BMW Case Analysis

1621 Words4 Pages

Executive Summary

BMW has embarked on a mission to cut its notoriously long product development time in half utilizing a newly developed system code named "Digital Car". Senior management has decided to utilize the new process on the 7-series platform. In order to accomplish this goal, BMW is preparing to take advantage of the latest computer technology in car development. At the forefront of the new plan is a debate over the use of computer-aided-styling (CAS). We recommend that BMW implement the Computer Aided Styling system and processes into their production development program.

Key Areas of Concern

The main business problem that BMW is facing is reducing its long product development time. BMW's current design process began in the early 1990s and utilizes a 60 month design cycle. Senior management set a goal of reducing product development time by 50%. This number is extremely aggressive, but necessary. All of its competitors were attempting to shorten development times as well. A main decision that BMW is facing is whether to adopt CAS in place of its traditional "handcrafted" design techniques.

The need for a shorter design cycle is being driven by customer demand and the extremely competitive automobile market. Customer tastes are ever changing and are demanding more choices. With the long development times, certain features of the car could be out of style by the time the car makes it to market. If BMW doesn't meet the customer demands, their competitors will.

Analysis

BMW sells many low volume vehicle models, as compared to its competitors. To be profitable, they rely on longer production runs, to spread their high fixed costs over a greater time period. The trade-off is a lessened ability to r...

... middle of paper ...

...e to be an unacceptable alternative to the traditional modeling. It may also hinder BMW from meeting its objective of reducing product development time by not using CAS in the meantime. When the time comes to implement CAS it may be more difficult to work into the processes than if CAS was used when the processes were being developed in the first place.

Recommendation

The design room should be required to use CAS. This allows parallelism of vehicle packaging and reduces the lead-time for conversion of the clays into the CAD system. Engineering parallelism requires extensive business process and cultural changes. These should be phased in, instead of a "big-bang" approach – especially on the critical 7-series launch. It will also allow BMW to stay on par with its competitors in reduce product cycle times and ensuring that they always have the best product.

Open Document