to the Catholic missionaries they see the Natives as new people to influence and enlighten. But if at any time the person drops the belief of Christianity they would use deadly force against the person or family. Adding to that Hernán comments that their cities are “ worth of admiration because of its building, which are like those of Venice”(Poole 4). While the argument remain if really would the Natives had stood a chance what
Christianity itself might have been the main oppressor during the colonization of the Americas and not necessarily the greed or hunger for expansion. Bartolomé de las Casas, was a Spanish Bishop, who was sent to the Americas to teach the “Indians” about Christianity, but through his own eyewitness accounts saw the inhumane treatment of the Natives and criticized the Spanish monarchs and colonizers for being driven by greed and not their Christian beliefs. Although, de las Casas greatly criticized the Spanish, he himself, through his Christian teachings, was still indirectly oppressing the natives. In the excerpts titled, “Hispaniola” and “The Coast of Pearls, Paria, and the Island of Trinidad” from The Very Brief Relation
The discovery and conquest of American Indians inspired efforts to develop an ideology that could justify why they needed to enslave the Indians. The Spanish monarch wanted an ideal empire. "A universal empire, of which all their subjects were but servants. Charles V remained for them the dominus mundi, the legitimate and God-ordained lord of the world." (Weckmann, The Transit of Civilization, 23) Gold and religious conversion was the two most important inspirations for conquistadors in conquering America. Father Bartolome De Las Casas was a Dominican priest who came to the New World to convert the Indians to become Christians. He spent forty years on Hispanolia and nearby islands, and saw how the Spaniards brutally treated the Indians and sympathized with them. The Devastation of the Indies was an actual eyewitness account of the genocide by Las Casas, and his group of Dominican friars in which he demonizes the Spanish colonists and praises the Indians. Father Las Casas returned to Seville, where he published his book that caused an on going debate on whether the suppression of the Indians corrupted the Spaniards' values. What Las Casas was trying to achieve was the notion of human rights, that human beings are free and cogent by nature without the interference of others.
What he and his men did to the Indigenous people is told in horrifying detail by the Dominican priest Bartolome de Las Casas, “whose writings give the most thorough account of the Spanish-Indian encounter.” Las Casas witnessed firsthand Columbus’ soldiers stabbing Natives for sport, dashing babies’ heads on rocks, and sexually abusing Indigenous women. His testimony was corroborated by other eyewitnesses, such as a group of Dominican friars, who addressed the Spanish monarchy in 1519, hoping to bring an end to the atrocities. At the very least, Columbus was complicit in the actions of his men. He cared so little for the welfare of the Indigenous people that he let his soldiers commit reprehensible acts that would be considered crimes against humanity in the present day. Christopher Columbus’ actions suggest he had no issue with serving as an enabler of the horrifying actions committed by his men against the Indigenous
Bartolomé de Las Casas was born in 1484 AD in Seville and died in 1566 in Madrid. In the ending of the 15th century and the beginning of 16th, he came to America and become a “protector of Indian”. In 1542, most based on his effort, Spain has passed the New Law, which prohibit slaving Indians (Foner, p. 7). In 1552, he published the book A Short Account of the Destruction of The Indies.
In A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies, Bartolomé de Las Casas vividly describes the brutality wrought on the natives in the Americas by the Europeans primarily for the purpose of proclaiming and spreading the Christian faith. Las Casas originally intended this account to reach the royal administration of Spain; however, it soon found its way into the hands of many international readers, especially after translation. Bartolomé de Las Casas illustrates an extremely graphic and grim reality to his readers using literary methods such as characterization, imagery, amplification, authorial intrusion and the invocation of providence while trying to appeal to the sympathies of his audience about such atrocities.
It led Columbus to take Arawak Indians as prisoners on his expedition to search for gold. He sailed across islands capturing Indians along the way. He captured 1,500 Arawak men, women, and children sadly but gratefully for them they died on route so some didn’t have to endure the horrible condition that Columbus put them through. However, those that survived were fully naked and treated as animals because that is how whites saw them. Those that survived had to find gold, which was almost impossible wistfully those that didn’t find anything had their hands cut off and bled to death. Due to this inhumane treatment some tried escaping but were unsuccessful and they were hunted like dogs and killed. In addition, the prisoners were forced into war against the Spaniards who were well armed so they had no chance at being victorious. It leads me to believe that the savages were Columbus and his crew. The Arawak’s could take no more heartless and inhumane treatment that they committed mass suicides. To them they’d rather be dead by their own hands then be treated as animals. Columbus atrocious actions “in two years through murder, mutilation, or suicide, half of the 250,000 Indians…were dead” (Zinn 1980:107). What is even more barbaric is them thinking they can do it all over again. When Most of the Arawak Indians were killed they ran low slaves so needed
Cabeza de Vaca, like many other Spaniards, wanted to seek fortune in the new world, but things did not go as planned, and he eventually lost everything. Although he came to conquer in the name of Spain, he ended up living amongst the Native Americans in need for survival and became very close to them. Although originally the Spaniards were very narrow minded and believed the Indians were uncivilized and barbaric, Cabeza de Vaca shortly found out that they were not uncivilized, but quite the opposite. He saw that they were just as human as the Spaniards were and were no less than they were. His perception of humanity altered as a result of living with “the others.”
Today, Americans seem to believe that olden-day slavery is the only possible form of slavery, but they do not see the horrors that go behind all the different types of modern-day slavery around the world. The most common form of slavery today is called debt-bondage, or bonded labor (Meyer, pg. 9). People who are in desperate need of money look for people who can help pay off their debt. Workers receive the pay in the advance, and then do not know how much work they will have to do in order to pay off their debt; therefore, they can never get free of their debt (Meyer, pg
"Slavery is founded on the selfishness of man's nature--opposition to it on his love of justice. These principles are in eternal antagonism; and when brought into collision so fiercely as slavery extension brings them, shocks and throes and convulsions must ceaselessly follow." (Abraham Lincoln)[1]
The word “slavery” brings back horrific memories of human beings. Bought and sold as property, and dehumanized with the risk and implementation of violence, at times nearly inhumane. The majority of people in the United States assumes and assures that slavery was eliminated during the nineteenth century with the Emancipation Proclamation. Unfortunately, this is far from the truth; rather, slavery and the global slave trade continue to thrive till this day. In fact, it is likely that more individuals are becoming victims of human trafficking across borders against their will compared to the vast number of slaves that we know in earlier times. Slavery is no longer about legal ownership asserted, but instead legal ownership avoided, the thought provoking idea that with old slavery, slaves were maintained, compared to modern day slavery in which slaves are nearly disposable, under the same institutionalized systems in which violence and economic control over the disadvantaged is the common way of life. Modern day slavery is insidious to the public but still detrimental if not more than old American slavery.