Audre Lorde The Uses Of Anger Summary

1070 Words3 Pages

Composed and delivered in 1981, Audre Lorde’s “The Uses of Anger: Women Responding to Racism” speech to the National Women’s Studies Association Conference emerged as a poignant rhetorical artifact in the climate of prevalent racism and the relative social, political, and economic uncertainty of late twentieth-century America. Facing increased backlash for the civil rights movement by the white majority, the African American minority was largely devastated by the widespread loss of urban jobs due to overseas expansion, curtailed government spending on social services, and by “laissez faire racism” that pervaded veritably all aspects of social interaction and livelihood—from education to jobs and consumerism ("Amistad Digital Resource."). It …show more content…

As such, Lorde forwards her compelling argument of the merit of communication of anger in the combating racism by constituting a unified audience of educated white and colored women through the appeal to broad and transcendent motifs, explicitly anger and historical context, as well as a pervasive female victimhood narrative to establish multiple tracks of affinity within her audience as to pursue an ultimate common interest in the crusade against racial bigotry.
Presented to the National Women’s Studies Association Conference in Connecticut, “The Uses of Anger: Women Responding to Racism” addressed an audience of “the nation's largest network of feminist scholars, educators, and activists” ("About."). A self-recognized informed “citizenry,” this audience crucially consisted of both black and white women typically retaining high degrees of education and social standing whose main objectives included “promoting and supporting the production and dissemination of knowledge about women and gender through teaching, learning, research and service in academic and other settings” ("About."). In a conventional context, such an …show more content…

Countering the common social impression that anger in response to a perceived wrong is met with a sense of guilt and fear for dread of fueling conflict by propagating intense self-aware emotional reaction, Lorde makes a cogent argument by elucidating the utter essentiality of anger expression as a means to gain multi-faceted insight into conflict. Lorde realizes this argument regarding the use of anger in a social context to combat racism through the essential and fundamental appeal to such a universal and potent emotion as rage of injustice. Anger effectively transcends race, gender, and class distinctions through its ubiquity to the human experience, and thus provides an initial and embracing commonality to all members of Lorde’s audience. Rather quickly within the delivery of her speech, Lorde provides her audience with a series of concrete anecdotal examples of her many encounters with racism as to avoid her speech “becom[ing] a theoretical discussion” (Lorde). Lorde’s use of these pithy stories of the “harshness of Black women” (Lorde ) and their “self-serving” role in the perpetuation of the issue of racism remedies the common problem of an audience “unacquainted with [orator] provocation, [who] cannot bring [the orator’s] case home to [themselves], nor conceive anything like the passions it

Open Document