Bare Life Doty Analysis

994 Words2 Pages

Throughout this week’s reading, I found that there was a heavy emphasis on the correlation between bare life for migrants and harsh realities of border control, which reflects our earlier discussions about territoriality and desirability. In the article, Bare Life, Doty argues that many unauthorized migrants are regarded as bare life individuals “whose deaths are deemed of little consequence” (Doty 599). This concept of bare life is documented in the journey of migrants like Mario Alberto Diaz and Prudencia Martin Gomez, who died from extreme heat exposure while attempting to enter the United States. By utilizing these personal accounts and vivid examples of bodies left to riot under the desert sun, she effectively connects the reader to the …show more content…

I believe the more significant description of bare life migrants is that they are “both wanted and unwanted - wanted for their labor but unwanted as human beings” (Doty 600). Much like the early Irish and Chinese immigrants, undocumented Hispanic migrants are valued and praised for their effectiveness and diligence as workers, especially in low wage jobs that are often deemed undesirable by white workers like agriculture and domestic housework. I believe this parallel in desirability reflects one of the most important themes in our course because of its historical significance and influences on legislation like the Chinese Exclusion Act, which was passed after the competition of Transcontinental Railroad and the subsequent decrease in demand for Chinese workers. However, I would like to challenge the extent to which unauthorized migrants are “wanted” for their labor. While they may be valued for their contribution in areas like “agricultural fields and the meat-packing factories”, they are also seen as potential competitors for domestic jobs (Doty 606). Similar to Samuel Gompers during the National Quota Act of 1924, many modern politicians like Donald Trump have embraced the strong rhetoric associating native job loss with the influx of immigrants, in particular undocumented Hispanics. Therefore, the concept of …show more content…

U.S. in 1889, in which the Supreme Court concluded that plenary powers superseded the individual rights of immigrants. Plenary powers, which gives the legislative and executive branches the sole power to regulate all aspects of immigration, was used to justify the legality of the Chinese Exclusion Act at the time. However, I now recognize how it can also be applied to Japanese internment and the Patriot Act of 2001, in which the Congress used its plenary power along with the pretext of national security to separate and monitor groups of individuals. Like the Japanese during World War II, all of the post 9/11 deportees were never found conspiring to commit any acts of terror. I believe this represents a paradox in which immigration legislation passed for the purpose of national security often target groups who do not possess a threat to the safety of the country, but rather used a political tool and leads to devastating consequences for many innocent individuals like refugees and asylum seekers. As noted by Oxford in her article Acts of Resistance in Asylum Seekers’ Persecution Narratives, lawmakers have used the public fear of terrorism to weaken immigration policies for asylum seekers. However, I would like to challenge Buff and Oxford in that U.S. immigration and asylum policies also depend on

Open Document